GWAV Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
GWAV
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- WHOLESALE-METALS SERVICE CENTERS & OFFICES (5051) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 192
- List Date
- 2015-03-03
- CIK
- 0001589149
- Headquarters
- Chesapeake, VA
- Homepage
- https://www.gwav.com
Greenwave Technology Solutions Inc through its subsidiary, is an operator of several metal recycling facilities in Virginia, Ohio, & North Carolina. At these facilities, the company collects, classifies, & processes appliances, construction materials, end-of-life vehicles, boats, & industrial machinery. The company processes these items by crushing, shearing, shredding, separating, & sorting into smaller pieces & categorizes these recycled ferrous, nonferrous, & mixed metal pieces based on density & metal type before sale. For scrap cars, it removes the catalytic converters, aluminum wheels, &…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 19.99% | 36.82% | -45.35% | -1.72% | 2.43% |
| Feb | -- | 12.04% | -22.86% | -31.58% | -20.49% | -15.72% |
| Mar | 12.54% | -13.33% | -83.67% | -7.60% | -10.94% | -20.60% |
| Apr | -29.63% | -6.43% | -54.97% | -18.37% | 7.50% | -20.38% |
| May | -22.90% | -10.72% | -37.07% | -0.87% | 0.55% | -14.20% |
| Jun | 60.00% | -10.10% | -58.55% | -3.84% | -20.64% | -6.63% |
| Jul | -47.47% | 23.57% | -31.79% | 5.51% | 8.23% | -8.39% |
| Aug | -18.97% | -20.94% | -48.85% | -68.48% | 24.37% | -26.57% |
| Sep | -43.28% | -18.18% | 0.87% | 8.31% | -58.63% | -22.18% |
| Oct | -16.67% | -5.11% | 5.79% | -4.16% | -22.67% | -8.56% |
| Nov | -12.45% | -21.69% | -16.49% | 10.30% | 1.74%* | -7.72% |
| Dec | -21.35% | 17.73% | 92.55% | -19.38% | -- | 17.39% |
| Total | -86.47% | -38.81% | -98.79% | -91.75% | -73.85% | -77.93% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $2.24
SMA 50: $2.84
SMA 200: $3.47
Current: $2.04
EMA 12: $2.11
EMA 26: $2.31
MACD: -0.1961 | Signal: 0.0155
BEARISH
ADX (14): 20.44
WEAK TREND
+DI: 10.02
−DI: 19.06
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 39.80
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 17.31
Stoch %D: 19.94
Williams %R: -76.59
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $2.65
BB Lower: $1.83
NEUTRAL
OBV: 41,773,614
Vol SMA 20: 5,823
Vol ROC: -48.39%
ATR: $0.23
True Range: $0.17
HV 20: 81.1%
HV 30: 76.9%
HV 60: 134.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: GWAV
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical signals indicate a potential downtrend
- Recent trading activity suggests a lack of institutional interest
- Negative beta indicates the stock moves opposite to market, increasing risk
Investment Thesis: GWAV is in a short-term bearish trend, with momentum indicators suggesting further price decline. The stock's negative beta and high volatility increase the risk profile.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news headlines available; however, this lack of news may be contributing to the lack of institutional interest and trading activity.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Downtrend (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: Downtrend (1-3 months)
- Long-term: Neutral (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: SMA 20 ($6.15) and SMA 50 ($7.23) serve as key support levels, while SMA 200 ($12.90) acts as a long-term resistance.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 42.91 (neutral)
- MACD: -0.58 / Signal: -0.12 / Histogram: -0.46 (bearish)
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20 is declining, indicating decreased trading activity. On-Balance Volume (OBV) and Volume Rate of Change both suggest a bearish trend.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral due to lack of recent news.
Catalyst Identification: No imminent catalysts identified, but the lack of news may continue to impact trading activity and sentiment.
Market Narrative: The absence of recent news is contributing to a lack of market narrative, which may be amplifying the bearish trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: -14.57 (high risk)
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime persists, with True Range at $0.34 and Average True Range at $0.92.
Options Market Signals: No options data available to analyze.
Downside Protection: SMA 20 ($6.15) serves as a key support level for short-term traders.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: GWAV is underperforming its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: Decreased trading activity and institutional interest suggest the stock may be in a defensive position.
Correlation Analysis: GWAV has a negative correlation with the market, indicating it moves opposite to broader trends.
Relative Valuation: The stock appears undervalued relative to its historical levels but is still considered high-risk due to its negative beta and high volatility.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20 ($6.15): key support level
- SMA 50 ($7.23): potential resistance level
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No immediate levels identified, but a breakout above SMA 200 ($12.90) could indicate a long-term uptrend.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No imminent catalysts identified, but the lack of news may continue to impact trading activity and sentiment.
Risk Management: Short-term traders should consider setting stop-losses at SMA 20 ($6.15), while medium-term traders should prioritize position sizing and risk management strategies.
This comprehensive analysis highlights GWAV's bearish trend, high risk profile, and the potential for further price decline. The lack of recent news and decreased institutional interest contribute to the stock's negative market narrative. Traders should carefully consider these factors when evaluating their positions in GWAV.
Generated
News
All GWAV news →
GWAV Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.1300
Alpha: -75.42%
Correlation: 0.1470
R-Squared: 2.2%
Stock Volatility: 106.1%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Beta & Alpha Over Time
GWAV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 4 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
GWAV Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-09Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-09 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +2,152,853 | $3.72 | $8.00M | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-28 | Jason T Adelman | Director | Sell (S) | −100,000 | $0.25 | -$25.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-05 | Isaac Dietrich | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +300,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-05 | Cheryl Elizabeth Lanthorn | Director | Award (A) | +300,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-12-05 | Jason T Adelman | Director | Mixed Grant +300,000 · Buy +100,000 |
+400,000 | $0.66 | $66.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-04 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +377,002 | $0.66 | $248.8K | EDGAR |
| 2024-12-04 | Henry Sicignano III | Director | Mixed Buy +100,000 · Grant +300,000 |
+400,000 | $0.66 | $65.9K | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-20 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +450,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-05-14 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Other (J) | +200,000,000 | $0.05 | $10.00M | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-24 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Other (J) | +61,853,899 | $0.12 | $7.22M | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-01 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Conv (C) | +1,013,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-25 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +100 | $1.30 | $130 | EDGAR |
| 2022-11-23 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +6,850 | $1.30 | $8.9K | EDGAR |
| 2022-11-23 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +900 | $1.42 | $1.3K | EDGAR |
| 2022-11-21 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +26,175 | $1.04 | $27.3K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
GWAV Insider Holdings
5 insiders · @ $2.04
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Danny Meeks | Chief Executive Officer | 2,207,651 | $4.51M | $8.29M | 11 | 2026-09-09 |
| 2 | Henry Sicignano III | Director | 6,363 | $13.0K | $65.9K | 1 | 2024-12-04 |
| 3 | Isaac Dietrich | Chief Executive Officer | 2,729 | $5.6K | $0 | 1 | 2024-12-05 |
| 4 | Jason T Adelman | Director | 2,727 | $5.6K | $41.0K | 2 | 2025-02-28 |
| 5 | Cheryl Elizabeth Lanthorn | Director | 2,727 | $5.6K | $0 | 1 | 2024-12-05 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
GWAV Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 9, 2026Directors 3
- Danny Meeks · listed since Oct 2021
- Cheryl Elizabeth Lanthorn · since Apr 18, 2022
- Lisa Louise Lucas-Burke · since Jan 28, 2025
Officers 1
- Danny Meeks · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Oct 2021
10% owners 1
- Danny Meeks · listed since Oct 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (33)
| Feb 14, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Henry Sicignano III from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Lisa Louise Lucas-Burke became a director |
| Aug 7, 2023 | Jason T Adelman became a director |
| Jul 18, 2023 | Henry Sicignano III became a director |
| May 5, 2023 | Isaac Dietrich first listed as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Ashley Elizabeth Sickles as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Sep 13, 2022 | Ashley Elizabeth Sickles became Chief Financial Officer |
| Apr 18, 2022 | The company announced the departure of John Bryan Plumlee from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 18, 2022 | John D. Wood became a director |
| Apr 18, 2022 | John Bryan Plumlee became a director |
| Apr 18, 2022 | Howard Jordan became Chief Financial Officer |
| Apr 18, 2022 | Cheryl Elizabeth Lanthorn became a director |
| Dec 17, 2021 | Isaac Dietrich reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 17, 2021 | Isaac Dietrich reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 17, 2021 | Isaac Dietrich reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Executive Officer |
| Oct 20, 2021 | Danny Meeks first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Oct 20, 2021 | Danny Meeks first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Oct 20, 2021 | Danny Meeks first listed as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 12, 2018 | Steven Lee Osborn II reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Technology Officer |
| Mar 12, 2018 | Scott C Kveton reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Executive Officer |
| Feb 21, 2018 | Graham Farrar became a director |
| Jan 23, 2018 | Jesus Quintero first listed as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| Jan 2, 2018 | Vincent Keber reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jan 2, 2018 | Terence Anthony Fitch reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jan 2, 2018 | Ean Seeb reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Dec 13, 2017 | Nathan E Shelton became a director |
| Dec 13, 2017 | Charles Blum became a director |
| Dec 13, 2017 | Cecil Bond Kyte became a director |
| Oct 16, 2017 | Scott C Kveton became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jun 28, 2017 | Steven Lee Osborn II became Chief Technology Officer |
| Feb 6, 2017 | Jesus Quintero no longer listed as Chief Financial Officer in SEC filings |
| Jan 1, 2017 | George R Pullar became Chief Financial Officer |
| Dec 29, 2016 | Daniel Charles Hunt listed as Chief Operations Officer (previously Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
Not reported recently (12)
- Jason T Adelman · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 28, 2025
- Isaac Dietrich · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 5, 2024
- John D. Wood · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 13, 2023
- Howard Jordan · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Apr 20, 2022
- Jesus Quintero · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 1, 2018
- Cecil Bond Kyte · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 1, 2018
- Charles Blum · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 1, 2018
- Graham Farrar · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 1, 2018
- Nathan E Shelton · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 3, 2018
- George R Pullar · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Feb 7, 2017
- Daniel Charles Hunt · Last reported as Chief Operations Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 3, 2017
- Lance Galey · Last reported as Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 29, 2016
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-10-23
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-15 | 0001493152-26-028562 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
1 ETF hold GWAV
1 shown · $7.37K total exposure
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $7,369 | — | 2026-09-30 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
GWAV vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS Reliance, Inc. | $21.2B | 19.5 | +24.7% | +41.3% | 20 |
| RYI RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION | $1.4B | — | −0.6% | +9.3% | — |
| ZEUS Olympic Steel, Inc. | $539M | 40.9 | −5.6% | +9.1% | — |
| FSTR Foster (Lb) Co | $418M | 40.5 | +10.1% | +56.2% | 22 |
| GWAV Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. Com | $6M | — | — | −56.0% | — |
| Peer median | $994M | 40.5 | +4.8% | +25.3% | 21 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.