Juniper Networks Inc(JNPR)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- IV Rank (30D)
- 83.3
- Straddle Price
- $5.03
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.79
- Market Cap
- $12.3B
- Industry (SIC)
- COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT (3576)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $12.3B
Juniper Networks Inc is engaged in designing, developing, and selling products and services for high-performance networks to enable customers to build scalable, reliable, secure, and cost-effective networks for their businesses while achieving agility and improved operating efficiency through automation. The company's high-performance network and service offerings include routing, switching, Wi-Fi, network security, artificial intelligence (AI) or AI-enabled enterprise networking operations (AIOps), and software-defined networking (SDN) technologies. In addition to the company's products, the …
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
SYMBOL: JNPR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Overall assessment: BULLISH (Confidence level: 8/10) Key drivers: Momentum signals, technical indicators, positive news sentiment Primary risks: Overbought conditions, potential profit taking Investment thesis: The stock is likely to continue its upward trend due to a combination of strong technical indicators and positive news sentiment. Recent news sentiment impact: Neutral headlines have not had a significant impact on the stock price.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS: Trend direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band ($38.88)
- Middle Bollinger Band ($36.48)
Momentum signals:
- RSI interpretation: Overbought (>70), but still above the neutral zone
- MACD signal: Bullish momentum with a strong histogram
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, breakout potential
Volume analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: Increasing trend
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): Positive OBV indicates buying pressure
- Volume Rate of Change: High volume rate suggests institutional interest
NEWS & SENTIMENT ANALYSIS: Recent headlines summary:
- Neutral news headlines from The Motley Fool, Benzinga, and Investing.com Sentiment assessment: Neutral sentiment with no significant impact on the stock price Catalyst identification:
- No immediate catalysts identified Market narrative: Technical signals are driving the market, while news headlines have had a neutral impact
RISK & VOLATILITY ASSESSMENT: Beta interpretation: N/A (vs SPY) - high risk relative to the market Volatility regime: High volatility with an IV premium vs HV30 of 242.8% Options market signals:
- IV rank: High, indicating historically high volatility
- Put/call ratio: Neutral sentiment
Downside protection:
- Critical price levels: $34.07 (lower Bollinger Band) and $36.19 (SMA 50)
- Risk management considerations: Stop-loss levels around $37.00
MARKET CONTEXT & POSITIONING: Sector performance:
- Relative strength vs sector/market: Strong performance in the technology sector Institutional activity:
- Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: High volume rate and increasing OBV Correlation analysis:
- Correlation with SPY (market): 0.85 - strong correlation, high risk
Relative valuation:
- Position within trading range: Within a trading range, potentially due for a breakout or consolidation
KEY LEVELS & ACTION ITEMS: Critical price levels:
- Support: $36.19 (SMA 50) and $34.07 (lower Bollinger Band) Breakout/breakdown levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band ($38.88) - potential resistance Time-sensitive catalysts:
- No immediate catalysts identified
Risk management:
- Stop-loss levels around $37.00
- Position sizing considerations: Consider reducing position size to manage risk
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | After-Close | 8.24% | 0.03% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | After-Close | 2.11% | 0.46% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2025-02-04 | After-Close | 4.53% | 2.24% | 0.49x | Within |
| 2025-05-01 | After-Close | 2.82% | 0.57% | 0.20x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 83.3
- IV Rank (7D)
- 83.3
- Avg IV
- 82.2%
- Straddle (30D)
- $5.03
- Straddle (7D)
- $5.03
- P/C Volume
- 0.79
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-02 | Steven Fernandez | Director | Disp (D) | −21,818 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | JAMES A DOLCE JR | Director | Disp (D) | −31,995 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | JANET BRUTSCHEA HAUGEN | Director | Disp (D) | −51,154 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | Anne DelSanto | Director | Disp (D) | −40,354 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | KEVIN A DENUCCIO | Director | Disp (D) | −28,579 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | Rahul N Merchant | Director | Disp (D) | −88,524 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | SCOTT KRIENS | Director | Disp (D) | −2,277,531 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | Christine Marie Gorjanc | Director | Disp (D) | −51,154 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | WILLIAM STENSRUD | Director | Disp (D) | −124,548 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-01 | Thomas A Austin | GVP & CAO | Grant (A) | +13,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | KEVIN A DENUCCIO | Director | Exer (M) | +7,029 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | JANET BRUTSCHEA HAUGEN | Director | Exer (M) | +7,029 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Christine Marie Gorjanc | Director | Exer (M) | +7,029 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | Rahul N Merchant | Director | Exer (M) | +7,029 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-05-28 | SCOTT KRIENS | Director | Mixed | +7,029 | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rami rahim | Chief Executive Officer | 1,133,655 | $45.29M | -$20.87M | 101 | 2025-03-24 |
| 2 | KEVIN R JOHNSON | Chief Executive Officer | 411,286 | $16.43M | -$6.75M | 17 | 2014-02-25 |
| 3 | PRADEEP SINDHU | Director | 388,894 | $15.54M | -$164.22M | 99 | 2017-05-18 |
| 4 | ROBYN M DENHOLM | EVP CFO & Ops | 207,977 | $8.31M | -$7.68M | 37 | 2016-02-26 |
| 5 | Anand Athreya | EVP Chief Development Officer | 194,240 | $7.76M | -$3.36M | 16 | 2022-03-21 |
| 6 | John Morris | EVP Sales | 180,639 | $7.22M | -$4.28M | 6 | 2011-07-19 |
| 7 | Kenneth Bradley Miller | EVP CFO | 122,517 | $4.89M | -$10.40M | 51 | 2025-03-24 |
| 8 | Geraldine Elliott | EVP Chief Customer Officer | 119,328 | $4.77M | -$1.65M | 6 | 2014-02-19 |
| 9 | ROBERT L MUGLIA | EVP SW Solutions Division | 119,078 | $4.76M | $0 | 6 | 2013-12-02 |
| 10 | Robert Mobassaly | SVP General Counsel | 106,935 | $4.27M | -$609.4K | 25 | 2025-03-24 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-11 | Kaddaras Christopher Nicholas Jr | Officer | 90,000 | $3.24M | 2025-03-11 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-26 | Leelanivas Manoj | Officer | 30,978 | $1.12M | 2025-02-26 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-06-27 | K MILLER & S C MILLER CO-TTEE THE MILLER 2002 REVOCABLE TRUST U/T/A DTD 06/20/2002 | Officer | 188,669 | $6.73M | 2024-06-27 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-15 | KENNETH MILLER | Officer | 15,000 | $517.1K | 2024-05-15 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-03 | Rami Rahim | Officer | 49,995 | $1.85M | 2024-04-03 | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-21 | Leelanivas Manoj | Officer | 12,291 | $454.2K | 2024-02-21 | MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-21 | ROBERT MOBASSALY | Officer | 5,173 | $190.3K | 2024-02-21 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-20 | Leelanivas Manoj | Officer | 79,267 | $2.93M | 2024-02-20 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-16 | DENUCCIO KEVIN A | Director | 3,500 | $129.7K | 2024-02-16 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-15 | KENNETH MILLER | Officer | 15,000 | $556.2K | 2024-02-15 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.