Automation and a tax break lifted profits as new orders pile up.
JRSH Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
JRSH
—
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- APPAREL & OTHER FINISHD PRODS OF FABRICS & SIMILAR MATL (2300) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 6,300
- List Date
- 2018-05-04
- CIK
- 0001696558
- Last Earnings
- Aug 10
- Headquarters
- Rochester, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.jerashholdings.com
Jerash Holdings (US) Inc along with its subsidiaries, is a manufacturer and exporter of customized, ready-made sport and outerwear from knitted fabric from its production facilities in Jordan. The company manufactures for retailers, including Walmart, Costco, Sears, Hanes, Columbia, Land's End, VF Corporation, and Philip-Van Heusen, which owns brands such as The North Face, Nautica, Timberland, Wrangler, Lee, Jansport, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, IZOD, and Speedo. It derives its revenue from the manufacturing and sales of outerwear in the United States. The company's product offering consist…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.04% | -6.89% | 9.37% | -2.54% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.40% |
| Feb | 3.39% | 15.85% | 4.79% | -3.22% | 7.02% | 5.88% | 5.62% |
| Mar | 7.88% | -11.45% | 0.21% | 4.79% | -4.23% | -9.97% | -2.13% |
| Apr | -2.94% | -10.42% | -2.66% | 0.32% | -12.94% | 18.31% | -1.72% |
| May | -7.73% | 12.85% | -8.52% | -3.51% | 8.58% | -3.68% | -0.34% |
| Jun | 3.90% | -28.64% | -9.27% | 0.00% | 2.76% | 39.83% | 1.43% |
| Jul | 8.23% | 20.12% | 1.90% | 4.10% | 2.44% | -3.07% | 5.62% |
| Aug | 8.97% | -7.09% | -14.91% | -2.32% | 3.92% | 19.79% | 1.39% |
| Sep | -14.29% | -20.60% | -9.40% | 4.15% | -2.35% | 2.45% | -6.67% |
| Oct | -6.96% | -4.23% | 2.96% | 0.79% | 1.80% | 1.80% | -0.64% |
| Nov | 5.17% | 7.51% | -8.79% | 12.17% | -8.33% | 20.07%* | 4.63% |
| Dec | -4.15% | -12.58% | 11.03% | -0.87% | 0.00% | -- | -1.31% |
| Total | -0.58% | -45.04% | -24.00% | 13.56% | -2.04% | 120.86% | 10.46% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $6.37
SMA 50: $6.01
SMA 200: $4.40
Current: $7.30
EMA 12: $6.76
EMA 26: $6.41
MACD: 0.3507 | Signal: 0.1512
BULLISH
ADX (14): 31.86
TREND
+DI: 32.95
−DI: 12.55
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 66.34
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 81.04
Stoch %D: 86.91
Williams %R: -27.30
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $7.57
BB Lower: $5.17
NEUTRAL
OBV: 42,951,411
Vol SMA 20: 169,113
Vol ROC: 77.71%
ATR: $0.40
True Range: $0.39
HV 20: 68.8%
HV 30: 59.6%
HV 60: 52.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-15T00:00:00 – 2026-11-13T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Written before JRSH’s Nov 10 earnings report, so it doesn’t reflect the results.
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Oversold RSI indicating potential buy signal
- MACD bearish momentum weakening, suggesting a possible reversal
- Recent news sentiment neutral, no significant market-moving headlines
Primary Risks:
- Volatility regime low, increasing the risk of sudden price movements
- Beta close to market, making JRSH more volatile than expected
Investment Thesis: JRSH is likely to rebound in the short-term due to oversold conditions and weakening bearish momentum. However, caution should be exercised due to low volatility and potential for unexpected market moves.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news headlines available, which reduces the impact on the analysis.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bearish, Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral, Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $3.27 (resistance)
- SMA 50: $3.30 (support)
- SMA 200: $3.33 (support)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (>70) indicating potential buy signal
- MACD signal: Bearish momentum weakening, suggesting a possible reversal
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis:
- Volume trends: Increasing volume on the decline, indicating selling pressure
- Institutional interest signals: No unusual activity detected
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment due to lack of market-moving headlines
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or product launches expected in the near term
Market Narrative: No significant market-moving headlines, keeping the narrative neutral
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta close to market (0.57), indicating moderate risk
Volatility Regime: Low volatility regime in place
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 50 ($3.30) and SMA 200 ($3.33)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: JRSH is outperforming its sector peers
Institutional Activity: No unusual institutional activity detected
Correlation Analysis: JRSH has a moderate positive correlation with the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.43)
Relative Valuation: JRSH is trading near the lower end of its recent range, potentially indicating value
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 ($3.27) and SMA 50 ($3.30) as support levels
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: SMA 200 ($3.33) as a potential breakout level
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming events or product launches expected in the near term
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at SMA 20 ($3.27) and position sizing considerations based on risk tolerance
Generated
News
All JRSH news →
JRSH Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Put vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Call vs ATM
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsThe same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.
- Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
- Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Reading them together
Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Put —
30 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Put —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.5797
Alpha: 84.23%
Correlation: 0.1843
R-Squared: 3.4%
Stock Volatility: 42.9%
Market Volatility: 13.6%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own JRSH
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $1.4M | #2118 of 3151 | -16.5% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $236K | #5315 of 6285 | -22.9% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
JRSH Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
JRSH Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-04-23Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | Gilbert K. Lee | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −400 | $3.32 | -$1.3K | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-27 | Bill Korn | Director | Award (A) | +4,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-27 | Chi Yan Mak | Director | Award (A) | +4,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-27 | Ibrahim H. Saif | Director | Award (A) | +4,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-27 | Tsze Lun Ng | 10%+ Owner | Award (A) | +320,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-27 | Gilbert K. Lee | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +10,800 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-27 | Yang Wei | Vice President and Secretary | Award (A) | +66,600 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-27 | Lin Hung Choi | Chairman/CEO/Pres./Treasurer | Award (A) | +320,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-17 | Gilbert K. Lee | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +6,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-17 | Tsze Lun Ng | 10%+ Owner | Award (A) | +125,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-17 | Ibrahim H. Saif | Director | Award (A) | +2,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-17 | Bill Korn | Director | Award (A) | +2,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-17 | Yang Wei | Vice President and Secretary | Award (A) | +37,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-17 | Chi Yan Mak | Director | Award (A) | +2,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-02-17 | Lin Hung Choi | Chairman/CEO/Pres./Treasurer | Award (A) | +125,000 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
JRSH Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $7.30
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gilbert K. Lee | Chief Financial Officer | 5,000 | $36.5K | -$1.3K | 8 | 2026-04-23 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
JRSH Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Apr 23, 2026Directors 2
- Ibrahim H. Saif · since Jan 9, 2020
- Bill Korn · since Jun 15, 2020
Officers 1
- Gilbert K. Lee · Chief Financial Officer · since Nov 26, 2019
Changes in the last 10 years (17)
| Jan 29, 2026 | Tsze Lun Ng no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Kian Tjiauw Lee reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 15, 2020 | Bill Korn became a director |
| Jan 9, 2020 | Ibrahim H. Saif became a director |
| Nov 26, 2019 | Gilbert K. Lee became Chief Financial Officer |
| Sep 12, 2018 | Karl Brenza became Head of U.S. Operations |
| May 2, 2018 | Yang Wei became a director |
| May 2, 2018 | Yang Wei became Vice President and Secretary |
| May 2, 2018 | Tsze Lun Ng became a 10% owner |
| May 2, 2018 | Sean Socha became a director |
| May 2, 2018 | Richard J. Shaw became Chief Financial Officer |
| May 2, 2018 | Lin Hung Choi became a director |
| May 2, 2018 | Lin Hung Choi became a 10% owner |
| May 2, 2018 | Lin Hung Choi became Chairman/CEO/Pres./Treasurer |
| May 2, 2018 | Kian Tjiauw Lee became a 10% owner |
| May 2, 2018 | Gary J. Haseley became a director |
| May 2, 2018 | Chi Yan Mak became a director |
Not reported recently (7)
- Chi Yan Mak · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 27, 2024
- Yang Wei · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 27, 2024
- Lin Hung Choi · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 27, 2024
- Karl Brenza · Last reported as Head of U.S. Operations in an SEC filing dated Sep 27, 2018
- Gary J. Haseley · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 18, 2018
- Richard J. Shaw · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Sep 18, 2018
- Sean Socha · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 2, 2018
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-11-12
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-10 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-11-05 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-11-02 | Material agreement · Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-11 | Shareholder vote results · Other events | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-10 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Regulation FD disclosure | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-21 | Director or officer change | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-15 | Earnings results | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 | 0001213900-26-070227 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
11 ETFs hold JRSH
11 shown · $2.06M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $749,689 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $397,818 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $367,860 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 4 | DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $151,917 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 5 | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $147,448 | $1.2B | 2026-11-12 |
| 6 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $87,333 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 7 | DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $78,086 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 8 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $52,075 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 9 | DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $23,050 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 10 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $5,512 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 11 | BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $3,367 | — | 2026-06-30 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
JRSH vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS Amer Sports, Inc. | $17.6B | — | — | −20.2% | 79 |
| LULU lululemon athletica inc. | $12.1B | 8.7 | +1.7% | −49.9% | 93 |
| LEVI Levi Strauss & Co. Class A Common Stock | $9.2B | 15.3 | +3.4% | +16.7% | 13 |
| GIL Gildan Activewear Inc. | $6.5B | — | — | −44.9% | 61 |
| FIGS FIGS, Inc. | $3.8B | 59.6 | +28.9% | +93.6% | 23 |
| ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. | $3.6B | — | — | +32.3% | 34 |
| COLM Columbia Sportswear Co | $3.6B | 16.1 | +0.1% | +31.1% | 31 |
| UAA Under Armour, Inc. | $2.1B | — | −4.2% | −7.2% | 24 |
| JRSH Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. Common Stock | $93M | — | — | +138.6% | — |
| Peer median | $5.1B | 15.7 | +1.7% | +4.7% | 33 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.