PTC, INC(PTC)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$115.78
- 52-Week Range
- $108.50 – $219.69
- YTD
- -31.94%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 64.63
- Straddle Price
- $8.70
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.39
- Market Cap
- $13.0B
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.50% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.00% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.54% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +31.5pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +20.2% |
| DCF Horizon | 15 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.9B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 32.3% |
| Book / Price | 28.6% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 84.7% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 31.0% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.30 |
| Quality Score | 6/6 — compounder (15y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +3.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $135.40 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $126.91 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 30.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.7B |
| Market Cap | $13B |
Peers used for multiples: ADSK, AVGO, DDD, HPQ, META, NNDM, NVDA, SNPS
Blended Fair Value
$222.58
Current Price
$115.72
Deviation
+50.0%
Forward-Return Rank
LONG
gates ✓
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -2.3% ⚠ | +0.49 | +1.29 | 88.5% | — |
| 42d | -3.5% ⚠ | +0.64 | +1.36 | 87.1% | — |
| 63d | -3.3% ⚠ | +0.68 | +1.38 | 87.4% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $392.87 | 21% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $312.34 | 9% | median 27.2× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $250.60 | 9% | median 22.0× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $294.61 | 2% | median 9.2× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $181.18 | 6% | median 6.6× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $135.40 | 31% | stability 74% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $133.62 | 21% | 20 strikes · skew +0.62 |
As of 2026-06-26 · updated 2026-06-26 20:59:30.580000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $13.0B
PTC is a US-based global company that offers high-end computer-assisted design, product lifecycle management, and augmented reality solutions that industrial manufacturers commonly use on factory floors. Founded in 1985, PTC is a major player in parametric design and serves some of the world's most well-known equipment manufacturers, such as Caterpillar, Garmin, and Thermo Fisher.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +1.89% | 20 |
| Feb | +0.37% | 20 |
| Mar | -0.01% | 20 |
| Apr | +3.07% | 20 |
| May | +5.71% | 20 |
| Jun | -1.65% | 20 |
| Jul | -1.10% | 19 |
| Aug | -1.07% | 19 |
| Sep | -0.31% | 20 |
| Oct | +0.51% | 20 |
| Nov | +2.70% | 20 |
| Dec | +3.47% | 21 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $125.75
SMA 50: $134.98
SMA 200: $163.72
Current: $115.72
EMA 12: $118.44
EMA 26: $125.83
MACD: -7.3945 | Signal: -0.8434
BEARISH
ADX (14): 31.84
TREND
+DI: 12.31
−DI: 31.52
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 33.63
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 16.29
Stoch %D: 13.93
Williams %R: -75.90
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $150.00
BB Lower: $101.51
NEUTRAL
OBV: -21,639,439
Vol SMA 20: 2,343,468
Vol ROC: -19.87%
ATR: $5.13
True Range: $4.01
HV 20: 55.7%
HV 30: 48.0%
HV 60: 41.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-26T21:15:11.531000
Date Range: 2024-06-28T00:00:00 – 2026-06-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Earnings History
6 of 7 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | After-Close | 7.28% | 1.57% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2024-11-06 | After-Close | 7.22% | 1.20% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-02-05 | After-Close | 7.65% | 7.36% | 0.96x | Within |
| 2025-07-30 | After-Close | 9.21% | 0.55% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2025-11-05 | After-Close | 7.61% | 8.46% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-04 | After-Close | 8.65% | 1.06% | 0.12x | Within |
| 2026-05-06 | After-Close | 6.19% | 4.44% | 0.72x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 64.63
- IV Rank (7D)
- 64.63
- Avg IV
- 83.4%
- Straddle (30D)
- $8.70
- Straddle (7D)
- $8.70
- P/C Volume
- 0.39
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.56
- Correlation (SPY)
- 19.3%
- R²
- 0.04
- Ann. Volatility
- 36.1%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.5%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 119,945,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
10 filers$45.84M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $20.09M | 43.83% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $8.16M | 17.81% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | Verition Fund Management LLC | $6.93M | 15.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $3.31M | 7.21% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $3.23M | 7.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $1.77M | 3.87% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $733.82K | 1.60% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $579.11K | 1.26% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $517.79K | 1.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $512.96K | 1.12% | 2026-03-31 |
14 filers$84.56M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $24.71M | 29.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $18.55M | 21.94% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | PEAK6 LLC | $15.90M | 18.81% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $9.61M | 11.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $7.12M | 8.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.99M | 2.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $1.77M | 2.10% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $1.35M | 1.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | BRANT POINT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC | $1.08M | 1.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $712.45K | 0.84% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | LOGAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC | $636.36K | 0.75% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $493.69K | 0.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $413.22K | 0.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $203.84K | 0.24% | 2025-09-30 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-05-12
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | ALICE CHRISTENSON | Chief Accounting Officer | Sell (S) | −816 | $145.82 | -$119.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-08 | ALICE CHRISTENSON | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +816 | $147.65 | -$54.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-18 | Corinna Lathan | Director | Sell (S) | −675 | $157.24 | -$106.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-16 | Trac Pham | Director | Exer (M) | +1,181 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-04 | AARON C VON STAATS | EVP, Chief Legal Officer | Sell (S) | −2,639 | $160.00 | -$422.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | Mark D Benjamin | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | ROBERT BERNSHTEYN | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | JANICE CHAFFIN | Director | Exer (M) | +1,801 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | Amarpreet Hanspal | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | Michal Katz | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | PAUL A LACY | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | Corinna Lathan | Director | Exer (M) | +1,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | JAMES A LICO | Director | Exer (M) | +410 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | Trac Pham | Director | Exer (M) | +1,431 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-12 | AARON C VON STAATS | EVP, Chief Legal Officer | Sell (S) | −240 | $161.10 | -$38.7K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
50 insiders · @ $115.72
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blake D. Moret | Director | 6,059,481 | $701.20M | -$580.99M | 116 | 2023-08-01 |
| 2 | JOHN W JR SAMMON | Chairman & CEO | 2,173,964 | $251.57M | $0 | 5 | 2010-04-29 |
| 3 | JAMES E HEPPELMANN | CEO | 990,228 | $114.59M | -$65.53M | 58 | 2024-02-06 |
| 4 | CHARLES A CONSTANTINO | Exec. VP | 240,950 | $27.88M | -$157.9K | 8 | 2010-06-07 |
| 5 | MICHAEL E PORTER | Director | 231,599 | $26.80M | -$371.8K | 4 | 2015-03-05 |
| 6 | JEFFREY D GLIDDEN | Chief Financial Officer, EVP | 163,266 | $18.89M | $0 | 1 | 2014-11-17 |
| 7 | GREGORY T CORTESE | Executive Vice President, OOC | 122,207 | $14.14M | -$1.35M | 40 | 2010-08-12 |
| 8 | Craig Hayman | EVP, Chief Operating Officer | 119,082 | $13.78M | $0 | 4 | 2017-11-17 |
| 9 | Neil Barua | President and CEO | 89,164 | $10.32M | $0 | 13 | 2026-01-14 |
| 10 | RENATO ZAMBONINI | Director | 66,619 | $7.71M | $0 | 4 | 2017-03-03 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Notice of Proposed Sale (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-12
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $119K notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Parsed directly from EDGAR primary-doc XML. Daily refresh; new filings typically appear here the morning after they hit EDGAR.
Top 90-day filers:
ALICE CHRISTENSON (1, $119K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | ALICE CHRISTENSON | Officer | 816 | $119.0K | 2026-05-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-16 | CORINNA LATHAN | Director | 675 | $105.2K | 2026-03-16 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-11 | VON STAATS AARON C | Officer | 4,798 | $778.4K | 2026-02-11 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-06 | KRISTIAN TALVITIE | Officer | 28,196 | $4.39M | 2026-02-06 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-09 | KRISTIAN TALVITIE | Officer | 50,291 | $8.71M | 2025-12-09 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-08 | VON STAATS AARON C | Officer | 6,328 | $1.10M | 2025-12-08 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-05 | KRISTIAN TALVITIE | Officer | 4,658 | $831.5K | 2025-12-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-25 | ALICE CHRISTENSON | Officer | 1,323 | $229.6K | 2025-11-25 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-06 | VON STAATS AARON C | Officer | 1,988 | $428.8K | 2025-08-06 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-04 | ALICE CHRISTENSON | Officer | 676 | $146.3K | 2025-08-04 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-05-07
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 0001193125-26-208904 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-16 | 0001193125-26-107315 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-11 | 0001193125-26-046516 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-04 | 0001193125-26-037588 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-04 | 0001193125-25-308126 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-05 | 0001193125-25-266865 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-05 | 0001193125-25-267120 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-14 | 0001193125-25-237840 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-30 | 0000950170-25-100205 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-30 | 0000950170-25-061017 | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-21 | 0001193125-25-291326 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-14 | 0000950170-24-127231 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-20 | 0000950123-23-011049 | EDGAR |
| 2022-11-15 | 0000950170-22-025211 | EDGAR |
| 2021-11-22 | 0001564590-21-057806 | EDGAR |
| 2020-11-20 | 0001564590-20-054803 | EDGAR |
| 2019-11-18 | 0000857005-19-000040 | EDGAR |
| 2018-11-16 | 0000857005-18-000025 | EDGAR |
| 2017-11-29 | 0000857005-17-000021 | EDGAR |
| 2016-11-18 | 0000857005-16-000071 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 0001193125-26-209869 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-05 | 0001193125-26-039347 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0000950170-25-100879 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-01 | 0000950170-25-061801 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-06 | 0000950170-25-015530 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-02 | 0000950170-24-089978 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-03 | 0000950170-24-052860 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-02 | 0000950170-24-010527 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-04 | 0000950170-23-038543 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-03 | 0000950170-23-017177 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 11.1 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.8 |
| TTM Revenue | $3.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $1.2B |
| TTM EPS | $10.42 |
| ROE | 32.3% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.31 |