RDFN Redfin Corporation Common Stock

XNAS 11.25 Delayed
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

RDFN $11.25 —
Key stats
$11.25
52-Week Range
$11.30 – $11.30
YTD
-0.44%
IV Rank (30D)
47.17
Straddle Price
$2.02
P/C Vol Ratio
1.29
Market Cap
$1.4B
Open
$11.30
Day Range
$11.30 – $11.30
Prev Close
$11.30
Fair Value
-7.8% vs price

A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.

  • DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
  • Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
  • DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
  • P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
  • Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
  • Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
  • Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
  • Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
10-yr Treasury (rf)4.00%
Beta vs SPY1.00
Cost of Equity (CAPM)9.50% (VRP-adj)
WACC9.50%
Volatility Risk Premium+47.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps
Effective Tax Rate21.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input)+3.0%
DCF Horizon5 years explicit + fade
Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM)×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S)
Quality Score0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF)
SMA 50$10.42 (Market Anchor value)
SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid$11.23
Bollinger Width / SMA2089.3% (drives anchor stability)
Net Debt$0.0B
Blended Fair Value
$10.42
Deviation
-7.8%
MethodImplied PriceWeightDetail
DCF n/a 0%
DDM (Gordon) n/a 0%
Peer P/E n/a 0%
Peer EV/EBITDA n/a 0%
Peer P/B n/a 0%
Peer P/S n/a 0%
Market Anchor (SMA50) $10.42 100% stability 67% (BB-width)
Options Expected (B-L 30d) n/a 0%
As of 2026-06-01 · updated
About
Industry (SIC)
REAL ESTATE AGENTS & MANAGERS (FOR OTHERS) (6531) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$1.4B
Employees
4,778
List Date
2017-07-28
CIK
0001382821
Headquarters
Seattle, WA
Homepage
https://www.redfin.com

Redfin Corp is a residential real estate broker. It pairs its agents with the technology to create a service that is faster and costs less. The company meets customers through a listings-search website and mobile application. The company uses the same combination of technology and local service to originate mortgage loans and offer title and settlement services. It has five operating segments real estate services, rentals, mortgage, title, and monetization. The company generates the majority of its revenue from Real estate services.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Insufficient price history — listed 3373 days ago. Seasonality patterns need at least one full year of data.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $11.23
SMA 50: $10.42
SMA 200: $9.52
Current: $11.30
EMA 12: $11.26
EMA 26: $11.01
MACD: 0.2514 | Signal: -0.0548
BULLISH
ADX (14): 25.67
TREND
+DI: 26.39
−DI: 16.79

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 60.10
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 36.69
Stoch %D: 42.66
Williams %R: -64.29

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $11.79
BB Lower: $10.67
NEUTRAL
OBV: -61,707,949
Vol SMA 20: 4,084,110
Vol ROC: -100.00%
ATR: $0.23
True Range: $0.00
HV 20: 32.2%
HV 30: 33.9%
HV 60: 44.0%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2023-07-18T00:00:00 – 2026-03-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report - RDFN

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10)

Key drivers:

  • Recent negative news headlines impacting sentiment
  • Technical indicators showing a neutral momentum signal with potential for mean reversion
  • High volatility regime and IV premium, indicating potential for significant price movements

Primary risks:

  • Negative news sentiment affecting stock price
  • High volatility and risk of sharp price swings
  • Lack of earnings data making it challenging to gauge fundamental performance

Investment thesis: RDFN's current valuation appears reasonable, considering its recent performance. However, the high volatility regime and negative news sentiment create uncertainty around the stock's potential for significant price movements.

Recent news sentiment impact: The recent negative headlines have had a substantial impact on sentiment, contributing to the stock's neutral overall assessment.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: NEUTRAL (no clear short-term or medium-term trend)

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $11.23
  • SMA 50: $10.42
  • SMA 200: $9.52
  • Bollinger Bands Upper: $11.79
  • Middle: $11.23
  • Lower: $10.67

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI (14): 60.10 (neutral)
  • MACD: 0.25 / Signal: -0.05 / Histogram: 0.31 (bullish)

Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals are mixed, indicating no clear buying or selling pressure.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: Negative news headlines dominated the recent period, contributing to the stock's neutral overall assessment.

Sentiment Assessment: SENTIMENT IS NEGATIVE (based on 80% negative headlines)

Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or earnings reports currently scheduled that could significantly impact the stock price.

Market Narrative: The recent negative news has created uncertainty around RDFN's potential for significant price movements, making it challenging to predict a clear direction.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: N/A (beta not available)

Volatility Regime: HIGH VOLATILITY REGIME (IV premium: 129.2%)

Options Market Signals:

  • IV Rank: 29.5% (Medium - shows if volatility is historically high/low)
  • Put/Call Volume Ratio: 1.29 (Neutral sentiment)

Downside Protection: Support levels are present at SMA 20 and SMA 50, offering some protection against potential declines.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: N/A (no sector data available)

Institutional Activity: No clear buying or selling pressure evident in volume trends.

Correlation Analysis: Correlation with the broader market is unclear due to lack of beta information.

Relative Valuation: RDFN's current valuation appears reasonable, considering its recent performance.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • SMA 20: $11.23
  • SMA 50: $10.42
  • SMA 200: $9.52

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear levels evident for a potential breakout or breakdown.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming events or earnings reports currently scheduled that could significantly impact the stock price.

Risk Management: Consider using stop-loss levels at SMA 20 and SMA 50 to protect against potential declines.

Generated
Earnings History
11 of 18 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
15.61%
Avg Actual Move
13.62%
Each row pairs the pre-earnings straddle-implied expected move with the realized close-to-close move. Sorted oldest first.
Earnings Date Timing Expected Move Actual Move Ratio Outcome
2021-02-24 After-Close 15.61% 19.63% 1.26x Exceeded
2021-05-05 After-Close 12.14% 15.68% 1.29x Exceeded
2021-08-05 After-Close 12.18% 8.20% 0.67x Within
2021-11-04 After-Close 13.06% 3.10% 0.24x Within
2022-02-17 After-Close 14.32% 20.18% 1.41x Exceeded
2022-05-05 After-Close 24.01% 3.53% 0.15x Within
2022-08-04 After-Close 19.82% 14.32% 0.72x Within
2022-11-09 After-Close 23.85% 31.80% 1.33x Exceeded
2023-02-16 After-Close 15.87% 6.55% 0.41x Within
2023-05-04 After-Close 11.58% 33.19% 2.87x Exceeded
2023-08-03 After-Close 11.01% 24.39% 2.22x Exceeded
2023-11-02 After-Close 15.78% 21.89% 1.39x Exceeded
2024-02-27 After-Close 17.88% 2.23% 0.12x Within
2024-05-06 After-Close 15.63% 1.39% 0.09x Within
2024-08-06 After-Close 15.58% 9.35% 0.60x Within
2024-11-07 After-Close 17.23% 15.62% 0.91x Within
2025-02-27 After-Close 13.68% 12.70% 0.93x Within
2025-05-06 After-Close 11.76% 1.43% 0.12x Within

Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →

RDFN Options Activity & IV Rank

RDFN IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →

Volatility Metrics

Current IV: 92.5%
7-DTE IV: 61.5%
Expected Move: $2.02
7-DTE Move: $0.67
Days to Exp: 32 (2025-08-01)

Options Flow

Call Volume: 21
Put Volume: 27
P/C Volume: 1.286
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 69
Put OI: 32
P/C OI: 0.464
Total OI: 101

ATM Options Pricing

ATM Call: $0.68
ATM Put: $1.34
Call %: 6.0%
Put %: 12.0%

Chain Summary

Chain Volume: 4,540
Chain OI: 148,239
Last Updated: 6/30/2025
Spread Scanner GPU
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Dealer Positioning
HIGH γ vs HISTORY

Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 88th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.

Gamma percentile
88%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.62
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.38
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.55
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.38: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.55: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.

Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.

Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.

Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.

This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.

· 29 ATM contracts, 13k total OI
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
as of Jun 30 · ATM 58.4% / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
as of Jun 30 · ATM 76.1% / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)9.3LowJun 30
IV Rank (30 DTE)47.2MediumJun 30
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$2.02Jun 30
Beta Analysis
Insufficient price history — listed 3373 days ago. Beta and correlation vs SPY require ~1 year of daily returns to be statistically meaningful.

RDFN Institutional Ownership (13F)

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

RDFN Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2025-06-30
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2025-06-30 Kerry D Chandler Director Exer (M) +17,080 — EDGAR
2025-06-30 Robert J Bass Director Exer (M) +17,080 — EDGAR
2025-06-30 Selina Tobaccowala Director Exer (M) +17,080 — EDGAR
2025-06-30 Julie Bornstein Director Exer (M) +17,080 — EDGAR
2025-06-30 James Slavet Director Exer (M) +20,847 — EDGAR
2025-06-30 Austin Ligon Director Exer (M) +68,565 — EDGAR
2025-06-30 Bradley E Singer Director Exer (M) +33,899 — EDGAR
2025-06-30 David H Lissy Director Exer (M) +93,738 — EDGAR
2025-06-26 Anna Stevens Chief Human Resources Officer Mixed +67,008 $11.54 -$506.1K EDGAR
2025-06-25 Christian John Taubman Chief Growth Officer Mixed +18,080 $10.26 -$59.7K EDGAR
2025-06-25 Jason Aleem Chief of Real Estate Services Mixed +13,009 $10.26 -$43.0K EDGAR
2025-06-25 Robert J Bass Director Exer (M) +25,423 — EDGAR
2025-06-25 Anthony Ray Kappus Chief Legal Officer Mixed +15,669 $10.26 -$51.8K EDGAR
2025-06-25 Bridget Frey Chief Technology Officer Mixed +19,203 $10.26 -$66.3K EDGAR
2025-06-24 Julie Bornstein Director Exer (M) +25,423 — EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

RDFN Insider Holdings

14 insiders · @ $11.30
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 James Slavet Director 5,928,804 $67.00M -$1.81M 26 2025-06-30
2 Austin Ligon Director 1,278,844 $14.45M $0 15 2025-06-30
3 Christopher John Nielsen Chief Financial Officer 489,859 $5.54M -$10.90M 83 2025-05-29
4 Bridget Frey Chief Technology Officer 481,077 $5.44M -$13.52M 90 2025-06-25
5 Selina Tobaccowala Director 173,400 $1.96M -$833.7K 26 2025-06-30
6 Anna Stevens Chief Human Resources Officer 169,118 $1.91M -$548.1K 14 2025-06-26
7 David H Lissy Director 133,573 $1.51M $713.0K 16 2025-06-30
8 Bradley E Singer Director 125,477 $1.42M $560.1K 10 2025-06-30
9 Jason Aleem Chief of Real Estate Services 109,732 $1.24M $0 7 2025-06-25
10 Christian John Taubman Chief Growth Officer 90,395 $1.02M -$1.22M 36 2025-06-25
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.

RDFN Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Jul 3, 2025
The company's insiders have not filed since Jul 3, 2025; this reflects that date.

Directors 1

Officers 4

  • Adam Wiener · President of Real Estate Ops. · listed since Apr 2021
  • Ee Lyn Khoo · Chief Human Resources Officer · since Jan 11, 2021
  • Anna Stevens · Chief Human Resources Officer · since Aug 1, 2022
  • Scott Nagel · Pres. of Strategic Initiatives · listed since May 2021

10% owners 3

Changes in the last 10 years (82)
Jul 3, 2025Selina Tobaccowala reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Robert J Bass reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Kerry D Chandler reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Julie Bornstein reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Jason Aleem reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief of Real Estate Services
Jul 3, 2025James Slavet reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Glenn Kelman reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Glenn Kelman reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Executive Officer
Jul 3, 2025David H Lissy reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Christopher John Nielsen reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Financial Officer
Jul 3, 2025Christian John Taubman reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Growth Officer
Jul 3, 2025Bridget Frey reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Technology Officer
Jul 3, 2025Bradley E Singer reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Austin Ligon reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director
Jul 3, 2025Anthony Ray Kappus reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Legal Officer
Apr 21, 2024Jason Aleem became Chief of Real Estate Services
Aug 1, 2022Anna Stevens became Chief Human Resources Officer
Mar 29, 2022Bradley E Singer became a director
Mar 28, 2022The company announced the departure of Robert J Mylod Jr from the board in an SEC filing
May 24, 2021Scott Nagel listed as Pres. of Strategic Initiatives (previously President of Real Estate Ops) in SEC filings
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.

RDFN Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)

Latest: 2025-06-20
Last 30d: 0 filings  ·  Last 90d: 0 filings

What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.

How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.

10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.

"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.

Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.

Filed Filer Role Shares Notice Value Planned Sale Broker Plan Link
2025-06-20 CHRISTIAN TAUBMAN Officer 11,895 $130.0K 2025-06-20 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2025-03-21 CHRISTIAN TAUBMAN Officer 16,209 $180.7K 2025-03-21 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2025-03-10 BRIDGET FREY Officer 135,333 $1.35M 2025-03-10 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2025-03-04 ANTHONY KAPPUS Officer 22,189 $132.0K 2025-03-04 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-12-23 CHRISTIAN TAUBMAN Officer 16,333 $137.8K 2024-12-23 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-11-25 BRIDGET FREY Officer 21,454 $214.5K 2024-11-25 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-11-22 ANTHONY KAPPUS Officer 8,417 $71.0K 2024-11-22 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-08-23 BRIDGET FREY Officer 17,039 $170.4K 2024-08-23 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-08-21 ANTHONY KAPPUS Officer 8,417 $78.0K 2024-08-21 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
2024-05-21 ANNA STEVENS Officer 11,632 $81.0K 2024-05-21 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … 10b5-1 EDGAR
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Short Interest & Float

Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.

Metric definitions
  • Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
  • SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
  • Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
  • Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
  • Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
  • Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
  • SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
  • 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
  • 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
  • >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
  • Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
  • Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
  • A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.

Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.

Short Interest
28.29M
SI % of Float
22.10%
Days to Cover
3.49
Short Vol Ratio
46.2%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2025-06-30 • Short volume 2025-06-30