TLF Tandy Leather Factory, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- LEATHER & LEATHER PRODUCTS (3100) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 538
- List Date
- 1986-08-01
- CIK
- 0000909724
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-09
- Headquarters
- Ft Worth, TX
- Homepage
- https://www.tandyleather.com
Tandy Leather Factory Inc is a specialty retailers of leather and leathercraft-related items. Its primary line of business is the sale of leather, leather crafts, and related supplies. Its broad line of leather and related products includes leather, leatherworking tools, leather dyes and finishes, and do-it-yourself kits. Its products include Leather, tools, Hardware, Supplies, Kits, Books and Patterns, and Gift cards. The company sells its products primarily through company-owned stores and through orders generated from its global websites, and through direct account representatives in its co…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -2.11% | -7.28% | 1.99% | 5.17% | -0.56% |
| Feb | -- | 0.23% | 2.24% | -32.79% | -15.96% | -11.57% |
| Mar | -- | 4.91% | 4.96% | -9.09% | -2.94% | -0.54% |
| Apr | -- | -5.61% | 2.15% | -1.77% | -2.90% | -2.03% |
| May | -- | -4.64% | 1.72% | 6.51% | 0.43% | 1.01% |
| Jun | -- | -1.61% | -1.96% | 0.98% | -1.27% | -0.97% |
| Jul | -- | -2.56% | -1.34% | 10.79% | -0.42% | 1.62% |
| Aug | -- | 2.38% | -2.37% | -12.55% | 10.55% | -0.50% |
| Sep | -40.98% | -3.22% | 1.70% | -0.66% | -5.87% | -9.81% |
| Oct | 15.77% | -1.18% | 5.81% | 0.63% | -7.70%* | 2.67% |
| Nov | 12.07% | -3.06% | -2.62% | -10.78% | -- | -1.10% |
| Dec | -12.10% | 4.16% | 17.69% | -1.08% | -- | 2.17% |
| Total | -32.69% | -12.18% | 20.41% | -43.72% | -21.00% | -17.84% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: TLF
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level: 6/10)
Key drivers:
- Recent news sentiment impact from positive dividend announcement
- Technical signals indicate a neutral range-bound market with no clear direction
Primary risks:
- Earnings misses or guidance concerns may impact stock price
- Volatility remains relatively low, indicating limited price movement
Investment thesis: TLF's recent dividend announcement and stable technical indicators suggest a possible trading range. However, the lack of earnings data and options activity limits our understanding of potential catalysts.
Recent news sentiment impact: The positive dividend announcement has contributed to a slightly bullish tone in recent news headlines.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Neutral Medium-term: Uptrend (SMA 50 > SMA 20) Long-term: Downtrend (SMA 200 < current price)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.46
- Middle Bollinger Band: $2.37
- Lower Bollinger Band: $2.28
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (48.13) MACD signal: Bullish (0.00 / Signal: 0.00 / Histogram: 0.00)
Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price touching middle band)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 44357.35
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1719786.32
- Volume Rate of Change: 168.89%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news sentiment from dividend announcement, mixed signals from other recent headlines.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (4 positive news articles, 2 negative news articles)
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings report may provide insight into company's performance and future guidance.
Market Narrative: Recent price action has been range-bound, with no clear direction or catalyst driving significant moves.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low volatility - stock moves less than market (beta: 0.11)
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels indicate a relatively low-volatile regime.
Options Market Signals: No options data available to analyze.
Downside Protection: Support levels: SMA 20 ($2.37), Lower Bollinger Band ($2.28)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Neutral, with no significant movement in the sector.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but data is limited due to lack of options activity.
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation: Low correlation between TLF and market (0.03)
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, slightly below SMA 50 ($2.35).
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $2.28
- Middle Bollinger Band: $2.37
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.46
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: SMA 50 ($2.35) and SMA 20 ($2.37)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings report (date unavailable).
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at the Lower Bollinger Band ($2.28), with position sizing considerations based on risk tolerance.
By analyzing these data points, we can conclude that TLF is currently in a neutral range-bound market with no clear direction or catalyst driving significant moves. The recent dividend announcement has contributed to a slightly bullish tone, but the lack of earnings data and options activity limits our understanding of potential catalysts. A wait-and-see approach may be prudent, with a focus on monitoring key levels and reacting to any significant price movements.
TLF Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $63K | #3030 of 3138 | +61.1% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
TLF Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
TLF Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-11| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-11 | Diana Saadeh-Jajeh | Director | Mixed | +11,937 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | John Richmond Sullivan | Director | Mixed | +10,371 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Victoria Marie Cantrell | Director | Mixed | +12,749 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-11 | Johnathan Lee Gehre | Director | Mixed | +10,371 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-09 | Victoria Marie Cantrell | Director | Exer (M) | +1,512 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-08 | Victoria Marie Cantrell | Director | Exer (M) | +783 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-08 | Diana Saadeh-Jajeh | Director | Exer (M) | +783 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-04 | Victoria Marie Cantrell | Director | — | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-04 | Diana Saadeh-Jajeh | Director | — | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-04 | Johnathan Lee Gehre | Director | — | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-04 | John Richmond Sullivan | Director | — | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-01 | Lars Johan Hedberg | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | +60,650 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-10-05 | Janet A Carr | CEO | Mixed | +57,638 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-06-08 | James C Pappas | Director | Award (A) | +2,800 | $2800.00 | $7.84M | EDGAR |
| 2022-06-08 | William M Warren | Director | Award (A) | +2,800 | $2800.00 | $7.84M | EDGAR |
TLF Insider Holdings
5 insiders · @ $2.28| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lars Johan Hedberg | Chief Executive Officer | 100,000 | $228.0K | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-01 |
| 2 | Victoria Marie Cantrell | Director | 23,221 | $52.9K | $0 | 9 | 2026-06-11 |
| 3 | Diana Saadeh-Jajeh | Director | 7,601 | $17.3K | $0 | 3 | 2026-06-11 |
| 4 | Johnathan Lee Gehre | Director | 6,035 | $13.8K | $0 | 2 | 2026-06-11 |
| 5 | John Richmond Sullivan | Director | 6,035 | $13.8K | $0 | 2 | 2026-06-11 |
TLF Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 11, 2026Directors 6
- Jefferson Gramm · listed since Mar 2016
- Victoria Marie Cantrell · since Jun 6, 2017
- Lars Johan Hedberg · on file since May 2026
- Diana Saadeh-Jajeh · on file since May 2026
- John Richmond Sullivan · on file since May 2026
- Johnathan Lee Gehre · on file since May 2026
Officers 1
- Lars Johan Hedberg · Chief Executive Officer · on file since May 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (17)
| May 4, 2026 | Johnathan Lee Gehre first on file as a director |
| May 4, 2026 | John Richmond Sullivan first on file as a director |
| May 4, 2026 | Diana Saadeh-Jajeh first on file as a director |
| May 1, 2026 | Lars Johan Hedberg first on file as a director |
| May 1, 2026 | Lars Johan Hedberg first on file as Chief Executive Officer |
| May 16, 2022 | JCP Investment Management, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 4, 2019 | William M Warren no longer listed as Secretary in SEC filings |
| Oct 11, 2018 | Shannon L Greene no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Oct 11, 2018 | Shannon L Greene no longer listed as Cfo/treasurer in SEC filings |
| Oct 2, 2018 | Janet A Carr became a director |
| Oct 2, 2018 | Janet A Carr became CEO |
| Apr 13, 2018 | William M Warren first listed as Secretary in an SEC filing |
| Jun 6, 2017 | Victoria Marie Cantrell became a director |
| Jun 6, 2017 | Sharon M Leite became a director |
| Jun 6, 2017 | Sejal Vinu Patel became a director |
| Jun 6, 2017 | Brent Cornell Beshore became a director |
| Feb 7, 2017 | Tina L Castillo became Cfo/treasurer |
Not reported recently (13)
- James C Pappas · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 4, 2024
- Sejal Vinu Patel · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 4, 2024
- Janet A Carr · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 4, 2024
- William M Warren · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 8, 2022
- JCP Investment Management, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 26, 2022
- Tina L Castillo · Last reported as Cfo/treasurer in an SEC filing dated Feb 28, 2020
- Brent Cornell Beshore · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 26, 2020
- Sharon M Leite · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 26, 2020
- Gregory Bylinsky · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Apr 15, 2019
- Bandera Partners LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Apr 15, 2019
- T Field Lange · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 15, 2017
- Joseph R Mannes · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 22, 2017
- L Edward Martin III · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 24, 2017
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $256,833 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $99,904 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $15,493 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 4 | DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $8,453 | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 5 | DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $3,087 | $2.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 6 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.00% | $2,402 | — | 2026-10-23 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.