TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF
ETF 17.87 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $15.02 – $39.69
- YTD
- -44.74%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.22
- Straddle Price
- $2.03
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.32
- Open
- $17.64
- Day Range
- $17.55 – $18.37
- Volume
- 53,548
- Prev Close
- $18.32
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF (TSLW) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2025-02-18
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 0.99% prospectus, filed Apr 30, 2026
- Assets
- $101M SEC filing, Jun 30, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 72.43% paid weekly
- Average daily volume
- $1.8M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 4 top 10 are 98.6%
- Listed
- Feb 18, 2025 Cboe BZX
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (25% of its variance, beta 1.68); Value over growth (10% of its variance, beta -0.66); Bitcoin (5% of its variance, beta 0.14). These factors explain 42% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Funds primary investment objective is to pay weekly distributions. (from the fund's prospectus)
- Jun 2026
- −$1.6M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$193K −0.2% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$132M +131.0% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | −$1.6M |
| May 2026 | +$1.5M |
| Apr 2026 | −$14K |
| Mar 2026 | +$2.6M |
| Feb 2026 | −$9.6M |
| Jan 2026 | −$622K |
| Dec 2025 | −$7.3M |
| Nov 2025 | +$19M |
| Oct 2025 | +$66M |
| Sep 2025 | +$23M |
| Aug 2025 | +$18M |
| Jul 2025 | +$21M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 17 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEPIJPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | — | 0.35% | $46.0B | +0.3% | compare |
| JEPQJ.P. Morgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | — | 0.35% | $44.3B | +3.3% | compare |
| QQQINEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF | — | 0.68% | $13.1B | −1.9% | compare |
| SPYINEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | — | 0.68% | $10.4B | +1.4% | compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Funds Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | — | 0.60% | $8.4B | +6.5% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Covered Call category.
- Holdings vs fair value
- −34.1% 0% under, 100% over · 100% covered
- Price / earnings
- 389.3 0% loss-making · 100% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 17.0 · 14.2 revenue growth +0.5%
- Above 200-day average
- 0% 100% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 2.2% of float, weighted · 1.9 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 0% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 0% net selling
- 13F holders
- +0.5% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 0.0% of weight in 7 days; 0.0% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
- Authorized participants
- 4 active of 4 with agreements; top 3 did 99%
- Created · redeemed
- $173M · $14M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 80% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-20 | $0.1723 | CD |
| 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-14 | $0.1366 | CD |
| 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-06 | $0.1651 | CD |
| 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-29 | $0.1472 | CD |
| 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-22 | $0.1792 | CD |
| 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-15 | $0.1561 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | TREASURY BILL | 67.25% | Debt | US |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 19.62% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | N/A | 11.69% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | First American Government Obli | 1.54% | Short-term investment | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Treasury | 67.25% | $67.9M | 1 |
| Derivative (equity) | 11.69% | $11.8M | 1 |
| Short-term investment | 1.54% | $1.6M | 1 |
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 9.78% | -5.91% | 1.93% |
| Feb | -- | -11.68% | -7.88% | -9.78% |
| Mar | -- | -- | -12.50% | -12.50% |
| Apr | -- | -- | -4.13% | -4.13% |
| May | -- | -- | 9.50% | 9.50% |
| Jun | -- | -13.50% | -2.90% | -8.20% |
| Jul | -- | -2.47% | -34.44% | -18.45% |
| Aug | -- | 4.98% | 12.40% | 8.69% |
| Sep | 36.82% | 34.70% | -4.38% | 22.38% |
| Oct | -7.11% | -9.15% | 5.12%* | -3.71% |
| Nov | 58.49% | -13.38% | -- | 22.55% |
| Dec | 18.47% | -0.53% | -- | 8.97% |
| Total | 138.63% | -9.46% | -42.74% | 28.81% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is the LLM Stock Analysis Report:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a weak trend with bearish momentum
- High volatility and beta indicate increased risk
- Recent news headlines are unavailable, making it difficult to assess sentiment
Primary Risks:
- Potential downside move due to high volatility and bearish momentum
- Lack of recent news headlines increases uncertainty
2-3 Sentence Investment Thesis:
TSLW is in a weak trend with bearish momentum, indicating potential for further declines. The stock's high beta and volatility suggest increased risk, making it essential to monitor price action closely.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: N/A (no recent news available)
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages and technical patterns:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $16.47
- Middle Bollinger Band: $17.61
- Upper Bollinger Band: $18.76
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (47.75) with potential for further declines
- MACD signal: Bearish crossover
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, indicating potential breakout or mean reversion
- Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals:
- Volume SMA 20: 68667.47
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 868237.89
- Volume Rate of Change: 107.25%
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: N/A (no recent news available)
- Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (no recent news available)
- Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or earnings dates mentioned
- Market Narrative: The lack of recent news headlines creates uncertainty, making it difficult to assess sentiment
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta: 2.68 >1.5)
- Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels
- Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Low (0.0%)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: Neutral (1.00)
- Unusual activity: No notable calls or puts
- Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $16.47
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: N/A (no sector information provided)
- Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest:
- Volume SMA 20: 68667.47
- Correlation Analysis: How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): Correlation is relatively high at 0.61
- Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: N/A (no valuation information provided)
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance to monitor:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $16.47
- Middle Bollinger Band: $17.61
- Upper Bollinger Band: $18.76
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: N/A (no specific levels provided)
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates, FDA approvals, product launches: No upcoming events or earnings dates mentioned
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations:
- Set stop-loss below the Lower Bollinger Band ($16.47) to manage risk
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of TSLW's technical indicators, news sentiment, risk metrics, and market positioning. The assessment highlights the stock's bearish momentum, high volatility, and increased risk due to its high beta.
TSLW Options Activity & IV Rank
TSLW IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 34th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
TSLW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $406.30K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 19.62% | $379.63 | -1.77% | +4.74% | +0.45% |