VEEAW Veea Inc. Warrant
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN (7373) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 45
- List Date
- 2024-09-17
- CIK
- 0001840317
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.veea.com
Veea Inc is a company providing an edge platform having extensive knowledge and expertise on content delivery and edge computing, and has brought a broad range of Wi-Fi, 4G/5G mobile wireless, and IoT products to market over the past two decades. The company has first-in-class VeeaHub smart connectivity and computing hubs that integrate a full range of connectivity options, application processing power, and a full security stack to form an elastic edge computing platform with a dynamic connectivity and application mesh that can easily be deployed and centrally managed from the cloud.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -46.66% | 51.33% | 2.34% |
| Feb | -- | 0.00% | -10.00% | -5.00% |
| Mar | -- | -15.31% | -2.20% | -8.76% |
| Apr | -- | 28.25% | -6.11% | 11.07% |
| May | -- | 98.05% | 9.79% | 53.92% |
| Jun | -- | -25.68% | 13.43% | -6.12% |
| Jul | -- | 47.53% | 30.68% | 39.11% |
| Aug | -- | -47.37% | -58.26% | -52.81% |
| Sep | -4.00% | -36.36% | -56.80% | -32.39% |
| Oct | -22.98% | 23.42% | 47.06%* | 15.83% |
| Nov | -17.50% | -17.36% | -- | -17.43% |
| Dec | 10.42% | 99.00% | -- | 54.71% |
| Total | -32.64% | -14.47% | -46.03% | -31.05% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: VEEAW
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH (confidence level 6/10)
Key drivers:
- Technical signals indicate a bearish trend, with multiple indicators pointing to a potential reversal.
- High volatility and beta suggest increased risk.
Primary risks:
- Overbought conditions in RSI and Stochastic Oscillators may lead to a pullback.
- MACD signal line has crossed below the zero line, indicating bearish momentum.
Investment thesis: VEEAW is experiencing strong technical selling pressure, which may continue unless the company can address market concerns. Recent news headlines have been overwhelmingly positive, but the stock's price action suggests a disconnect between fundamental and technical signals.
Recent news sentiment impact: The recent news has had a neutral impact on the stock price, as the bearish trend continues despite the positive headlines.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH; Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL; Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower: $0.06 (Bollinger Band lower)
- Middle: $0.09 (SMA 50 and EMA 26)
Momentum Signals: RSI: Overbought (>70) at 56.40 MACD: Bearish crossover (signal line below zero) Stochastic %K/D: Neutral (72.98, 49.99)
Volume Analysis: Volume has been increasing, with a volume rate of change indicating higher participation.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines have focused on the company's innovative products and partnerships.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is POSITIVE (6/10).
Catalyst Identification: No imminent catalysts are identified, but future earnings reports or product launches could impact the stock price.
Market Narrative: Technical signals suggest a disconnect between fundamental and technical trends. The market may be overreacting to recent positive news.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.5).
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is high, with IV premium indicating implied richness.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $0.06 and $0.09 are key to managing potential losses.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: VEEAW's performance is mixed compared to its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest in the stock.
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation indicates a low correlation between VEEAW and market (0.20).
Relative Valuation: The stock is positioned within a trading range, with no clear buy or sell signal.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance at $0.06 and $0.09
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No imminent catalysts identified
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels around $0.07, position sizing considerations
Additional Insights
- The company's recent news headlines have been overwhelmingly positive, but the stock price has not reacted accordingly.
- Technical indicators suggest a bearish trend, with multiple signals pointing to potential reversal.
By analyzing the data provided, I conclude that VEEAW is experiencing strong technical selling pressure, which may continue unless the company can address market concerns. The recent news headlines have had a neutral impact on the stock price, but the disconnect between fundamental and technical trends suggests caution is warranted.
VEEAW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 123
Period: 252 trading days
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
VEEAW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $14.28K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
VEEAW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-10-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-02 | Mark Tubinis | Chief Commercial Officer | Grant (A) | +125,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Michael Salmasi | See Remarks | Grant (A) | +75,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Helder Fragueiro Antunes | See Remarks | Grant (A) | +110,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-08-27 | Allen Salmasi | Chief Executive Officer | Other (J) | +20,956,384 | $1.00 | $20.96M | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-19 | Janice K. Smith | COO and Interim CFO | Award (A) | +23,007 | $0.00 | $12 | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-06 | Gary A. Cohen | Director | Award (A) | +81,116 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-06 | Allen Salmasi | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +3,036,308 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-06 | Douglas L Maine | Director | Award (A) | +81,116 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-06 | Kanishka Roy | Director | Other (J) | +2,182,001 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-06 | Helder Fragueiro Antunes | Director | Award (A) | +81,116 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-06 | Alan J Black | Director | Other (J) | +120,836 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-09-25 | Janice K. Smith | COO and Interim CFO | Mixed | +18,857 | $4.83 | -$2 | EDGAR |
VEEAW Insider Holdings
7 insiders · @ $0.05| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allen Salmasi | Chief Executive Officer | 38,512,597 | $1.93M | $0 | 2 | 2025-08-27 |
| 2 | Kanishka Roy | Director | 2,232,001 | $111.6K | $0 | 1 | 2025-01-06 |
| 3 | Douglas L Maine | Director | 106,008 | $5.3K | $0 | 1 | 2025-01-06 |
| 4 | Helder Fragueiro Antunes | See Remarks | 101,116 | $5.1K | $0 | 2 | 2025-10-02 |
| 5 | Janice K. Smith | COO and Interim CFO | 100,509 | $5.0K | $0 | 2 | 2025-03-19 |
| 6 | Alan J Black | Director | 81,116 | $4.1K | $0 | 1 | 2025-01-06 |
| 7 | Gary A. Cohen | Director | 81,116 | $4.1K | $0 | 1 | 2025-01-06 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.