ZOOZ ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

ZOOZ — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
MISC INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (3590) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.0B
Employees
8
List Date
2022-09-08
CIK
0001992818
Homepage
https://www.zoozpower.com

Zooz Strategy Ltd is a provider of flywheel-based power boosting and power management solutions, enabling widespread deployment of ultra-fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. The company offers charging power boosters (ZOOZTER-100) based on kinetic energy storage using flywheels, offering 100kW of additional power, enabling ultra-fast charging by significantly increasing the available grid power. These charging boosters are mainly used by charging point operators, electric vehicle fleet owners, property owners, and automotive and utilities industry participants. Additionally, the…

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
'24'25'26Avg
Jan---7.79%-5.93%-6.86%
Feb---32.89%-13.28%-23.09%
Mar---3.27%-20.01%-11.64%
Apr-28.54%-13.59%3.02%-13.04%
May-9.37%-34.14%-1.62%-15.04%
Jun-17.16%-10.23%-8.88%-12.09%
Jul-16.67%46.80%-4.40%8.58%
Aug6.88%23.65%32.48%21.00%
Sep-0.99%-1.83%15.09%4.09%
Oct27.65%-31.88%-21.63%-8.62%
Nov21.63%-21.27%-1.27%*-0.30%
Dec-17.79%-17.36%---17.57%
Total-39.61%-75.85%-32.03%-49.17%
* Only 3 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $5.96
SMA 50: $6.76
SMA 200: $6.45
Current: $5.43
EMA 12: $5.67
EMA 26: $6.06
MACD: -0.3940 | Signal: -0.0665
BEARISH
ADX (14): 11.77
RANGE
+DI: 23.96
−DI: 25.08

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 41.99
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 13.62
Stoch %D: 14.88
Williams %R: -79.81

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $6.93
BB Lower: $5.00
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,566,199
Vol SMA 20: 12,199
Vol ROC: -19.50%
ATR: $0.53
True Range: $0.39
HV 20: 103.3%
HV 30: 98.9%
HV 60: 105.6%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-31T00:00:00 – 2026-11-10T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: ZOOZ

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)

Key Drivers: High volatility, mixed technical signals, and recent bearish news sentiment.

Primary Risks: Earnings miss, regulatory issues, or a decline in demand for electric vehicle charging solutions.

Investment Thesis: ZOOZ's high beta and volatile price action make it an attractive target for short-sellers. However, the company's strong sales growth in its ultra-fast EV charging business could attract value investors looking to buy on dips.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: Neutral (due to lack of recent news sentiment)

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction:

  • Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL
  • Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
  • Long-term (3-12 months): NEUTRAL

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $6.02 (key support level)
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $7.59 (key resistance level)

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: OVERBOUGHT (>70) - potential sell signal
  • MACD signal: BULLISH crossover (above signal line)
  • Bollinger Bands position: OVERBOUGHT (price touching upper band)

Volume Analysis:

  • Volume SMA 20: 36492.24 (increasing volume suggests trend continuation)
  • On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1689196.37 (suggests institutional buying interest)

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news sentiment surrounding ZOOZ's electric vehicle charging business, but no recent news headlines available.

Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL (due to lack of recent news headlines)

Catalyst Identification: No immediate catalysts identified. However, earnings release and regulatory updates could impact stock price in the near future.

Market Narrative: ZOOZ's high volatility and mixed technical signals suggest a market narrative centered around the company's growth prospects and valuation multiples.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: High-risk stock with beta >1.5, suggesting high volatility and correlation with broader market trends.

Volatility Regime: HIGH VOLATILITY (0.99) - stock price moves more than market expectations.

Options Market Signals:

  • IV rank: N/A (no options data available)
  • Put/call ratios: N/A (no options data available)
  • Unusual activity: N/A (no options data available)

Downside Protection: SMA 20 at $6.02 provides key support level, while upper Bollinger Band at $7.59 serves as a resistance level.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: ZOOZ's electric vehicle charging business is part of the growing "Clean Energy" sector, which has seen strong performance in recent months.

Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional buying interest, supporting the company's growth prospects.

Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation suggests a moderate correlation between ZOOZ and broader market trends (0.25).

Relative Valuation: ZOOZ is trading near its historical average valuation multiples, suggesting a relatively neutral positioning.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • SMA 20 at $6.02 - key support level
  • Upper Bollinger Band at $7.59 - key resistance level

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: SMA 50 at $5.58 and SMA 200 at $7.16 serve as potential breakout/breakdown levels.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings release and regulatory updates could impact stock price in the near future.

Risk Management: Consider using stop-loss orders or position sizing strategies to manage risk, especially during periods of high volatility.

Please note that this report is an analysis template and should not be used for actual investment decisions.

Generated
News
All ZOOZ news →

ZOOZ Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 2.2729
Alpha: -78.54%
Correlation: 0.3866
R-Squared: 14.9%
Stock Volatility: 80.7%
Market Volatility: 13.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 249
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

ZOOZ Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 4 already for 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

14 filers2,202,074 shares$12.29M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Newtyn Management, LLC 537,499 $2.98M 24.24% — 2026-06-30
2 Arrington Capital Management, LLC 498,368 $2.76M 22.47% — 2026-06-30
3 KEYWISE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (HK) Ltd 400,000 $2.22M 18.04% — 2026-06-30
4 MMCAP International Inc. SPC 350,000 $1.94M 15.78% — 2026-06-30
5 Pantera Capital Partners LP 212,500 $1.18M 9.58% — 2026-06-30
6 MACQUARIE GROUP LTD 108,815 $602.84K 4.91% — 2026-06-30
7 Y.D. More Investments Ltd 36,100 $267.29K 2.18% — 2026-09-30
8 Accurate Wealth Management, LLC 16,332 $109.10K 0.89% — 2026-09-30
9 DG Capital Management, LLC 18,666 $103.41K 0.84% — 2026-06-30
10 Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian 13,221 $73.24K 0.60% — 2026-06-30
11 UBS Group AG Custodian 10,459 $57.94K 0.47% — 2026-06-30
12 Barclays PLC Custodian 69 $505 <0.01% — 2026-09-30
13 JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian 41 $232 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
14 Caitong International Asset Management Co., Ltd 4 $29 <0.01% — 2026-09-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

ZOOZ Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Apr 29, 2026

Directors 6

Officers 2

  • Jordan Evan Fried · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
  • Rousso Ruth Smadja · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (8)
Mar 18, 2026Ying Christine Zhao became a director
Mar 18, 2026Todd S Thomson became a director
Mar 18, 2026Rousso Ruth Smadja became Chief Financial Officer
Mar 18, 2026Jordan Evan Fried became a director
Mar 18, 2026Jordan Evan Fried became Chief Executive Officer
Mar 18, 2026Jonas Grossman became a director
Mar 18, 2026Avi Cohen became a director
Mar 18, 2026Alberto Franco became a director
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

ZOOZ vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
ETN Eaton Corporation, plc Ordinary Shares $139.6B 35.5 +20.1% +8.2% 56
CW Curtiss-Wright Corp. $17.5B 31.9 +10.7% −16.5% 43
MOG.A Moog Inc. $10.8B 29.0 +15.7% +37.1% 72
MOG.B MOOG INC CL B $10.3B — — +33.3% —
EPAC Enerpac Tool Group Corp. $2.1B 23.1 +5.7% +0.5% 58
SHMD SCHMID Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Share $164M — — −66.7% 16
ZOOZ ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. Ordinary Shares $42M — — −44.5% —
VHUB VenHub Global, Inc. Common Stock $22M — — −96.6% —
LIQT LiqTech International, Inc. $10M — −0.2% −79.8% —
Peer median $6.2B 30.4 +10.7% −8.0% 56

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.