GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·1mo ago
SHMD SCHMID Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Shares
XNAS
2.85
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
SHMD
$2.85
—
Key stats
$2.85
- 52-Week Range
- $2.77 – $10.65
- YTD
- -61.93%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 29.29
- Straddle Price
- $1.03
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 3.33
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Open
- $2.99
- Day Range
- $2.79 – $2.99
- Volume
- 239,230
- Prev Close
- $3.11
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.87 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.50% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.34% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +150.8pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $3.88 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $3.89 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1692.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
60-Day Conviction
34%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 20, 2026
$2.92
α +1.3%
rank 85%
conviction
73%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 21, 2026
$2.93
α +1.6%
rank 79%
conviction
51%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 19, 2027
$2.91
α +0.9%
rank 78%
conviction
34%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $3.88 | 100% | stability 63% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- MISC INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (3590) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Employees
- 734
- List Date
- 2024-05-01
- CIK
- 0001987240
- Homepage
- https://www.schmid-group.com
Schmid Group NV is a supplier of equipment, software and services for various industries such as printed circuit board (PCB), substrate manufacturing, photovoltaics, and glass and energy storage with a focus on the highest end of this market in terms of technology and performance. It focuses on a modular product portfolio of machinery to use in the manufacturing of high-end PCB equipment and semiconductor packaging devices which includes common flexible circuit fabrication techniques such as subtractive, semi-additive processes (SAP) and modified semi-additive processes (mSAP).
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -35.58% | 20.27% | -7.65% |
| Feb | -- | 30.65% | -34.55% | -1.95% |
| Mar | -- | 55.91% | -22.63% | 16.64% |
| Apr | -- | 8.00% | 15.85% | 11.93% |
| May | -3.09% | -31.51% | 4.71% | -9.96% |
| Jun | -8.79% | 9.92% | -5.72% | -1.53% |
| Jul | 4.88% | 6.06% | -33.77% | -7.61% |
| Aug | -15.63% | -5.18% | -27.58% | -16.13% |
| Sep | -7.27% | 9.59% | 56.27% | 19.53% |
| Oct | -20.00% | 51.72% | -35.32%* | -1.20% |
| Nov | -19.86% | -3.96% | -- | -11.91% |
| Dec | 31.06% | 33.23% | -- | 32.14% |
| Total | -39.06% | 128.27% | -66.23% | 7.66% |
* Only 3 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $3.85
SMA 50: $3.83
SMA 200: $5.77
Current: $2.85
EMA 12: $3.33
EMA 26: $3.60
MACD: -0.2753 | Signal: -0.1261
BEARISH
ADX (14): 22.10
WEAK TREND
+DI: 18.84
−DI: 29.28
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 35.27
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 11.86
Stoch %D: 10.19
Williams %R: -95.56
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $5.21
BB Lower: $2.50
NEUTRAL
OBV: 9,081,596
Vol SMA 20: 1,814,826
Vol ROC: -76.33%
ATR: $0.37
True Range: $0.31
HV 20: 123.0%
HV 30: 107.5%
HV 60: 121.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
SHMD Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH | Confidence Level: 6/10
Investment Thesis: SHMD is a highly volatile specialty equipment manufacturer (SCHMID Group) trading 49% below its 200-day moving average in a weak downtrend. While recent news includes positive order wins and innovation awards, the stock faces significant headwinds: deteriorating momentum, weak technical structure, litigation concerns, and a 3.8x market beta indicating elevated systemic risk. The oversold technical conditions present a potential oversold bounce opportunity, but lack conviction in a sustained recovery without positive catalysts.
Key Drivers & Primary Risks:
- Drivers: Recent major PLP/mSAP equipment orders (Nov 2025), innovation award (Nov 2025), H1 2026 guidance update
- Risks: 49% drawdown from 200-day MA, litigation investigation (Dec 2025), China campus expansion concerns (Jun 2026), weak trend structure with strong downside pressure (-DI 28.93 vs +DI 15.56)
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Mixed signals with 2 positive recent catalysts (major orders, innovation award) offset by 2 negative narratives (litigation investigation, China expansion concerns). The most recent data point (Aug 2026 H1 results) is neutral. However, the stock's severe price weakness despite positive operational news suggests market skepticism or undisclosed concerns.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Status | Assessment | |-----------|--------|------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | BEARISH | Price at $2.98 vs SMA20 ($4.02) = 26% below 20-day MA; EMA12 ($3.82) also rejected; weak ADX 20.68 = directionless but downward-biased | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BEARISH | Price 26% below SMA50 ($4.03); strong downtrend structure evident; -DI (28.93) dominates +DI (15.56) by 85% | | Long-term (3-12 months) | STRONGLY BEARISH | Price 49% below SMA200 ($5.87); extended bear market phase; no signs of structural recovery initiation |
Support & Resistance Levels
Critical Support:
- $3.06 – Bollinger Band lower band (current price just $0.08 above); critical floor
- $2.80-$2.85 – Technical support (not shown but implied by recent floor behavior)
- $2.50 – Potential capitulation level (~57% from 200-MA)
Resistance:
- $3.50 – Immediate resistance (~18% above current)
- $4.02 – SMA20/middle Bollinger Band (psychological/technical confluence)
- $4.99 – Upper Bollinger Band (major resistance; 68% above current)
- $5.87 – SMA200 (recovery target if longer-term reversal initiates)
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 33.64 – Neutral zone approaching oversold (<30)
- Approaching oversold territory but not yet at capitulation levels
- Suggests room for further downside compression before potential reversal
- No divergence signals yet; momentum is consistently weak
MACD: -0.09 vs Signal: -0.13 | Histogram: +0.04 – BULLISH DIVERGENCE FORMING
- MACD above signal line for first time after sustained weakness
- Histogram positive indicates early momentum inflection
- This is the only bullish technical signal present but from depressed levels
- Suggests potential bottoming in momentum, not immediate recovery confirmation
Bollinger Bands: OVERSOLD
- Price at $2.98 vs lower band $3.06 = price 97% of the way down within bands
- Width 47.97% indicates volatility compression after volatility expansion
- Typically precedes mean reversion; historically oversold positions often bounce
- However, extended downtrends can stay oversold longer than expected
Stochastic %K: 8.64 / %D: 14.33 – SEVERE OVERSOLD
- %K in extreme territory (<20 = oversold threshold)
- %D also depressed (typically 20-80 range)
- Raw oversold conditions, but not yet showing upward crossover
- Suggests potential exhaustion but not yet reversal confirmation
Williams %R: -97.89 – EXTREME OVERSOLD
- -97.89 is near maximum oversold reading (-100 = absolute floor)
- Indicates intraday weakness and selling pressure persistence
- Reversal candidates typically form when indicator rises above -80
Volume Analysis
Volume Trend: DETERIORATING
- Volume SMA 20: 1,612,103 shares/day baseline
- Volume Rate of Change: -51.65% – Volume trending 52% below recent average
- Bearish Signal: Declining volume on down moves typically indicates lack of institutional conviction to sell, potentially preceding consolidation. However, light volume also means fewer buyers stepping in.
On-Balance Volume (OBV): 7,023,961
- OBV context: Accumulated volume metric; without historical comparison, absolute value less informative
- Declining volume on downtrend could suggest institutional disinterest rather than panic selling
- Lack of capitulation-level volume suggests liquidation may be orderly rather than climactic
Interpretation: The -51.65% volume decline on weakness is moderately bullish for eventual recovery (suggests sellers exhausted), but lack of heavy capitulation volume means reversal conviction is lower.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
| Date | Headline | Sentiment | Relevance | |------|----------|-----------|-----------| | Aug 25, 2026 | H1 2026 Results & FY Guidance Update | NEUTRAL | Operational update; no surprise indicated | | Jun 9, 2026 | China Campus Plans Weigh on Stock | NEGATIVE | Expansion concerns; market skeptical | | Dec 30, 2025 | Pomerantz Litigation Investigation | NEGATIVE | Material Risk: Legal investigation suggests potential shareholder claims (accounting, disclosure, or securities issues) | | Nov 18, 2025 | Innovation Award (InfinityLine L+) | POSITIVE | Product validation; industry recognition | | Nov 10, 2025 | Major Orders for PLP/mSAP Equipment | POSITIVE | Revenue Driver: Significant orders secured for specialty packaging equipment; strong demand signal | | May 21, 2025 | Order Update & Market Development | POSITIVE | Market strength noted; forward guidance optimistic |
Sentiment Assessment: MIXED-TO-NEGATIVE
Sentiment Breakdown:
- Positive: 3 headlines (innovation, major orders, market development)
- Negative: 2 headlines (litigation, China expansion concerns)
- Neutral: 1 headline (recent results)
Aggregate Scoring: 50% positive, 33% negative, 17% neutral
Critical Conflict: Despite positive operational catalysts (major orders in Nov 2025, innovation award), stock has declined 49% from 200-MA. This suggests:
- Market is pricing in litigation risk not reflected in headlines
- China expansion plans seen as dilutive despite management positioning
- Order visibility may be questioned by market participants
- Potential guidance disappointment in Aug 2026 update
Catalyst Identification
Immediate (1-7 days):
- Litigation investigation resolution/updates (Dec 2025 investigation – status unclear)
- Daily mean reversion bounce given extreme oversold technicals
Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Order fulfillment updates and revenue recognition
- Market acceptance of China campus strategy
Medium-term (1-3 months):
- Q4 2026 earnings or next guidance update
- Major equipment delivery milestones for recent PLP/mSAP orders
- Litigation settlement or dismissal announcements
Market Narrative Analysis
Technical vs News Divergence: CRITICAL CONFLICT
- News Narrative: Growth equipment manufacturer securing major orders, winning innovation awards, expanding capacity
- Technical Reality: Stock in bear market phase, down 49% from 200-MA, momentum weak despite oversold conditions
- Interpretation: Market is either (a) ahead of itself on negative litigation risks, or (b) skeptical of order quality/timing. The litigation investigation (Dec 2025) appears to be the primary overhang not fully
Generated
News
All SHMD news →
BenzingaT3·4mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·9mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·11mo ago
BenzingaT3·11mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·17mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·29mo ago
SHMD Options Activity & IV Rank
SHMD IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 170.3%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $1.03
7-DTE Move: $1.03
Days to Exp: 29 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 12
Put Volume: 40
P/C Volume: 3.333
BEARISH
Call OI: 325
Put OI: 204
P/C OI: 0.628
Total OI: 529
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.80
ATM Put: $0.23
Call %: 28.0%
Put %: 7.9%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 507
Chain OI: 7,322
Last Updated: 10/22/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 46th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
46%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.63
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.76
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.79
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.76: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.79: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 4 ATM contracts, 3k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 165.6% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)29.3MediumOct 22
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$1.03Oct 22
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.7922
Alpha: -10.82%
Correlation: 0.3926
R-Squared: 15.4%
Stock Volatility: 122.8%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own SHMD
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $3.3M | #2292 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $111K | #5756 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SHMD Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
1 filers$70.74K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $70.74K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
1 filers$164.64K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $164.64K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
SHMD Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-02Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | Helmut Rauch | Mixed | +12,606 | $4.51 | $56.9K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-01 | Arthur Josef Hermann Schuetz | CFO Schmid Group N.V. | Mixed | +12,606 | $4.51 | $56.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-08 | Ralf Speth | Director | Mixed | +84,311 | $3.68 | $310.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Anette Schmid | Director | Buy (P) | +69,000 | $3.16 | $218.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Arthur Josef Hermann Schuetz | CFO Schmid Group N.V. | Buy (P) | +15,200 | $3.23 | $49.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Christian Mathias Schmid | CEO | Gift (G) | −330,000 | $4.26 | -$1.41M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Christian Mathias Schmid | CEO | Gift (G) | −330,000 | $4.26 | -$1.41M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | Christian Mathias Schmid | CEO | Gift (G) | −500,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-07 | Helmut Rauch | Gift (G) | +500,000 | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-06-24 | Annedore Streyl | Director | Sell (S) | −11,350 | $6.35 | -$72.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Annedore Streyl | Director | Sell (S) | −11 | $6.35 | -$72 | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
SHMD Insider Holdings
6 insiders · @ $2.85
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christian Mathias Schmid | CEO | 15,755,322 | $44.90M | $0 | 3 | 2026-08-07 |
| 2 | Anette Schmid | Director | 13,749,589 | $39.19M | $218.2K | 1 | 2026-08-31 |
| 3 | Helmut Rauch | 555,166 | $1.58M | $0 | 2 | 2026-10-02 | |
| 4 | Ralf Speth | Director | 236,311 | $673.5K | $214.3K | 1 | 2026-09-08 |
| 5 | Arthur Josef Hermann Schuetz | CFO Schmid Group N.V. | 53,512 | $152.5K | -$2.3K | 2 | 2026-10-01 |
| 6 | Annedore Streyl | Director | 18 | $51 | -$72.2K | 2 | 2026-06-24 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
SHMD Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 2, 2026Directors 6
- Stefan Berger · since Apr 30, 2024
- Anette Schmid · since Mar 18, 2026
- Annedore Streyl · since Mar 18, 2026
- Boo Keun Yoon · since Mar 18, 2026
- Christian Mathias Schmid · since Mar 18, 2026
- Ralf Speth · since Mar 18, 2026
Officers 2
- Christian Mathias Schmid · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Arthur Josef Hermann Schuetz · CFO Schmid Group N.V. · listed since May 2026
10% owners 2
- Anette Schmid · since Mar 18, 2026
- Christian Mathias Schmid · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (13)
| May 27, 2026 | Helmut Rauch no longer listed as COO of Issuers affiliate in SEC filings |
| May 27, 2026 | Arthur Josef Hermann Schuetz listed as CFO Schmid Group N.V. (previously CFO) in SEC filings |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Ralf Speth became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Helmut Rauch became COO of Issuers affiliate |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Christian Mathias Schmid became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Christian Mathias Schmid became a 10% owner |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Christian Mathias Schmid became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Boo Keun Yoon became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Arthur Josef Hermann Schuetz became CFO |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Annedore Streyl became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Anette Schmid became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Anette Schmid became a 10% owner |
| Apr 30, 2024 | Stefan Berger became a director |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
SHMD Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-10
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-10 | Berger Stefan | Director | 45,000 | $72.5K | 2026-06-10 | Charles Schwab Corp. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | Berger Stefan | Director | 10,000 | $72.4K | 2026-05-20 | Charles Schwab Corp | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-09 | Berger Stefan | Director | 584 | $3.5K | 2026-03-09 | Charles Schwab Corporation | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
2.40M
SI % of Float
8.80%
Days to Cover
1.07
Short Vol Ratio
45.1%
Free Float
27.26M
Float %
41.5%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21 • Float 2026-08-16