BKCI vs QLTI

BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF against GMO International Quality ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
QLTI is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.1 pts
QLTI is ahead
Larger fund
QLTI
$274M

Side by side

BKCIQLTI
FundBNY Mellon Concentrated International ETFGMO International Quality ETF
IssuerBNY MellonGMO
CategoryDeveloped ex-USDeveloped ex-US
Expense ratio0.65%0.60%
Assets$128M$274M
Average daily dollar volume$279K$507K
ListedDec 6, 2021Oct 28, 2024
FrenzyCap score3239
1-month return−0.5%+1.0%
3-month return−2.1%+0.7%
Year to date+1.2%+0.8%
1-year return−1.0%+3.1%
30-day volatility9.4%12.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.3%−13.7%
Trailing 12-month yield1.37%0.21%
Holdings2935
Top 10 weight49.0%42.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$5.3M thru Jul 2026+$14M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

18% of BKCI · 15% of QLTI
HoldingBKCIQLTI
TSM6.83%5.97%
AMADEUS IT GROUP SA3.94%3.81%
HOYA CORP4.30%2.57%
KONE CORP3.12%2.35%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBKCIQLTIGap
Technology6.8%10.0%−3.2%
Consumer Staples0.0%11.9%−11.9%
Health Care0.0%4.0%−4.0%
Industrials0.0%2.9%−2.9%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%1.7%−1.7%

More: full overlap table · BKCI holdings · QLTI holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.