BUYZ vs MVPA

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF against Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
8%
6 shared positions
Fee gap
10 bp
BUYZ is cheaper
1-year return gap
19.9 pts
MVPA is ahead
Larger fund
MVPA
$69M

Side by side

BUYZMVPA
FundFranklin Disruptive Commerce ETFMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
IssuerFranklin TempletonMiller
CategoryInternet & InnovationLarge Cap Value
Expense ratio0.50%0.60%
Assets$5.4M$69M
Average daily dollar volume$9K$25K
ListedFeb 25, 2020Jan 30, 2024
FrenzyCap score3226
1-month return+5.2%−4.1%
3-month return+3.6%+0.7%
Year to date−9.7%+5.3%
1-year return−17.6%+2.3%
30-day volatility20.5%15.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−29.2%−13.8%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.53%
Holdings5835
Top 10 weight49.2%53.1%
Look-through P/E28.814.6
Holdings vs fair value+3.7%+30.0%
Holdings above 200-day average65%71%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$1.8M thru Jun 2026+$4.4M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility22.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

10% of BUYZ · 20% of MVPA
HoldingBUYZMVPA
MELI3.26%4.45%
META3.88%2.54%
ABNB1.05%3.51%
CART1.04%3.28%
CPNG0.35%1.65%
FIGR0.07%4.25%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBUYZMVPAGap
Industrials31.8%22.0%+9.9%
Consumer Discretionary24.4%19.3%+5.1%
Technology23.7%4.5%+19.2%
Financials4.0%20.0%−16.1%
Communication Services4.5%8.2%−3.7%
Materials0.0%9.4%−9.4%
Energy0.0%7.8%−7.8%
Real Estate2.5%4.0%−1.5%
Health Care0.0%2.7%−2.7%

More: full overlap table · BUYZ holdings · MVPA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.