CDIG vs ONLN

City Different Investments Global Equity ETF against ProShares Online Retail ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
20%
5 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
ONLN is cheaper
1-year return gap
11.3 pts
CDIG is ahead
Larger fund
ONLN
$59M

Side by side

CDIGONLN
FundCity Different Investments Global Equity ETFProShares Online Retail ETF
IssuerCityProShares
CategoryGlobalInternet & Innovation
Expense ratio0.75%0.58%
Assets$45M$59M
Average daily dollar volume$161K$168K
ListedSep 16, 2025Jul 13, 2018
FrenzyCap score1829
1-month return−0.8%+3.1%
3-month return+2.2%+0.4%
Year to date+5.2%−3.3%
1-year return+4.4%−6.9%
30-day volatility15.0%20.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.3%−19.9%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.29%
Holdings2522
Top 10 weight60.8%67.9%
Look-through P/E40.141.9
Holdings vs fair value+13.2%+10.7%
Holdings above 200-day average44%61%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$6.9M thru Jul 2026+$92K thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—24.3%
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

27% of CDIG · 40% of ONLN
HoldingCDIGONLN
AMZN4.71%24.00%
CVNA8.80%4.46%
MELI7.12%4.16%
PDD3.67%4.49%
TDUP2.59%3.13%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCDIGONLNGap
Consumer Discretionary20.6%64.1%−43.5%
Industrials28.8%34.2%−5.4%
Materials11.9%0.0%+11.9%
Financials8.7%0.0%+8.7%
Utilities8.6%0.0%+8.6%
Communication Services2.8%0.0%+2.8%
Technology0.0%1.7%−1.7%

More: full overlap table · CDIG holdings · ONLN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.