CGRO vs KWEB

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF against KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
20%
6 shared positions
Fee gap
19 bp
KWEB is cheaper
1-year return gap
7.1 pts
KWEB is ahead
Larger fund
KWEB
$4.5B

Side by side

CGROKWEB
FundCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETFKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
IssuerCoreValuesKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.89%0.70%
Assets$1.6M$4.5B
Average daily dollar volume$19K$368M
ListedOct 2, 2023Jul 31, 2013
FrenzyCap score1261
1-month return−22.1%+2.0%
3-month return−23.3%−5.0%
Year to date−38.8%−26.8%
1-year return−48.1%−41.0%
30-day volatility63.0%24.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−49.8%−42.9%
Trailing 12-month yield29.94%8.41%
Holdings3234
Top 10 weight54.5%60.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$589K thru Jun 2026−$282M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—26.5%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

20% of CGRO · 37% of KWEB
HoldingCGROKWEB
Tencent Holdings Ltd8.84%10.44%
Meituan4.32%6.83%
Kuaishou Technology2.52%4.08%
PDD2.35%7.92%
Bilibili Inc0.93%3.65%
YMM0.74%4.15%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCGROKWEBGap
Industrials16.3%7.9%+8.4%
Consumer Discretionary10.8%5.4%+5.4%
Technology3.2%10.0%−6.8%
Communication Services0.0%3.4%−3.4%
Financials1.6%1.0%+0.7%
Real Estate1.1%0.0%+1.1%

More: full overlap table · CGRO holdings · KWEB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.