CHIQ vs KWEB

Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF against KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
34%
8 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
CHIQ is cheaper
1-year return gap
8.6 pts
CHIQ is ahead
Larger fund
KWEB
$4.4B

Side by side

CHIQKWEB
FundGlobal X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETFKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
IssuerGlobal XKraneShares
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio0.65%0.70%
Assets$99M$4.4B
Average daily dollar volume$266K$397M
ListedNov 30, 2009Jul 31, 2013
FrenzyCap score3061
1-month return−3.5%−6.4%
3-month return−9.7%−9.6%
Year to date−25.7%−30.3%
1-year return−32.6%−41.2%
30-day volatility18.6%21.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−34.5%−42.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.80%8.83%
Holdings5434
Top 10 weight56.7%60.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$7.8M thru Jul 2026−$282M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility27.8%28.4%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

41% of CHIQ · 37% of KWEB
HoldingCHIQKWEB
PDD8.72%7.92%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD8.56%7.70%
MEITUAN-CLASS B8.79%6.83%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A6.54%3.87%
TRIP.COM GROUP LTD4.54%3.69%
TAL1.79%2.98%
VIPS1.61%2.46%
TONGCHENG TRAVEL HOLDINGS LTD0.92%1.41%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCHIQKWEBGap
Industrials8.7%7.9%+0.8%
Consumer Discretionary6.1%5.4%+0.6%
Technology0.0%10.0%−10.0%
Communication Services0.0%3.4%−3.4%
Financials0.0%1.0%−1.0%

More: full overlap table · CHIQ holdings · KWEB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.