FTWO vs MOO

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF against VanEck Agribusiness ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
8 shared positions
Fee gap
7 bp
FTWO is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.3 pts
FTWO is ahead
Larger fund
MOO
$1.1B

Side by side

FTWOMOO
FundStrive Natural Resources and Security ETFVanEck Agribusiness ETF
IssuerStriveVanEck
CategoryNatural Resources & AgricultureNatural Resources & Agriculture
Expense ratio0.49%0.56%
Assets$76M$1.1B
Average daily dollar volume$267K$34M
ListedAug 30, 2023Aug 31, 2007
FrenzyCap score4364
1-month return−3.8%−7.3%
3-month return+6.1%−1.3%
Year to date+11.8%+10.5%
1-year return+12.2%+9.9%
30-day volatility15.6%15.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−14.7%−11.2%
Trailing 12-month yield0.92%2.23%
Holdings5251
Top 10 weight54.9%56.3%
Look-through P/E27.0—
Holdings vs fair value+4.5%+13.5%
Holdings above 200-day average50%42%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$3.9M thru Jun 2026−$112M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—19.4%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

21% of FTWO · 28% of MOO
HoldingFTWOMOO
DE11.25%8.35%
NTR2.14%6.09%
CTVA4.01%1.23%
CF1.16%4.01%
TTC0.67%2.45%
DAR0.62%2.85%
AGCO0.50%1.74%
MOS0.48%1.70%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorFTWOMOOGap
Industrials34.7%15.3%+19.3%
Materials29.5%12.8%+16.7%
Consumer Staples5.1%25.2%−20.2%
Energy17.1%0.0%+17.1%
Utilities11.6%0.0%+11.6%
Health Care0.0%8.3%−8.3%
Financials0.6%0.0%+0.6%
Technology0.4%0.0%+0.4%

More: full overlap table · FTWO holdings · MOO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.