GSIB vs XLF

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF against State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight

21%

8 shared positions

Fee gap

27 bp

XLF is cheaper

1-year return gap

27.1 pts

GSIB is ahead

Larger fund

XLF

$50.4B

Side by side

	GSIB	XLF
Fund	Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Issuer	Themes	State Street SPDR
Category	Financials	Financials
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.08%
Assets	$41M	$50.4B
Average daily dollar volume	$724K	$2.0B
Listed	Dec 14, 2023	Dec 16, 1998
FrenzyCap score	45	88
1-month return	−7.2%	−3.8%
3-month return	−1.3%	−2.4%
Year to date	+15.8%	−0.1%
1-year return	+29.4%	+2.3%
30-day volatility	16.6%	12.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year	−13.9%	−15.2%
Trailing 12-month yield	1.65%	1.51%
Holdings	28	79
Top 10 weight	36.2%	57.4%
Look-through P/E	—	15.4
Holdings vs fair value	—	+2.5%
Holdings above 200-day average	71%	63%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months	−$4.2M thru Jun 2026	−$491M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility	—	17.3%
Holdings as of	as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing	as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

28% of GSIB · 30% of XLF

Holding	GSIB	XLF
BAC	3.53%	4.56%
JPM	3.51%	11.52%
GS	3.37%	3.36%
WFC	3.51%	3.25%
MS	3.40%	2.93%
C	3.47%	2.81%
BNY	3.59%	1.27%
STT	3.60%	0.63%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

Sector	GSIB	XLF	Gap
Financials	60.5%	79.8%	−19.3%
Industrials	0.0%	19.2%	−19.2%
Technology	0.0%	0.8%	−0.8%

More: full overlap table · GSIB holdings · XLF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.