MEDX vs OZEM

Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF against Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
23%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
26 bp
OZEM is cheaper
1-year return gap
10.2 pts
MEDX is ahead
Larger fund
OZEM
$55M

Side by side

MEDXOZEM
FundHorizon Kinetics Medical ETFRoundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
IssuerHorizon KineticsRoundhill
CategoryHealth CareBiotech & Health Innovation
Expense ratio0.85%0.59%
Assets$17M$55M
Average daily dollar volume$39K$493K
ListedSep 30, 1999May 20, 2024
FrenzyCap score933
1-month return+0.7%−5.9%
3-month return−0.6%−9.6%
Year to date+6.3%−13.3%
1-year return+11.6%+1.4%
30-day volatility16.6%20.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−10.5%−20.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.16%1.39%
Holdings3326
Top 10 weight67.1%65.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+3.8%+3.2%
Holdings above 200-day average67%54%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$862K thru Jun 2026+$286K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility—36.5%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

30% of MEDX · 27% of OZEM
HoldingMEDXOZEM
LLY18.46%12.69%
AMGN3.91%3.85%
AstraZeneca PLC4.99%3.83%
PFE2.86%6.38%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorMEDXOZEMGap
Health Care78.0%57.2%+20.8%
Consumer Staples0.6%0.0%+0.6%
Technology0.1%0.0%+0.1%

More: full overlap table · MEDX holdings · OZEM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.