NLR vs SMRZ
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF against Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
18%
6 shared positions
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
NLR
$3.2B
Side by side
| NLR | SMRZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF |
| Issuer | VanEck | Global X |
| Category | Nuclear & Uranium | Small Cap Blend |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | — |
| Assets | $3.2B | — |
| Average daily dollar volume | $44M | $181K |
| Listed | Aug 13, 2007 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 67 | 11 |
| 1-month return | −14.7% | — |
| 3-month return | −10.2% | — |
| Year to date | −24.0% | — |
| 1-year return | −42.1% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 39.4% | — |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −42.6% | −5.2% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.36% | — |
| Holdings | 27 | 13 |
| Top 10 weight | 65.7% | 97.8% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | +6.1% | +18.4% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 0% | 0% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$256M thru Jun 2026 | — |
| 30-day implied volatility | 38.0% | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 15, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 16, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
23% of NLR · 72% of SMRZ
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | NLR | SMRZ | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 13.7% | 56.1% | −42.4% |
| Utilities | 23.8% | 35.7% | −11.9% |
| Materials | 30.6% | 4.7% | +25.9% |
More: full overlap table · NLR holdings · SMRZ holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.