Nano Nuclear Energy Inc. Common Stock(NNE)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $15.44 – $60.87
- YTD
- -38.86%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 57.93
- Straddle Price
- $3.88
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.03
- Market Cap
- $0.9B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.60% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.10% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.97% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +33.7pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -5.3% |
| Book / Price | 77.2% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $23.18 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $19.02 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 204.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.2B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 19.4× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 13.1× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $29.80 | 14% | median 2.2× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 3.1× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $23.18 | 50% | stability 70% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $28.18 | 36% | 39 strikes · skew +0.27 |
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRIC SERVICES (4911)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.9B
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc is a nuclear energy and technology company developing smaller, simpler, and safer clean energy solutions using proprietary reactor designs, intellectual property, and research methods, and is currently in the pre-revenue stage. The Company development focuses on four business lines: the Nuclear Reactor Business, involving nuclear microreactors including KRONOS MMR, ZEUS, and LOKI MMR; the Fuel Processing Business, aimed at developing a domestic LEU and HALEU fuel supply chain in coordination with the Department of Energy; the Fuel Transportation Business, focused on dev…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +46.81% | 2 |
| Feb | -19.77% | 2 |
| Mar | -16.89% | 2 |
| Apr | -0.26% | 2 |
| May | +31.83% | 3 |
| Jun | +89.02% | 3 |
| Jul | -17.66% | 3 |
| Aug | +2.45% | 2 |
| Sep | +58.32% | 2 |
| Oct | +16.06% | 2 |
| Nov | +0.17% | 2 |
| Dec | -17.99% | 2 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
- IV Rank (30D)
- 57.93
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 122.4%
- Straddle (30D)
- $3.88
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.00
- P/C Volume
- 1.03
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 3.88
- Correlation (SPY)
- 50.4%
- R²
- 0.25
- Ann. Volatility
- 98.0%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $20.00M | 26.71% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $14.22M | 18.98% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $9.52M | 12.71% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $9.35M | 12.48% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $8.94M | 11.93% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $3.07M | 4.10% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $2.77M | 3.69% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $2.74M | 3.66% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | PEAK6 LLC | $2.06M | 2.76% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.88M | 2.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $214.02K | 0.29% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $145.41K | 0.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $24.66M | 30.72% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $10.72M | 13.35% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $10.04M | 12.50% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $9.46M | 11.79% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $7.52M | 9.37% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $6.85M | 8.53% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $3.25M | 4.05% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.70M | 2.12% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | HEIGHTS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC | $1.66M | 2.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.39M | 1.74% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Crawford Fund Management, LLC | $1.29M | 1.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Daiwa Securities Group Inc. | $711.40K | 0.89% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA /FI/ Custodian | $520.19K | 0.65% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $389.12K | 0.48% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Tidal Investments LLC | $122.88K | 0.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | Tsun Yee Law | Director | Exer (M) | +3,428 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-05 | Kenny Joe Yung Yu | Director | Exer (M) | +3,428 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-05 | Seth Jason Berl | Director | Mixed | −11,250 | $24.92 | -$93.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | Florent Heidet | Chief Technology Officer | Mixed | +6,185 | $24.95 | -$74.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | Diane Elizabeth Hare | Director | Mixed | — | $26.64 | -$91.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | Jiang Yu | President and Chairman | Mixed | −500,000 | $21.67 | -$19.30M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | I Financial Ventures Group LLC | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | −500,000 | $21.42 | -$18.07M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | James John Walker | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −25,000 | $18.00 | -$3.07M | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | Jaisun Garcha | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | — | $18.28 | -$925.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | Seth Jason Berl | Director | Sell (S) | −3,664 | $27.69 | -$101.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-04 | James John Walker | Chief Executive Officer | Exer (M) | +330,000 | $1.50 | $495.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-04 | Jaisun Garcha | Chief Financial Officer | Exer (M) | +95,000 | $1.82 | $172.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-30 | I Financial Ventures Group LLC | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | −388,000 | $22.18 | -$29.28M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-30 | James John Walker | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −25,000 | $18.88 | -$6.38M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-30 | Jiang Yu | President and Chairman | Mixed | −388,000 | $22.18 | -$29.28M | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I Financial Ventures Group LLC | 10%+ Owner | 17,536,000 | $296.01M | -$74.37M | 3 | 2026-06-05 |
| 2 | Jiang Yu | President and Chairman | 16,648,000 | $281.02M | -$75.59M | 6 | 2026-06-05 |
| 3 | James John Walker | Chief Executive Officer | 650,000 | $10.97M | -$10.67M | 7 | 2026-06-05 |
| 4 | Jaisun Garcha | Chief Financial Officer | 345,231 | $5.83M | -$3.54M | 6 | 2026-06-05 |
| 5 | Tsun Yee Law | Director | 78,428 | $1.32M | -$1.78M | 5 | 2026-06-05 |
| 6 | Kenny Joe Yung Yu | Director | 18,428 | $311.1K | -$1.30M | 5 | 2026-06-05 |
| 7 | Seth Jason Berl | Director | 7,586 | $128.1K | -$194.9K | 5 | 2026-06-05 |
| 8 | Florent Heidet | Chief Technology Officer | 6,185 | $104.4K | -$74.9K | 4 | 2026-06-05 |
| 9 | Diane Elizabeth Hare | Director | 100 | $1.7K | -$1.31M | 6 | 2026-06-05 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | FLORENT HEIDET | Officer | 3,000 | $74.9K | 2026-06-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | SETH BERL | Director | 3,750 | $93.5K | 2026-06-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Walker James John | Officer | 123,688 | $3.70M | 2026-06-03 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | Garcha Jaisun | Officer, CFO | 37,215 | $1.11M | 2026-06-03 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | JIANG YU | Director, Officer, 10% Stockholder | 45,900 | $1.40M | 2026-06-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | I FINANCIAL VENTURES GROUP LLC | 10% Stockholder | 700,000 | $21.40M | 2026-06-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | DIANE HARE | Director | 3,428 | $104.8K | 2026-06-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | SETH BERL | Director | 3,664 | $101.4K | 2026-03-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-28 | Walker James John | Officer | 195,000 | $6.87M | 2026-01-28 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-28 | Garcha Jaisun | Officer | 75,000 | $2.64M | 2026-01-28 | UBS Financial Services, Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 1.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | -15.8 |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $-0.69 |
| ROE | -5.3% |