NUKX vs SMRZ

Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF against Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
20%
5 shared positions
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
NUKX
$7.8M

Side by side

NUKXSMRZ
FundNicholas Nuclear Income ETFGlobal X Small Modular Reactor ETF
IssuerNicholasGlobal X
CategoryMultisector BondSmall Cap Blend
Expense ratio1.07%—
Assets$7.8M—
Average daily dollar volume$121K$181K
ListedMar 2, 2026Oct 15, 2026
FrenzyCap score911
1-month return−13.6%—
3-month return−15.3%—
Year to date——
1-year return——
30-day volatility41.3%—
Worst drawdown, 1 year−42.1%−5.2%
Trailing 12-month yield11.21%—
Holdings5913
Top 10 weight61.4%97.8%
Look-through P/E475.1—
Holdings vs fair value+10.8%+18.4%
Holdings above 200-day average0%0%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$7.4M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 16, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

23% of NUKX · 58% of SMRZ
HoldingNUKXSMRZ
GEV6.73%7.15%
SMR3.87%19.73%
OKLO3.68%15.45%
NNE3.49%13.88%
LEU5.19%1.99%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorNUKXSMRZGap
Utilities36.5%35.7%+0.8%
Industrials10.6%56.1%−45.5%
Materials24.2%4.7%+19.5%

More: full overlap table · NUKX holdings · SMRZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.