NUKZ vs SMRZ

Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF against Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
8 shared positions
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
NUKZ
$890M

Side by side

NUKZSMRZ
FundRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETFGlobal X Small Modular Reactor ETF
IssuerRangeGlobal X
CategoryNuclear & UraniumSmall Cap Blend
Expense ratio0.85%—
Assets$890M—
Average daily dollar volume$6.5M$181K
ListedJan 10, 2024Oct 15, 2026
FrenzyCap score4411
1-month return−8.3%—
3-month return−6.8%—
Year to date−8.5%—
1-year return−20.1%—
30-day volatility25.8%—
Worst drawdown, 1 year−23.8%−5.2%
Trailing 12-month yield0.99%—
Holdings4613
Top 10 weight36.2%97.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+13.6%+18.4%
Holdings above 200-day average12%0%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$27M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility31.0%—
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 16, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

15% of NUKZ · 73% of SMRZ
HoldingNUKZSMRZ
GEV3.32%7.15%
OKLO2.31%15.45%
IMSR2.23%8.43%
NNE1.98%13.88%
BWXT1.83%3.44%
SMR1.75%19.73%
LEU1.26%1.99%
KEPCO Engineering & Construction Company, Inc0.75%3.28%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorNUKZSMRZGap
Industrials23.5%56.1%−32.6%
Utilities20.8%35.7%−14.9%
Materials17.9%4.7%+13.2%
Technology0.9%0.0%+0.9%

More: full overlap table · NUKZ holdings · SMRZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.