SMRF vs SMRZ

ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF against Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
19%
7 shared positions
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
SMRF
$11M

Side by side

SMRFSMRZ
FundALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETFGlobal X Small Modular Reactor ETF
IssuerALPSGlobal X
CategoryNuclear & UraniumSmall Cap Blend
Expense ratio0.65%—
Assets$11M—
Average daily dollar volume$165K$181K
ListedFeb 18, 2026Oct 15, 2026
FrenzyCap score2611
1-month return−15.0%—
3-month return−13.0%—
Year to date——
1-year return——
30-day volatility35.3%—
Worst drawdown, 1 year−32.3%−5.2%
Trailing 12-month yield1.41%—
Holdings8713
Top 10 weight40.4%97.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+15.8%+18.4%
Holdings above 200-day average19%0%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$4.6M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 16, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

21% of SMRF · 70% of SMRZ
HoldingSMRFSMRZ
OKLO4.24%15.45%
GEV3.84%7.15%
SMR3.78%19.73%
BWXT4.25%3.44%
LEU3.18%1.99%
NNE1.17%13.88%
IMSR0.57%8.43%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorSMRFSMRZGap
Industrials12.4%56.1%−43.7%
Utilities12.4%35.7%−23.3%
Materials24.3%4.7%+19.6%
Technology26.4%0.0%+26.4%
Financials0.4%0.0%+0.4%

More: full overlap table · SMRF holdings · SMRZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.