URA vs URNM

Global X Uranium ETF against Sprott Uranium Miners ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
6.5 pts
URNM is ahead
Larger fund
URA
$4.9B

Side by side

URAURNM
FundGlobal X Uranium ETFSprott Uranium Miners ETF
IssuerGlobal XSprott
CategoryNuclear & UraniumNuclear & Uranium
Expense ratio0.69%—
Assets$4.9B—
Average daily dollar volume$146M$32M
ListedNov 4, 2010Dec 3, 2019
FrenzyCap score59—
1-month return−18.1%−16.9%
3-month return−14.1%−15.4%
Year to date−17.7%−21.3%
1-year return−34.0%−27.5%
30-day volatility37.2%40.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−43.1%−49.5%
Trailing 12-month yield5.92%4.04%
Holdings64—
Top 10 weight62.1%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$206M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility43.5%43.6%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · URA holdings · URNM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.