ARMY Tema ETF Trust Tema International Defense ETF
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Tema ETF Trust Tema International Defense ETF (ARMY) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2025-09-24
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.68% prospectus, filed Jun 29, 2026
- Assets
- $4.8M SEC filing, May 31, 2026
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $144K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 34 top 10 are 47.1%
- Listed
- Sep 24, 2025 Nasdaq
- Last fee change
- -7 bp filed Oct 9, 2025
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (19% of its variance, beta 1.00); Developed markets ex-US over US (15% of its variance, beta 1.13); Gold (7% of its variance, beta 0.19); Small caps over large (5% of its variance, beta 0.48). These factors explain 41% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. Tema International Defense ETF (the Fund) seeks to provide long-term growth. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 34 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Aerospace & Defense ETFs
- May 2026
- +$2.0M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$3.6M +73.9% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- —
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | +$2.0M |
| Apr 2026 | $0 |
| Mar 2026 | +$1.6M |
| Feb 2026 | $0 |
| Jan 2026 | $0 |
| Dec 2025 | $0 |
| Nov 2025 | −$3.5M |
| Oct 2025 | $0 |
| Sep 2025 | +$5.1M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 9 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDEFWisdomTree Europe Defense Fund | 57% | 0.45% | $88M | −19.2% | compare |
| XDEFXtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 57% | 0.35% | $4.6M | — | compare |
| WDGFWisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 40% | 0.45% | $5.3M | −10.7% | compare |
| NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF | 30% | 0.35% | $90M | −8.9% | compare |
| ARKXARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF | 18% | 0.75% | $744M | +0.9% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Insider buying
- 0% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 17% net selling
- Reporting earnings
- 0.0% of weight in 7 days; 5.2% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease | Rheinmetall AG | 4.11% | 2.90% | −10.1% |
| New position | Kongsberg Maritime AS | — | 0.90% | — |
1 new, 0 exited, 0 increased and 1 decreased between the fund's two latest holdings reports; turnover 8.5%. Full holdings and history
- Authorized participants
- 2 active of 2 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $5.6M · $3.8M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 99% creations 98% in kind
- Creation unit
- 10,000 shares
- Securities lending
- authorized, none lent
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKLB | Rocket Lab Corp | 7.16% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Elbit Systems Ltd | 6.07% | Equity (common) | IL |
| — | Kongsberg Gruppen ASA | 5.14% | Equity (common) | NO |
| — | Hensoldt AG | 4.37% | Equity (common) | DE |
| — | BAE Systems PLC | 4.27% | Equity (common) | GB |
| — | Indra Sistemas SA | 4.07% | Equity (common) | ES |
| — | Saab AB | 4.04% | Equity (common) | SE |
| — | Chemring Group PLC | 4.02% | Equity (common) | GB |
| — | Dassault Aviation SA | 3.98% | Equity (common) | FR |
| — | Leonardo SpA | 3.94% | Equity (common) | IT |
| — | QinetiQ Group PLC | 3.94% | Equity (common) | GB |
| — | Thales SA | 3.65% | Equity (common) | FR |
| — | RENK Group AG | 3.63% | Equity (common) | DE |
| — | Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 3.44% | Equity (common) | GB |
| — | Airbus SE | 3.27% | Equity (common) | NL |
| — | Babcock International Group PL | 3.21% | Equity (common) | GB |
| — | Rheinmetall AG | 2.90% | Equity (common) | DE |
| — | Safran SA | 2.65% | Equity (common) | FR |
| — | MTU Aero Engines AG | 2.59% | Equity (common) | DE |
| — | Tkms AG& Co KGaA | 2.46% | Equity (common) | DE |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc | 2.21% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | CSG NV | 2.19% | Equity (common) | CZ |
| — | First American Treasury Obliga | 2.18% | Short-term investment | US |
| AVAV | AeroVironment Inc | 2.08% | Equity (common) | US |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin Corp | 1.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| LHX | L3Harris Technologies Inc | 1.43% | Equity (common) | US |
| DRS | Leonardo DRS Inc | 1.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| RTX | RTX Corp | 1.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Avon Technologies PLC | 1.26% | Equity (common) | GB |
| — | Avio SpA | 1.25% | Equity (common) | IT |
| GD | General Dynamics Corp | 1.16% | Equity (common) | US |
| BA | Boeing Co/The | 1.12% | Equity (common) | US |
| NOC | Northrop Grumman Corp | 1.05% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Kongsberg Maritime AS | 0.90% | Equity (common) | NO |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term investment | 2.18% | $105363 | 1 |
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Apr | -5.07% | -5.07% |
| May | 7.82% | 7.82% |
| Jun | -8.41% | -8.41% |
| Jul | 4.54% | 4.54% |
| Aug | -2.33% | -2.33% |
| Sep | -6.16% | -6.16% |
| Oct | -1.33%* | -1.33% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -11.37% | -11.37% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary: Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10) Key Drivers: Technical consolidation, mixed sentiment signals Primary Risks: Volatility regime, earnings uncertainty Investment Thesis: Army's recent price action is influenced by short-term trends, while medium-term indicators suggest a range-bound market. Recent News Sentiment Impact: No significant news headlines available.
Technical Analysis:
- Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidation; Medium-term (1-3 months): Range-bound
- Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels: $22.24, $23.88, $25.53 (Bollinger Bands)
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (52.20)
- MACD signal: Bearish (MACD -0.21 / Signal 0.03 / Histogram -0.24)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (squeeze)
News & Sentiment Analysis:
- Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available.
- Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (no significant sentiment signals)
- Catalyst Identification: No imminent catalysts identified.
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
- Beta Interpretation: Moderate risk relative to market (beta 1.02)
- Volatility Regime: Above average volatility regime
- Options Market Signals: IV premium positive, indicating richer implied volatilities than realized
- Downside Protection: Support levels at $22.24 and $23.88
Market Context & Positioning:
- Sector Performance: Neutral (relative strength index 0)
- Institutional Activity: Mixed signals (volume SMA 20: 2550.95, OBV: -16038.59)
- Correlation Analysis: Moderate correlation with market (R-squared 0.41)
- Relative Valuation: Army's price action is relatively neutral within the trading range
Key Levels & Action Items:
- Critical Price Levels: Support at $22.24 and $23.88, resistance at $25.53
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Short-term breakout above $25.53 or breakdown below $22.24 could trigger significant moves
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No imminent earnings dates or product launches identified.
- Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at $23.88 and position sizing considerations.
Conclusion: Army's recent price action is characterized by a consolidation phase, with mixed sentiment signals from technical indicators. The lack of significant news headlines and neutral market context contribute to the overall neutral assessment. Investors should be cautious due to the above-average volatility regime and potential risks from earnings uncertainty.
ARMY Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 133
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
ARMY Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $12.40M | 65.94% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $6.41M | 34.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $5.24M | 52.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $4.69M | 47.23% | 2026-06-30 |
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKLB | Rocket Lab Corp | 7.16% | $68.21 | -0.28% | -7.72% | +8.36% |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc | 2.21% | $209.05 | +5.17% | +10.75% | +25.01% |
| AVAV | AeroVironment Inc | 2.08% | $137.11 | -0.36% | -2.63% | -6.54% |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin Corp | 1.58% | $509.59 | +0.33% | +0.83% | -2.79% |
| LHX | L3Harris Technologies Inc | 1.43% | $236.97 | +0.02% | +0.16% | -3.49% |
| DRS | Leonardo DRS Inc | 1.34% | $36.24 | +1.03% | -1.52% | +0.47% |
| RTX | RTX Corp | 1.34% | $185.97 | +0.90% | +0.70% | -5.92% |
| GD | General Dynamics Corp | 1.16% | $331.27 | +0.42% | +0.36% | -6.92% |
| BA | Boeing Co/The | 1.12% | $190.37 | +1.40% | -1.65% | -9.54% |
| NOC | Northrop Grumman Corp | 1.05% | $480.72 | -0.78% | +0.57% | -7.37% |