BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April
ETFETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2025-04-03
- Has Options
- No
- Expense ratio
- 0.90% prospectus, filed Apr 30, 2026
- Assets
- $2.1M SEC filing, Jun 30, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 21.35% paid annual
- Average daily volume
- $15K 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 17 top 10 are 1314.1%
- Listed
- Apr 3, 2025 NYSE Arca
Moves with. Bitcoin (59% of its variance, beta 0.46); Gold (4% of its variance, beta 0.11). These factors explain 61% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The investment objective of the FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF April (the Fund ) is to seek to provide investors with returns (before fees and expenses) that match the price return of a reference asset which seeks to reflect generally (before fees and expenses) the performance of the price of bitcoin (the Bitcoin Reference Instrument ), up to a predetermined upside cap of 26.79% (before fees and expenses) while providing a maximum loss of 15% (before fees and expenses) of Bitcoin Reference Instrument losses, over the period from April 1, 2026 through April 9, 2027. (from the fund's prospectus)
- Jun 2026
- +$696K latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$696K +33.7% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$28M −1344.7% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jun 2026 | +$696K |
| May 2026 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | $0 |
| Mar 2026 | $0 |
| Feb 2026 | $0 |
| Jan 2026 | $0 |
| Dec 2025 | $0 |
| Nov 2025 | $0 |
| Oct 2025 | $0 |
| Sep 2025 | −$1.2M |
| Aug 2025 | $0 |
| Jul 2025 | −$27M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 15 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBITiShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | — | — | $65.9B | −33.6% | compare |
| FBTCFidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | — | — | $15.3B | −33.5% | compare |
| GBTCGrayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | — | — | $12.3B | −34.4% | compare |
| BTCGrayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | — | — | $4.4B | −33.5% | compare |
| ARKBARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | — | — | $3.1B | −33.5% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Bitcoin category.
- Authorized participants
- 3 active of 26 with agreements; top 3 did 100%
- Created · redeemed
- $43M · $42M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 0% creations 0% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- authorized, none lent
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-29 | 2025-12-31 | $3.4433 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | 1290.60% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | 20.87% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | 15.85% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | Dreyfus Government Cash Management Funds | 1.27% | Short-term investment | US |
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | 0.07% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | -0.01% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | -16.30% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | -31.60% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| — | CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. | -1181.67% | Derivative (equity) | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Derivative (equity) | 98.30% | $2.0M | 16 |
| Short-term investment | 1.76% | $36309 | 1 |
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -4.95% | -4.95% |
| Feb | -- | -10.81% | -10.81% |
| Mar | -- | -4.87% | -4.87% |
| Apr | 7.45% | 5.37% | 6.41% |
| May | 4.37% | -1.82% | 1.27% |
| Jun | 3.10% | -7.58% | -2.24% |
| Jul | 4.48% | 0.67% | 2.58% |
| Aug | 0.25% | 9.56% | 4.91% |
| Sep | 1.19% | 4.33% | 2.76% |
| Oct | -1.68% | -0.71%* | -1.19% |
| Nov | -7.50% | -- | -7.50% |
| Dec | -14.28% | -- | -14.28% |
| Total | -4.47% | -11.90% | -8.18% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
BFAP Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
BFAP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|