GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·29d ago
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
ETF 28.00 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
ARKB
$28.00
—
Key stats
$28.00
Pre-market
$27.17
-2.97%
- 52-Week Range
- $19.24 – $38.58
- YTD
- -6.01%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 42.39
- Straddle Price
- $2.35
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.82
- Open
- $27.72
- Day Range
- $27.58 – $28.14
- Volume
- 1,511,005
- Prev Close
- $27.35
About
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- BATS
- Inception
- 2024-01-10
- Has Options
- Yes
Fund profile
through Sep 2026flows, SEC filings
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- —
- Trailing yield
- —
- Average daily volume
- $45M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Jan 10, 2024 Cboe BZX
Moves with. Bitcoin (100% of its variance, beta 1.00). These factors explain 100% of its daily moves over the last year.
Fund flows
through Sep 2026SEC filings- Sep 2026
- +$196M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$196M
- Latest 12 months
- —
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Oct 2026 | −$122M |
| Sep 2026 | +$196M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 2 months ago
Similar funds
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBITiShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | — | 0.25% | $66.9B | −22.8% | compare |
| FBTCFidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | — | 0.25% | $14.4B | −22.8% | compare |
| BITOProShares Bitcoin ETF | — | — | $1.7B | −37.2% | compare |
| EZBCFranklin Bitcoin ETF | — | 0.19% | $467M | −22.7% | compare |
| RSSXReturn Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF | — | 0.67% | $61M | +1.2% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Bitcoin category.
ETF Profile
Holdings
—
AUM
—
Provider
ARK Invest
Inception
2024-01-10
Exchange
BATS
Data As Of
—
Expense Ratio
—
Dividend Yield
—
Distribution
—
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -9.00% | 4.17% | -6.68% | -3.84% |
| Feb | 44.64% | -16.83% | -15.81% | 4.00% |
| Mar | 12.35% | -4.24% | -2.05% | 2.02% |
| Apr | -15.33% | 10.73% | 12.07% | 2.49% |
| May | 18.78% | 8.29% | -6.42% | 6.88% |
| Jun | -13.40% | 2.99% | -17.92% | -9.44% |
| Jul | 3.17% | 10.74% | 4.51% | 6.14% |
| Aug | -7.23% | -4.34% | 23.62% | 4.02% |
| Sep | 9.53% | 3.23% | 8.04% | 6.93% |
| Oct | 13.24% | -6.58% | -0.18%* | 2.16% |
| Nov | 40.37% | -14.83% | -- | 12.77% |
| Dec | -2.48% | 2.29% | -- | -0.09% |
| Total | 109.29% | -8.81% | -7.70% | 30.93% |
* Only 3 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $27.63
SMA 50: $26.19
SMA 200: $24.43
Current: $28.00
EMA 12: $27.45
EMA 26: $27.14
MACD: 0.3079 | Signal: -0.1317
BULLISH
ADX (14): 21.17
WEAK TREND
+DI: 27.74
−DI: 23.02
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 59.81
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 43.15
Stoch %D: 33.83
Williams %R: -36.29
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $28.45
BB Lower: $26.80
NEUTRAL
OBV: -115,772,969
Vol SMA 20: 1,323,300
Vol ROC: -36.64%
ATR: $0.69
True Range: $0.79
HV 20: 19.7%
HV 30: 33.3%
HV 60: 36.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) - Comprehensive Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with 6/10 Confidence
ARKB presents a conflicted technical and sentiment picture within a high-volatility, actively managed Bitcoin ETF framework. The fund benefits from strong recent inflows (+$196M in September 2026, +6.2% of assets over 3 months) and positive crypto sentiment headlines, but technical momentum shows emerging weakness despite bullish MACD signals. The high beta (1.77) and elevated volatility (36-37% HV) create significant directional risk, while the put/call volume ratio (2.66) signals defensive positioning by options traders ahead of potential consolidation.
Investment Thesis: ARKB is capturing strong institutional and retail interest in Bitcoin exposure through an actively managed vehicle, but the fund faces a technical inflection point where overbought conditions (RSI neutral at 51, but Stochastic %K at 32.89 suggesting recent pullback), negative fund flows in volume metrics (-34.82% volume ROC), and bearish options positioning could precede a consolidation phase. The asymmetric put/call volume ratio indicates options traders expect downside volatility over the next 1-4 weeks.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: News flow is moderately POSITIVE overall (4 positive, 1 negative, 1 neutral since June 2026), focusing on Bitcoin ETF inflows and crypto market revival. However, the June 2026 SpaceX IPO headline suggests potential capital rotation away from crypto, which may explain the recent volume decline and put accumulation despite positive news.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Confidence | Interpretation | |---|---|---|---| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | CONSOLIDATION → Potential Breakdown | Medium | Price trading between SMA20 ($27.67) and SMA50 ($25.59), recent close at $27.09 suggests weakening momentum | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | UPTREND (intact but losing steam) | Medium-High | Price above all major MAs; however, negative volume ROC and put accumulation suggest traders hedging upside | | Long-term (3-12 months) | UPTREND | High | Price $27.09 well above SMA200 ($24.49; +10.6%); strong fund inflows support structural bid |
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Distance | Significance | |---|---|---|---| | $29.09 | Resistance (Bollinger Upper Band) | +$1.99 (+7.3%) | Immediate overhead; short-term overbought zone | | $27.67 | Dynamic Support (SMA 20) | -$0.58 (-2.1%) | Near-term technical floor; 20-day trend anchor | | $26.24 | Support (Bollinger Lower Band) | -$0.85 (-3.1%) | Mean-reversion target if consolidation fails | | $25.59 | Strong Support (SMA 50) | -$1.50 (-5.5%) | Medium-term support; major moving average | | $24.49 | Strong Support (SMA 200) | -$2.60 (-9.6%) | Long-term trend line; major technical floor |
Momentum Signals
MACD (Bullish):
- MACD Line: 0.47 | Signal Line: -0.23 | Histogram: +0.69 (BULLISH DIVERGENCE)
- Interpretation: MACD above signal line with positive histogram indicates bullish momentum initiation, but the negative signal line suggests momentum may be building from a recent low. This is a future-looking bullish signal, not confirmation of current strength.
- Signal Quality: MODERATE — Histogram positive but signal line still underwater suggests early-stage recovery, not sustained momentum.
RSI (14): 51.10 (NEUTRAL)
- Interpretation: Squarely in neutral zone (30-70), indicating neither overbought nor oversold conditions. Recent Stochastic %K at 32.89 and %D at 32.36 suggest oscillators just turned upward from oversold territory, consistent with early-stage recovery.
- Signal Quality: MODERATE — RSI neutrality suggests price consolidation phase; no compelling directional conviction from momentum yet.
Williams %R: -79.39 (OVERSOLD)
- Interpretation: Deeply oversold, indicating potential mean-reversion bounce. This contradicts the neutral RSI and suggests intraday volatility rather than directional exhaustion.
- Signal Quality: LOW — Williams %R may be exaggerated on lower timeframes; conflicting with RSI suggests mixed momentum.
Bollinger Bands (NEUTRAL):
- Width: 10.30% (mid-range volatility, neither squeeze nor extreme expansion)
- Position: Price $27.09 trading between middle band ($27.67) and lower band ($26.24)
- Signal: Neither mean-reversion pressure nor breakout conditions present; band width suggests consolidation environment.
Volume Analysis
Critical Volume Weakness Detected:
- Volume SMA 20: 1,390,813 shares (baseline)
- Volume Rate of Change: -34.82% (SIGNIFICANT DECLINE)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): -127.2M (deeply negative; cumulative selling pressure)
Interpretation: Despite positive news and fund inflows (flows are assets not volume), the sharp 34.82% decline in trading volume combined with deeply negative OBV indicates:
- Institutional inflows are NOT translating to aggressive buying volume — flows likely reflect passive/automated purchases into the fund
- Net selling pressure from active traders — negative OBV suggests cumulative distribution
- Potential late-stage rally fatigue — strong uptrends supported by volume; this rally lacks conviction
Institutional Interest Signal: CAUTIONARY — Fund inflows (+6.2% YTD) are significant, but volume patterns suggest passive index/allocation flows, not active accumulation at higher prices. This is typical of successful ETFs attracting capital, but volume weakness often precedes consolidation or pullback.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
| Date | Source | Theme | Sentiment | Relevance to ARKB | |---|---|---|---|---| | 2026-09-23 | GlobeNewswire | Bitcoin ETF inflows ($998.95M) + crypto presale hype | POSITIVE | Direct catalyst for fund inflows; validates Bitcoin ETF demand | | 2026-09-11 | Motley Fool | Cathie Wood crypto forecast (+1,490% potential) | NEUTRAL | Supportive of ARK's crypto thesis, but generic prediction | | 2026-08-27 | Zacks | Bitcoin ETF revival post-downturn | POSITIVE | Macroeconomic tailwind for Bitcoin demand | | 2026-06-10 | Benzinga | SpaceX IPO potential capital rotation away from crypto | NEGATIVE | This headline aligns with volume decline and put accumulation | | 2025-09-06 | Motley Fool | Retail crypto investment guidance | POSITIVE | Broad-market retail interest; supports long-term demand | | 2025-07-12 | Motley Fool | 5-year Bitcoin ETF outlook | POSITIVE | Institutional confidence in Bitcoin ETF category |
Sentiment Assessment
Aggregate Sentiment: MODERATELY POSITIVE (4 positive, 1 negative, 1 neutral)
However, news sentiment diverges sharply from recent price action and volume data:
- Positive news flow (latest articles from Sept 2026) suggests Bitcoin ETF inflows should accelerate
- Actual volume metrics (down 34.82%) and put/call ratios (2.66 puts per call) indicate traders are bracing for consolidation despite positive headlines
- Catalyst mismatch: The most recent positive news (Bitcoin ETF inflows, Sept 2026) should be driving volume, but instead volume has collapsed
Interpretation: Market may be price-discounting the Bitcoin narrative already (fund already up 10.6% since 200-day MA), and retail/retail-focused headlines ("$100 investment," "Smartest way to invest") suggest retail euphoria. Historically, retail-focused positive news coupled with declining volume can precede localized pullbacks
Generated
News
All ARKB news →
The Motley FoolT3·1mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·1mo ago
BenzingaT3·4mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·13mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·15mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·16mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·18mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·18mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·18mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
ARKB Options Activity & IV Rank
ARKB IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 36.8%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $2.35
7-DTE Move: $2.35
Days to Exp: 30 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 222
Put Volume: 181
P/C Volume: 0.815
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 478
Put OI: 218
P/C OI: 0.456
Total OI: 696
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $1.18
ATM Put: $1.18
Call %: 4.2%
Put %: 4.2%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 2,047
Chain OI: 11,618
Last Updated: 10/21/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 61st percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
61%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.82
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.61
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.74
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.61: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.74: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 34 ATM contracts, 4k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
58%
+9.6
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 21 · ATM 36.8% / Wing 46.4%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)42.4MediumOct 21
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$2.35Oct 21
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.7564
Alpha: -44.70%
Correlation: 0.4965
R-Squared: 24.7%
Stock Volatility: 44.9%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
ARKB Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
7 filers$9.43M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.41M | 25.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.94M | 20.52% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.85M | 19.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.29M | 13.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.07M | 11.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $844.56K | 8.95% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $23.35K | 0.25% | 2026-06-30 |
6 filers$3.15M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $984.68K | 31.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $957.43K | 30.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $360.01K | 11.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $326.97K | 10.38% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $268.55K | 8.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $251.03K | 7.97% | 2026-06-30 |
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
417.65K
SI % of Float
—
Days to Cover
1.00
Short Vol Ratio
77.2%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21
Constituent Performance
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
Constituents
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|