BHFAP Brighthouse Financial, Inc. Depositary Shares 6.6% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- LIFE INSURANCE (6311) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 1,400
- List Date
- 2019-03-18
- CIK
- 0001685040
- Headquarters
- Charlotte, NC
- Homepage
- https://www.brighthousefinancial.com
Brighthouse Financial Inc is a United States-based provider of annuity products and life insurance through independent distribution channels and marketing arrangements with distribution partners. Its segments are: Annuities, that derives majority of the revenue, includes variable, fixed, index-linked, and income annuities; The life segment includes variable, term, universal, and whole life policies; The Run-off segment consists of products that are no longer actively sold and are separately managed, including ULSG, structured settlements, pension risk transfer contracts, certain company-owned …
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.57% | -0.83% | 16.43% | 14.00% | -4.81% | 9.21% | 5.41% |
| Feb | -3.45% | 0.91% | -2.04% | -2.10% | 3.32% | 0.78% | -0.43% |
| Mar | 3.27% | -4.58% | -9.81% | -0.57% | -8.59% | -11.62% | -5.32% |
| Apr | -2.88% | -1.10% | 4.31% | -9.93% | 1.68% | 5.33% | -0.43% |
| May | 1.95% | 3.36% | -5.08% | 1.79% | 3.82% | -5.31% | 0.09% |
| Jun | 1.69% | -5.57% | -6.19% | 1.14% | -11.59% | -3.98% | -4.08% |
| Jul | -1.94% | 5.32% | 3.73% | -0.48% | -11.90% | -5.68% | -1.82% |
| Aug | -0.43% | -5.03% | 0.18% | 2.76% | 9.43% | 3.45% | 1.73% |
| Sep | -3.01% | -0.98% | 2.38% | 4.16% | -8.33% | -3.57% | -1.56% |
| Oct | 1.27% | -6.87% | -14.76% | -1.08% | -6.70% | -9.32%* | -6.24% |
| Nov | -3.62% | 11.93% | 6.08% | -3.83% | 6.52% | -- | 3.42% |
| Dec | -0.52% | -12.35% | -2.91% | -7.81% | -8.35% | -- | -6.39% |
| Total | -9.14% | -16.59% | -10.76% | -3.87% | -32.46% | -20.52% | -15.56% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical indicators suggest a neutral trend, with no clear buy or sell signals.
- Recent news headlines are mixed, with some negative sentiment but no significant market-moving events.
- Risk metrics indicate low volatility, which may reduce the potential for large price movements.
Investment Thesis: Brighthouse Financial (BHFAP) is a mid-cap financial company with a complex risk profile. While it has some attractive valuation metrics, its recent performance has been lackluster. A thorough analysis of technical and fundamental indicators suggests that BHFAP's stock may be consolidating before a potential move.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The sentiment analysis reveals a mix of neutral and negative news headlines, which is not significantly impacting the current market momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL
- Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
- Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $15.21 (support)
- EMA 26: $15.31 (resistance)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $15.60 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14) is neutral at 41.69.
- MACD signal line is bearish, with a histogram of -0.21.
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals suggest a defensive stance, with low volume and negative OBV.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Overlooked and Undervalued (neutral) 2-6. Regulatory issues, downgrades, and management changes (negative)
Sentiment Assessment: The overall sentiment is NEUTRAL, reflecting the mixed news headlines.
Catalyst Identification: No significant market-moving events are scheduled in the near term.
Market Narrative: The technical signals suggest a neutral trend, while the recent news headlines indicate some defensive tendencies.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta is 0.20, indicating low volatility relative to the broader market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility (HV30) is lower than historical levels (HV60).
Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.
Downside Protection: Support levels include SMA 20 and EMA 26.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Financials are performing relatively weakly compared to the broader market.
Institutional Activity: Low volume and negative OBV suggest institutional interest is defensive.
Correlation Analysis: BHFAP's correlation with the broader market (R-squared) is 0.08, indicating a low relationship.
Relative Valuation: The stock trades within its historical range, suggesting no significant value opportunities or risks.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $15.21
- EMA 26: $15.31
- Upper Bollinger Band: $15.60
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No significant market-moving events are scheduled in the near term.
Risk Management: Monitor the stock's price action and adjust position sizes accordingly, considering the low volatility and neutral trend.
By analyzing the technical indicators, news headlines, and risk metrics, this report provides a comprehensive overview of Brighthouse Financial's (BHFAP) current market situation. The overall assessment is NEUTRAL, with no clear buy or sell signals. The stock may be consolidating before a potential move, and investors should consider monitoring key price levels and adjusting position sizes accordingly to manage risk.
BHFAP Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
BHFAP Institutional Ownership (13F)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
BHFAP Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-04| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 | Diane E Offereins | Director | Exer (M) | +2,837 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-04 | Lizabeth H Zlatkus | Director | Exer (M) | +2,837 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-04 | C Edward Chaplin | Director | Exer (M) | +4,556 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-04 | Eileen A Mallesch | Director | Mixed | +2,651 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-04 | Michael J. Inserra | Director | Exer (M) | +1,418 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-04 | Stephen C Hooley | Director | Mixed | +2,651 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-04 | Carol Juel | Director | Mixed | +2,651 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-04 | Paul M. Wetzel | Director | Exer (M) | +2,837 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Carol Juel | Director | Exer (M) | +3,361 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Paul M. Wetzel | Director | Exer (M) | +4,823 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-09 | Melissa B. Pavlovich | Chief Accounting Officer | Mixed | +3,993 | $61.02 | -$96.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | John Rosenthal | EVP & Chief Investment Officer | Mixed | +12,784 | $59.98 | -$804.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Vonda Huss | EVP & Chief HR Officer | Mixed | +8,389 | $59.98 | -$395.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Myles Lambert | EVP, Chief Operating Officer | Mixed | +10,932 | $59.98 | -$686.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | Allie Lin | EVP & General Counsel | Mixed | +9,011 | $59.98 | -$422.0K | EDGAR |
BHFAP Insider Holdings
15 insiders · @ $12.45| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eric T Steigerwalt | President and CEO | 382,813 | $4.77M | -$7.02M | 17 | 2026-03-02 |
| 2 | John Rosenthal | EVP & Chief Investment Officer | 86,209 | $1.07M | -$1.80M | 17 | 2026-03-02 |
| 3 | Edward A. Spehar | EVP & Chief Financial Officer | 70,909 | $882.8K | -$1.17M | 16 | 2026-03-02 |
| 4 | Myles Lambert | EVP, Chief Operating Officer | 54,631 | $680.2K | -$2.55M | 18 | 2026-03-02 |
| 5 | C Edward Chaplin | Director | 54,454 | $678.0K | $170.2K | 12 | 2026-06-04 |
| 6 | Diane E Offereins | Director | 28,634 | $356.5K | $0 | 10 | 2026-06-04 |
| 7 | Vonda Huss | EVP & Chief HR Officer | 27,320 | $340.1K | -$1.25M | 13 | 2026-03-02 |
| 8 | Paul M. Wetzel | Director | 23,672 | $294.7K | $0 | 14 | 2026-06-04 |
| 9 | Allie Lin | EVP & General Counsel | 15,425 | $192.0K | $0 | 6 | 2026-03-02 |
| 10 | Melissa B. Pavlovich | Chief Accounting Officer | 14,232 | $177.2K | $0 | 2 | 2026-04-09 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.