COCHW Envoy Medical, Inc Warrant
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- ORTHOPEDIC, PROSTHETIC & SURGICAL APPLIANCES & SUPPLIES (3842) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 47
- List Date
- 2023-10-02
- CIK
- 0001840877
- Headquarters
- White Bear Lake, MN
- Homepage
- https://www.envoymedical.com
Envoy Medical Inc is a hearing health company focused on providing medical technologies across the hearing loss spectrum. Its product portfolio comprises: the Esteem FI-AMEI, a fully implanted active middle ear implant (FI -AMEI) that works with the ear's natural anatomy, and is FDA-approved for adults with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss; and Acclaim CI, an investigational cochlear implant under development. The company derives all of its revenue substantially from the sale of the Esteem FI-AMEI implants and their replacement components. It has one reportable segment: hearing.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -15.84% | -18.37% | -6.60% | -13.60% |
| Feb | -- | 788.89% | 11.84% | 33.68% | 278.14% |
| Mar | -- | -40.83% | -7.30% | 65.17% | 5.68% |
| Apr | -- | 9.16% | 25.84% | -5.01% | 10.00% |
| May | -- | -64.50% | 62.25% | -33.76% | -12.00% |
| Jun | -- | 11.11% | -29.40% | -7.14% | -8.48% |
| Jul | -- | -18.54% | -0.20% | -39.52% | -19.42% |
| Aug | -- | 50.00% | -12.50% | 17.65% | 18.38% |
| Sep | -- | 6.81% | -10.48% | -21.64% | -8.44% |
| Oct | -81.06% | -41.57% | 15.67% | -16.33%* | -30.82% |
| Nov | 83.33% | -41.74% | 40.17% | -- | 27.25% |
| Dec | -11.50% | -41.62% | -23.12% | -- | -25.41% |
| Total | -69.27% | -50.57% | 18.87% | -43.79% | -36.19% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: COCHW
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical signals indicate a range-bound market with neutral momentum
- Recent news headlines are mixed, but the FDA approval is a positive catalyst
- Low volatility and beta suggest a defensive posture
Primary Risks:
- Lack of strong technical momentum or sentiment indicators
- Uncertainty around earnings release and potential catalysts
Investment Thesis: COCHW's low volatility and range-bound market may provide an opportunity for investors seeking to establish a defensive position. However, the absence of strong technical signals and mixed news headlines suggest caution.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a neutral impact on sentiment, with one positive headline (FDA approval) and one neutral headline (new plugin release). The overall sentiment remains balanced.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: NEUTRAL Medium-term: RANGE-BOUND Long-term: BEARISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $0.08
- Middle Bollinger Band: $0.06
- Lower Bollinger Band: $0.05
- SMA 20: $0.06
- EMA 12: $0.06
Momentum Signals: RSI (14): 51.30 (neutral) MACD: Bullish (above signal line)
Volume Analysis: Volume trend is down, indicating selling pressure. Institutional interest signals are mixed.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: One positive headline (FDA approval) and one neutral headline (new plugin release).
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment due to mixed news headlines.
Catalyst Identification: The FDA approval for Envoy Medical's hearing device is a potential catalyst.
Market Narrative: The market narrative remains uncertain, with no clear direction or momentum.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low beta (0.25) indicates low risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is low compared to historical levels.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels are at $0.05 and $0.06, which could provide some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: COCHW's performance is in line with the overall market.
Institutional Activity: Mixed institutional interest signals.
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation suggests a moderate correlation between COCHW and the market.
Relative Valuation: COCHW is positioned within its trading range, making it difficult to determine value relative to peers.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support at $0.05 and $0.06
- Resistance at $0.08 (upper Bollinger Band)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear breakout or breakdown levels are present.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: The FDA approval for Envoy Medical's hearing device is a potential catalyst.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels could be set around the support levels of $0.05 and $0.06, with position sizing considerations based on risk tolerance.
COCHW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 162
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $0K | #4697 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
COCHW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $10.34K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
COCHW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-04| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 | Brent T. Lucas | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +32,856 | $0.60 | $19.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-17 | Chas McKhann | Director | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-17 | Mona Chetan Patel | Director | Buy (P) | +312,500 | $0.40 | $125.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Charles Brynelsen | Director | Buy (P) | +1,000,000 | $0.40 | $400.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Brent T. Lucas | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +62,500 | $0.40 | $25.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Susan Kantor | Director | Buy (P) | +96,150 | $0.40 | $38.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Robert Potashnick | Interim CFO | Buy (P) | +212,500 | $0.40 | $85.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-17 | Glen A Taylor | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +18,750,000 | $0.40 | $7.50M | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-09 | Robert Potashnick | Interim CFO | Grant (A) | +15,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-09 | Brent T. Lucas | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-10 | Brent T. Lucas | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +18,105 | $0.71 | $12.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-05 | Janis Smith-Gomez | Director | Grant (A) | +25,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-05 | Mona Chetan Patel | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-05 | Susan Kantor | Director | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-05 | Michael Curtis Crowe | Director | Grant (A) | +25,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
COCHW Insider Holdings
8 insiders · @ $0.03| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glen A Taylor | Director | 26,513,991 | $665.5K | $7.50M | 11 | 2026-02-17 |
| 2 | Anzu SPAC GP I LLC | 10%+ Owner | 2,028,986 | $50.9K | $0 | 1 | 2024-12-26 |
| 3 | Charles Brynelsen | Director | 1,050,000 | $26.4K | $482.4K | 4 | 2026-02-17 |
| 4 | Whitney Haring-Smith | 10%+ Owner | 1,000,000 | $25.1K | $0 | 1 | 2024-11-21 |
| 5 | Brent T. Lucas | Chief Executive Officer | 342,666 | $8.6K | $37.0K | 9 | 2026-06-04 |
| 6 | Mona Chetan Patel | Director | 332,500 | $8.3K | $165.5K | 7 | 2026-02-17 |
| 7 | Robert Potashnick | Interim CFO | 212,500 | $5.3K | $85.0K | 2 | 2026-02-17 |
| 8 | Susan Kantor | Director | 174,037 | $4.4K | $38.5K | 5 | 2026-02-17 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.