BenzingaT3·8mo ago
ELME Elme Communities
XNYS
1.77
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
ELME
$1.77
—
Key stats
$1.77
- 52-Week Range
- $1.26 – $17.68
- YTD
- -89.90%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 22.45
- Straddle Price
- $5.00
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.00
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Open
- $1.76
- Day Range
- $1.76 – $1.78
- Volume
- 160,149
- Prev Close
- $1.76
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.15% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.72 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.75% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 6.91% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +277.4pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +1.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.01 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -66.9% |
| Book / Price | 699.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 100.0% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 20.0% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.16 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.70 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.75 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 240.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.2B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: AMH, EQR, ESS, VTR, WELL
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
Blended Fair Value
$19.38
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $10.12 | 48% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $201.49 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 42.2× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $23.88 | 14% | median 20.5× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | $37.30 | 19% | median 3.0× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/S | $21.73 | 19% | median 7.6× · 5 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.70 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-22 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (6798) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
- Employees
- 91
- List Date
- 1972-06-01
- CIK
- 0000104894
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-22 (Pre-Market)
- Headquarters
- Bethesda, MD
- Homepage
- https://www.elmecommunities.com
Elme Communities is a real estate investment trust engaged in owning and operating properties in the greater Washington DC metropolitan area. The company's real estate portfolio is comprised of office, retail, and multifamily properties located near transportation nodes. It derives nearly all of its income in the form of rental revenue from tenants organized into long-term leases. The company's office assets contribute the majority of this income, while the rest is split fairly evenly between its retail and multifamily locations. Elme Communities' tenants are banking, consulting, law, and fina…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 8.54% | -0.96% | 1.19% | -87.44% | -19.67% |
| Feb | -- | -2.82% | -10.62% | 15.01% | -1.83% | -0.06% |
| Mar | -- | -2.08% | 7.41% | 0.12% | -6.07% | -0.16% |
| Apr | -- | -2.93% | 11.47% | -9.42% | 7.43% | 1.64% |
| May | -- | -11.84% | 1.58% | 0.94% | -4.65% | -3.49% |
| Jun | -- | 9.09% | 2.58% | -0.81% | -27.80% | -4.24% |
| Jul | -- | -2.40% | 5.51% | -5.40% | 3.21% | 0.23% |
| Aug | -- | -0.65% | 5.75% | 13.04% | 2.44% | 5.14% |
| Sep | -- | -10.56% | -0.57% | -0.88% | 3.57% | -2.11% |
| Oct | 8.40% | -5.27% | -2.65% | -2.66% | 0.57%* | -0.32% |
| Nov | 4.05% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 5.85% | -- | 4.33% |
| Dec | -9.28% | 6.41% | -9.43% | 0.64% | -- | -2.91% |
| Total | 2.32% | -11.81% | 11.04% | 16.14% | -90.57% | -14.57% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.75
SMA 50: $1.70
SMA 200: $2.03
Current: $1.77
EMA 12: $1.75
EMA 26: $1.74
MACD: 0.0185 | Signal: -0.0015
BULLISH
ADX (14): 43.83
STRONG TREND
+DI: 22.28
−DI: 6.32
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 65.34
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 52.38
Stoch %D: 58.20
Williams %R: -33.33
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.78
BB Lower: $1.72
NEUTRAL
OBV: -65,374,640
Vol SMA 20: 1,457,368
Vol ROC: -89.62%
ATR: $0.02
True Range: $0.02
HV 20: 12.0%
HV 30: 20.4%
HV 60: 17.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10) - ELME is trading within a defined range, with mixed technical and news signals.
Key Drivers:
- The recent decline in price is likely due to the negative sentiment from the S&P MidCap 400 news headline.
- The MACD signal line crossover indicates bullish momentum, but RSI remains neutral.
Primary Risks:
- High volatility and potential for a sharp move if the stock breaks out of its current range.
- Negative news sentiment may continue to weigh on the stock price.
Investment Thesis: ELME is trading within a defined range, with mixed technical and news signals. The recent decline in price is likely due to negative sentiment from the S&P MidCap 400 news headline. However, the MACD signal line crossover indicates bullish momentum, suggesting a potential upward move if the stock breaks out of its current range.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The negative sentiment from the S&P MidCap 400 news headline has likely contributed to the recent decline in price.
Technical Analysis Trend Direction:
- Short-term: NEUTRAL (range-bound)
- Medium-term: BEARISH (declining trend since November 2025)
- Long-term: BULLISH (upward trend since July 2024)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $1.71
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.59
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (60.92) - not overbought or oversold. MACD signal line crossover: Bullish momentum.
Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price touching upper band).
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 514512.30
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): -75692758.86
- Volume Rate of Change: -67.02% - indicating a decline in buying pressure.
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: The recent headlines are mixed, with one negative headline from the S&P MidCap 400 and several neutral headlines related to ELME's dividend distribution and special liquidating distribution.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (negative sentiment from S&P MidCap 400 news headline balanced by neutral sentiment from other headlines).
Catalyst Identification: The upcoming earnings date may provide a catalyst for the stock price, but no earnings data is currently available.
Market Narrative: The negative sentiment from the S&P MidCap 400 news headline has likely contributed to the recent decline in price. However, the MACD signal line crossover indicates bullish momentum, suggesting a potential upward move if the stock breaks out of its current range.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation: Low risk (beta = 0.10) - ELME moves less than the market.
Volatility Regime: Low volatility - stock moves less than the market.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Medium
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: Bearish
Downside Protection: The support levels from the Bollinger Bands and moving averages may provide a floor for the stock price if it continues to decline.
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance: ELME is trading within its sector, with no notable outperformance or underperformance.
Institutional Activity: Mixed institutional activity - some buying pressure but also selling interest.
Correlation Analysis: ELME has a low correlation coefficient (0.01) with the market, indicating that it may not be strongly influenced by broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: ELME is trading within its sector, with no notable overvaluation or undervaluation.
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $1.71
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.59
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout level: $1.75 (above the upper Bollinger Band)
- Breakdown level: $1.55 (below the lower Bollinger Band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: The upcoming earnings date may provide a catalyst for the stock price, but no earnings data is currently available.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations should be based on the current market conditions and technical signals.
Generated
News
All ELME news →
BenzingaT3·9mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·11mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·13mo ago
Investing.comT3·27mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·28mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·28mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·30mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·30mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·30mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
Earnings History
10 of 10 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
12.26%
Avg Actual Move
1.03%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-31 | Pre-Market | 8.97% | 0.49% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2023-10-26 | Pre-Market | 9.91% | 0.15% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2024-02-15 | Pre-Market | 13.09% | 2.46% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2024-05-01 | Pre-Market | 6.00% | 0.07% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2024-08-01 | Pre-Market | 17.01% | 1.46% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2024-11-04 | Pre-Market | 26.40% | 1.33% | 0.05x | Within |
| 2025-02-13 | Pre-Market | 8.04% | 1.71% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2025-05-01 | Pre-Market | 10.76% | 2.18% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2025-08-05 | Pre-Market | 12.63% | 0.18% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2025-10-23 | Pre-Market | 9.79% | 0.30% | 0.03x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
ELME Options Activity & IV Rank
ELME IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 201.9%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $5.00
7-DTE Move: $5.00
Days to Exp: 29 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 1
Put Volume: 1
P/C Volume: 1.0
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 3
Put OI: 1
P/C OI: 0.333
Total OI: 4
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $2.50
ATM Put: $2.50
Call %: 141.2%
Put %: 141.2%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 1,835
Chain OI: 2,919
Last Updated: 10/22/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
HIGH γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 97th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
97%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.47
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.48
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.50
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.48: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.50: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 4 ATM contracts, 0k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM 43.1% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)22.4LowOct 22
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$5.00Oct 22
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.1435
Alpha: -114.94%
Correlation: 0.0189
R-Squared: 0.0%
Stock Volatility: 96.8%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own ELME
4 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $3.3M | #2297 of 3716 | -58.0% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $1.4M | #3282 of 6285 | -36.4% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $369K | #1697 of 1945 | -1.3% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $1K | #4580 of 4729 | -35.9% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ELME Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 88,046,500 (as of 2025-09-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
2 filers$464.37K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arkhouse Management Co. LP | $372.61K | 80.24% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $91.76K | 19.76% | 2026-06-30 |
2 filers$117.77K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $106.56K | 90.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $11.21K | 9.51% | 2026-06-30 |
ELME Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-12-16Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | Thomas H Nolan Jr | Director | Award (A) | +2,883 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-16 | Jennifer S Banner | Director | Award (A) | +2,883 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-16 | Susan Carras | Director | Award (A) | +2,883 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-16 | Ellen M. Goitia | Director | Award (A) | +2,883 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-16 | Anthony L. Winns | Director | Award (A) | +2,883 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-16 | Ron D. Sturzenegger | Director | Award (A) | +2,883 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-16 | Benjamin S Butcher | Director | Award (A) | +2,883 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-11-21 | Paul T. McDermott | President, CEO & Chairman | Mixed | +216,611 | $16.61 | -$3.36M | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-21 | Steven Freishtat | EVP & CFO | Mixed | +31,922 | $16.61 | -$779.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-21 | Wade Drew Hammond | SVP, CAO & Treasurer | Mixed | +22,594 | $16.61 | -$542.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-21 | Tiffany Michelle Butcher | EVP & COO | Mixed | +55,698 | $16.61 | -$1.41M | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-14 | Susan Lilly Gerock | SVP IT & CIO | Tax (F) | −7,069 | $16.61 | -$117.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-14 | Steven Freishtat | EVP & CFO | Tax (F) | −8,364 | $16.61 | -$138.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-14 | Tiffany Michelle Butcher | EVP & COO | Tax (F) | −16,347 | $16.61 | -$271.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-14 | Wade Drew Hammond | SVP, CAO & Treasurer | Tax (F) | −6,334 | $16.61 | -$105.2K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
ELME Insider Holdings
12 insiders · @ $1.77
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paul T. McDermott | President, CEO & Chairman | 988,334 | $1.75M | $0 | 9 | 2025-11-21 |
| 2 | Tiffany Michelle Butcher | EVP & COO | 181,558 | $321.4K | $0 | 10 | 2025-11-21 |
| 3 | Benjamin S Butcher | Director | 99,013 | $175.3K | $0 | 19 | 2025-12-16 |
| 4 | Steven Freishtat | EVP & CFO | 86,454 | $153.0K | $0 | 6 | 2025-11-21 |
| 5 | Wade Drew Hammond | SVP, CAO & Treasurer | 74,022 | $131.0K | $0 | 9 | 2025-11-21 |
| 6 | Anthony L. Winns | Director | 73,888 | $130.8K | $0 | 7 | 2025-12-16 |
| 7 | Susan Lilly Gerock | SVP IT & CIO | 66,660 | $118.0K | $0 | 7 | 2025-11-14 |
| 8 | Thomas H Nolan Jr | Director | 60,359 | $106.8K | $0 | 7 | 2025-12-16 |
| 9 | Ellen M. Goitia | Director | 47,850 | $84.7K | $0 | 7 | 2025-12-16 |
| 10 | Jennifer S Banner | Director | 35,167 | $62.2K | $0 | 19 | 2025-12-16 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ELME Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Dec 16, 2025Directors 7
- Anthony L. Winns · since Jul 28, 2011
- Benjamin S Butcher · since Jun 10, 2014
- Thomas H Nolan Jr · since Jan 22, 2015
- Ellen M. Goitia · since Jun 1, 2017
- Jennifer S Banner · since May 26, 2022
- Susan Carras · since Sep 8, 2023
- Ron D. Sturzenegger · since Mar 19, 2025
Officers 2
- Tiffany Michelle Butcher · EVP & COO · since Jul 10, 2023
- Wade Drew Hammond · SVP, CAO & Treasurer · listed since Sep 2023
Changes in the last 10 years (21)
| Jan 21, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Steven Freishtat as EVP & CFO in an SEC filing |
| Jan 21, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Paul T. McDermott from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 21, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Paul T. McDermott as President, CEO & Chairman in an SEC filing |
| Nov 10, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Susan Lilly Gerock as SVP IT & CIO in an SEC filing |
| Mar 19, 2025 | Ron D. Sturzenegger became a director |
| Sep 21, 2023 | Wade Drew Hammond listed as SVP, CAO & Treasurer (previously VP/CAO & Treasurer) in SEC filings |
| Sep 8, 2023 | Susan Carras became a director |
| Jul 10, 2023 | Tiffany Michelle Butcher became EVP & COO |
| Mar 1, 2023 | Steven Freishtat became EVP & CFO |
| Dec 19, 2022 | Susan Lilly Gerock listed as SVP IT & CIO (previously SVP & CIO) in SEC filings |
| Nov 8, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Stephen Edward Riffee as EVP & CFO in an SEC filing |
| May 26, 2022 | Jennifer S Banner became a director |
| Feb 25, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Taryn D. Fielder as SVP/Gen Counsel, Corp Sec in an SEC filing |
| Feb 2, 2022 | Susan Lilly Gerock became SVP & CIO |
| Dec 17, 2020 | Taryn D. Fielder listed as SVP/Gen Counsel, Corp Sec (previously SVP, GC & Corporate Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Dec 17, 2020 | Stephen Edward Riffee listed as EVP & CFO (previously E.v.p. & CFO) in SEC filings |
| Dec 17, 2020 | Paul T. McDermott listed as President, CEO & Chairman (previously President, CEO & Director) in SEC filings |
| Feb 16, 2018 | Wade Drew Hammond listed as VP/CAO & Treasurer (previously VP & CAO & Controller) in SEC filings |
| Jan 2, 2018 | Paul T. McDermott first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jun 1, 2017 | Ellen M. Goitia became a director |
| Mar 29, 2017 | Taryn D. Fielder became SVP, GC & Corporate Secretary |
Not reported recently (5)
- Edward S Civera · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 16, 2023
- William G Byrnes · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 16, 2023
- Edward J. Murn IV · Last reported as Managing Director, Residential in an SEC filing dated Feb 14, 2020
- Charles T Nason · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 16, 2019
- Thomas Q. Bakke · Last reported as EVP & Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 12, 2019
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
6 ETFs hold ELME
6 shown · $6.81M total exposure · 0.02% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $4.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $889,340 | $4.2B | 2026-10-20 |
| 3 | FREI Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund ETF | Fidelity | 0.02% | $797,507 | — | 2026-10-20 |
| 4 | HAUS Residential REIT ETF | Nport | 2.33% | $187,245 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 5 | AVRE Avantis Real Estate ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $15,268 | $867.9M | 2026-10-20 |
| 6 | EBI Longview Advantage ETF | Nport | 0.00% | $31 | — | 2026-05-31 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-1.52
TTM Revenue
$246.96M
TTM Net Income
$-134.77M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$86.44M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $62.10M | $-123.51M | $-1.40 | $15.91M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $62.10M | $-3.57M | $-0.04 | $29.85M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $61.49M | $-4.67M | $-0.05 | $16.18M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $61.26M | $-3.02M | $-0.03 | $24.50M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $61.05M | $-2.97M | $-0.03 | $20.67M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $60.10M | $-3.47M | $-0.04 | $28.86M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $59.51M | $-3.65M | $-0.04 | $21.22M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $58.85M | $-3.10M | $-0.04 | $22.85M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $56.65M | $-43.62M | $-0.50 | $15.57M |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $56.60M | $-2.61M | $-0.03 | $29.96M |
| Q1 '23 | 2023-03-31 | $55.81M | $-3.64M | $-0.04 | $16.29M |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | $55.59M | $-3.53M | $-0.04 | $21.75M |
Q3 2025 • period ending 2025-09-30 • filed 2025-10-24
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
0.17
P/S
0.63
EV/EBITDA
3.07
EV/Sales
1.36
ROE
-14.8%
ROA
-8.0%
Div Yield
40.94%
FCF Yield
55.47%
Debt/Equity
0.20
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$155.84M
as of 2026-10-22
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
2.54M
SI % of Float
2.91%
Days to Cover
1.93
Short Vol Ratio
38.9%
Free Float
87.44M
Float %
98.4%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-21 • Float 2026-05-15