EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

EZPZ — —
Key stats
About

Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
BATS
Inception
2025-02-20
Has Options
No
Fund profile
holdings as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data
Expense ratio
0.19%
issuer, Oct 22, 2026
Assets
$17M
issuer-reported, Oct 21, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$169K
30 sessions
Holdings
8
top 10 are 100.0%
Listed
Feb 20, 2025
Cboe BZX
Net asset value
$21.00
issuer, Oct 21, 2026 · closed +0.31% to NAV
Median bid/ask spread
0.46%
30 days, issuer-reported
Return on NAV, 1 year
−29.9%
issuer, through Sep 30, 2026
Closure risk, 12 months
8.1%
low: trading volume, age, trailing return · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
44
how it is built
Cost95
Liquidity8
Scale0
Diversificationn/a

Moves with. Bitcoin (98% of its variance, beta 1.05). These factors explain 99% of its daily moves over the last year.

All 8 holdingsOverlap toolAll Crypto Basket ETFs

Fund flows
daily as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data
Oct 20, 2026
$0
latest day
Latest 5 trading days
$0
Year to date
$0
Each day
Net creations of EZPZ by day, Oct 12, 2026 to Oct 20, 2026
DayNet flow
Oct 20, 2026$0
Oct 16, 2026$0
Oct 15, 2026$0
Oct 14, 2026$0
Oct 13, 2026$0
Oct 12, 2026$0

Daily figures are the change in shares outstanding times net asset value, both as the issuer publishes them each day.

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
ETHBiShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF Shares of Fractional Undivided Beneficial Interest—0.25%$1.1B—compare
SSKREX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF—0.75%$81M−49.7%compare
BETHProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF——$12M−39.2%compare
BTFCoinShares ETF Trust CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF—1.27%$11M−72.6%compare
BETEProShares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight ETF——$8.5M−46.0%compare

The largest other funds in the Crypto Basket category.

ETF Profile
holdings as of 2026-10-21
Holdings
8
AUM
$16.8M
Provider
Franklin
Inception
2025-02-20
Exchange
BATS
Data As Of
2026-10-21
Expense Ratio
0.19%
Dividend Yield
—
Distribution
—
Asset Allocation
Top Holdings
top 8 of 8 holdings
Symbol Name Weight % Asset Class Country
— BITCOIN 78.04% Commodity US
— ETHEREUM 11.97% Commodity US
— XRP 5.02% Commodity —
— SOLANA 3.47% Commodity US
— DOGE 0.74% Commodity US
— ADA 0.51% Commodity —
— XLM 0.28% Commodity —
— Net Current Assets -0.03% Cash/Money Market —
Chart
Seasonality
Month'25'26Avg
Jan---8.44%-8.44%
Feb-15.23%-16.22%-15.72%
Mar-5.28%-1.86%-3.57%
Apr9.03%10.06%9.54%
May11.56%-6.69%2.44%
Jun2.67%-18.28%-7.81%
Jul15.81%5.30%10.55%
Aug-0.18%25.11%12.46%
Sep2.45%9.08%5.77%
Oct-7.16%-1.86%*-4.51%
Nov-14.90%---14.90%
Dec1.60%--1.60%
Total-4.67%-10.90%-7.79%
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $20.99
SMA 50: $19.89
SMA 200: $18.57
Current: $21.06
EMA 12: $20.72
EMA 26: $20.57
MACD: 0.1546 | Signal: -0.1377
BULLISH
ADX (14): 21.89
WEAK TREND
+DI: 33.33
−DI: 28.72

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 56.83
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 34.13
Stoch %D: 26.12
Williams %R: -45.55

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $21.88
BB Lower: $20.10
NEUTRAL
OBV: -756,543
Vol SMA 20: 9,218
Vol ROC: -26.67%
ATR: $0.45
True Range: $0.58
HV 20: 22.1%
HV 30: 35.9%
HV 60: 39.1%

Data Summary

Data Points: 420
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-02-20T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.

Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.

EZPZ Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 1.9146
Alpha: -51.18%
Correlation: 0.5035
R-Squared: 25.4%
Stock Volatility: 48.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

EZPZ Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

10 filers309,360 shares$5.81M value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Oasis Advisors, LLC 196,660 $4.17M 71.74% — 2026-09-30
2 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 47,537 $692.28K 11.92% — 2026-06-30
3 Bank of New York Mellon Corp Custodian 26,017 $378.88K 6.52% — 2026-06-30
4 Sanctuary Advisors, LLC 22,381 $325.93K 5.61% — 2026-06-30
5 Compass Ion Advisors, LLC 15,752 $229.40K 3.95% — 2026-06-30
6 Clearstead Advisors, LLC 449 $6.54K 0.11% — 2026-06-30
7 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 400 $5.82K 0.10% — 2026-06-30
8 CWM, LLC Custodian 120 $2.07K 0.04% — 2026-03-31
9 HARBOUR INVESTMENTS, INC. 40 $583 0.01% — 2026-06-30
10 EverSource Wealth Advisors, LLC Custodian 4 $55 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month