The expectation that the company will report strong Q1 2027 revenue isn't distracting investors from other concerning news.
FPS Forgent Power Solutions, Inc.
XNYS 25.12 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
FPS
$25.12
—
Key stats
$25.12
Pre-market
$25.05
-0.28%
- 52-Week Range
- $23.16 – $66.00
- YTD
- -13.38%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 75.53
- Straddle Price
- $5.80
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 14.21
- Market Cap
- $6.6B
- Open
- $24.62
- Day Range
- $23.90 – $25.99
- Volume
- 9,199,618
- Prev Close
- $24.22
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.13% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.67 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 14.29% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.40% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +36.1pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 12.3% |
| Book / Price | 8.3% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.86 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $34.37 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $35.12 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 158.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.5B |
Peers used for multiples: ASML, ETN, GEV, LRCX, NVT, POWL, PWR, TDG
60-Day Conviction
56%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 24, 2026
$25.85
α +2.9%
rank 43%
conviction
97%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 23, 2026
$25.41
α +1.1%
rank 49%
conviction
38%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 21, 2027
$25.56
α +1.8%
rank 50%
conviction
56%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $8.89 | 16% | median 34.5× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 25.1× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $15.87 | 16% | median 7.9× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $23.89 | 16% | median 4.8× · 7 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $34.37 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $24.07 | 53% | 23 strikes · skew -0.00 |
As of 2026-10-26 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL APPARATUS (3620) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $6.6B
- Employees
- 3,450
- List Date
- 2026-02-05
- CIK
- 0002080126
- Headquarters
- Commerce, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.forgentpower.com
Forgent Power Solutions Inc is a designer and manufacturer of electrical distribution equipment used in data centers, the power grid and energy-intensive industrial facilities. It manufacture and sell include automatic transfer switches (ATS), dry type transformers, electrical houses (eHouse), generator connection cabinets, liquid filled transformers, panelboards, power distribution units (PDU), power skids, remote power panels (RPP), switchboards, switchgear, and tap boxes. The company is organized and operates as one reportable segment, which carries out business activities related to the de…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | 18.59% | 18.59% |
| Mar | -18.67% | -18.67% |
| Apr | 29.15% | 29.15% |
| May | 39.37% | 39.37% |
| Jun | -0.87% | -0.87% |
| Jul | -34.24% | -34.24% |
| Aug | -15.84% | -15.84% |
| Sep | 27.91% | 27.91% |
| Oct | -32.71%* | -32.71% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -18.02% | -18.02% |
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $34.55
SMA 50: $34.08
SMA 200: —
Current: $25.12
EMA 12: $30.38
EMA 26: $33.09
MACD: -2.7028 | Signal: -1.4323
BEARISH
ADX (14): 29.29
TREND
+DI: 14.09
−DI: 39.27
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 30.41
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 8.76
Stoch %D: 10.62
Williams %R: -89.06
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $45.19
BB Lower: $23.90
NEUTRAL
OBV: 69,166,568
Vol SMA 20: 10,020,721
Vol ROC: 51.33%
ATR: $2.74
True Range: $2.09
HV 20: 107.5%
HV 30: 106.3%
HV 60: 90.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 182
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-02-05T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is my analysis of FPS stock:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH (confidence level: 7/10)
Key drivers and primary risks:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD and RSI
- High volatility, which could lead to significant price swings
- No recent news available, which may indicate a lack of catalysts for growth
Primary risks:
- Technical breakdown risk due to bearish momentum signals.
- High volatility may lead to increased uncertainty and potential losses.
Recent news sentiment impact: None (no recent news available).
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Bearish
- Medium-term: Bearish
- Long-term: Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $38.80
- Middle Line (SMA 20): $32.78
- Lower Bollinger Band: $26.75
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (34.57), indicating no strong buying or selling pressure.
- MACD signal: Bearish (crossover below signal line).
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze, which may indicate a potential breakout.
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 5076715.25
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 63347085.17
- Volume Rate of Change: 44.48%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: None available.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral
Catalyst Identification: No recent news or earnings information available.
Market Narrative: No clear market narrative due to lack of recent news and mixed technical signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation:
- Beta: 3.36 (vs SPY), indicating high risk relative to the broader market.
Volatility Regime:
- Current vs historical volatility levels: High, with a HV20 of 53.4%, HV30 of 71.5%, and HV60 of 73.8%.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Low (12.4%)
- Current IV: 91.8%
- Expected Move: $6.55 (36 DTE), 7-DTE: $4.60
- Volume Flow: 517 calls vs 461 puts
- Open Interest: 3,145 calls vs 1,047 puts
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: Neutral sentiment (0.89)
- Put/Call OI Ratio: Defensive bias (0.33)
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: Middle Line (SMA 20) at $32.78 and Lower Bollinger Band at $26.75.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: No sector performance data available.
Institutional Activity: No institutional activity data available.
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation: 0.57, indicating a relatively strong positive correlation with the broader market (SPY).
Relative Valuation: No relative valuation data available.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: Middle Line (SMA 20) at $32.78 and Lower Bollinger Band at $26.75
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band at $38.80
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Short-term: Break below Middle Line (SMA 20) for further bearish momentum.
- Medium-term: Break above Upper Bollinger Band for a potential uptrend.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No time-sensitive catalysts available.
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: Consider setting stop-loss orders at $26.75 or lower to limit potential losses in the event of a breakdown.
- Position sizing considerations: Consider adjusting position sizes based on volatility and risk tolerance.
I hope this comprehensive analysis meets your requirements!
Generated
News
All FPS news →
Earnings History
2 of 3 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
13.64%
Avg Actual Move
10.46%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-16 | Pre-Market | 18.08% | 11.59% | 0.64x | Within |
| 2026-05-14 | After-Close | 4.68% | 10.30% | 2.20x | Exceeded |
| 2026-09-15 | Pre-Market | 18.16% | 9.50% | 0.52x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
FPS Options Activity & IV Rank
FPS IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 100.1%
7-DTE IV: 106.8%
Expected Move: $5.80
7-DTE Move: $2.50
Days to Exp: 32 (2026-11-27)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 43
Put Volume: 611
P/C Volume: 14.209
BEARISH
Call OI: 88
Put OI: 33
P/C OI: 0.375
Total OI: 121
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $2.83
ATM Put: $2.98
Call %: 11.2%
Put %: 11.8%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 9,416
Chain OI: 145,596
Last Updated: 10/26/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 31st percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
31%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.24
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.44
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.76
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.44: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.76: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 61 ATM contracts, 26k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
100%
+20.5
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · ATM 102.5% / Wing 123.0%
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · ATM 98.6% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)21.1LowOct 26
IV Rank (30 DTE)75.5HighOct 26
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$5.80Oct 26
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.4798
Alpha: -45.39%
Correlation: 0.5375
R-Squared: 28.9%
Stock Volatility: 85.5%
Market Volatility: 13.2%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 181
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 181
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own FPS
7 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coatue Management Hedge fund Philippe Laffont | $1.15B | #17 of 66 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $93.3M | #173 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $43.0M | #689 of 3716 | -36.9% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $39.8M | #799 of 6285 | -84.1% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $36.0M | #416 of 1945 | -59.0% | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $35.1M | #69 of 251 | +515.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $2.0M | #1378 of 4729 | +3404.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
FPS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 500 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
15 filers$132.31M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $37.34M | 28.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $23.09M | 17.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $20.14M | 15.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Caption Management, LLC | $18.15M | 13.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $15.61M | 11.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Hudson Bay Capital Management LP | $5.59M | 4.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $4.52M | 3.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $3.54M | 2.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.69M | 1.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $1.40M | 1.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Ausdal Financial Partners, Inc. | $698.25K | 0.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $424.54K | 0.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | B. Riley Wealth Advisors, Inc. | $59.90K | 0.05% | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | Sanctuary Advisors, LLC | $39.10K | 0.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Walleye Trading LLC | $22.34K | 0.02% | 2026-06-30 |
9 filers$102.22M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $34.09M | 33.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $28.53M | 27.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $19.24M | 18.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $5.59M | 5.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $4.86M | 4.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $4.40M | 4.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $3.06M | 2.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $1.96M | 1.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $502.74K | 0.49% | 2026-06-30 |
FPS Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-03Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | Inez Lund | Chief Accounting Officer | Award (A) | +7,043 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Tyson Hottinger | Chief Legal Officer | Award (A) | +10,564 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Ryan Fiedler | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +2,817 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-03 | Gary John Niederpruem | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +88,029 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-08 | Peter Joseph Jonna | Director | Mixed | −174,564,450 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-08 | Forgent Parent III LP | Director | Mixed | −261,846,675 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-08 | Neos Partners GP, LLC | Director | Mixed | −232,752,600 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Sergey Gofer | Director | Mixed | −196,618,086 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Neos Partners GP, LLC | Director | Mixed | −262,157,448 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Forgent Parent IV LP | Director | Mixed | −294,927,129 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | Trey Bivins | Director | Mixed | −142,300,770 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | Forgent Parent II LP | Director | Mixed | −213,451,155 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-01 | Neos Partners I-B LP | Director | Mixed | −189,734,360 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-11 | Peter Joseph Jonna | Director | Mixed | −35,472,216 | $25.79 | -$1.30B | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-11 | Neos Partners I GP LLC | Director | Mixed | −47,296,288 | $25.79 | -$1.73B | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
FPS Insider Holdings
13 insiders · @ $25.12
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neos Partners I-B LP | Director | 179,765,606 | — | $0 | 1 | 2026-04-01 |
| 2 | Trey Bivins | Director | 179,765,606 | — | $0 | 1 | 2026-04-01 |
| 3 | Neos Partners I GP LLC | Director | 168,982,401 | — | -$1.73B | 1 | 2026-02-11 |
| 4 | Sergey Gofer | Director | 161,117,925 | — | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-03 |
| 5 | Forgent Parent II LP | Director | 145,265,606 | — | $0 | 1 | 2026-04-01 |
| 6 | Forgent Parent IV LP | Director | 112,495,925 | — | -$1.95B | 2 | 2026-06-03 |
| 7 | Peter Joseph Jonna | Director | 83,401,850 | — | -$1.30B | 2 | 2026-07-08 |
| 8 | Neos Partners GP, LLC | Director | 83,401,850 | — | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-08 |
| 9 | Forgent Parent III LP | Director | 83,401,850 | — | $0 | 1 | 2026-07-08 |
| 10 | Gary John Niederpruem | Chief Executive Officer | 88,029 | — | $0 | 1 | 2026-09-03 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
FPS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 3, 2026Directors 25
- Anthony L Trunzo · since Feb 5, 2026
- David Savage · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent I GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent I LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent II GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent II LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent III GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent III LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent IV GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent IV LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Frank R. Cannova · since Feb 5, 2026
- Gary John Niederpruem · since Feb 5, 2026
- Gregory M Spierkel · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neel Bhatia · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners GP, LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I Expansion GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I Expansion LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I-A LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I-B LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners, LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Peter Joseph Jonna · since Feb 5, 2026
- Sergey Gofer · since Feb 5, 2026
- Trey Bivins · since Feb 5, 2026
Officers 4
- Gary John Niederpruem · Chief Executive Officer · since Feb 5, 2026
- Ryan Fiedler · Chief Financial Officer · since Feb 5, 2026
- Inez Lund · Chief Accounting Officer · since Feb 5, 2026
- Tyson Hottinger · Chief Legal Officer · since Feb 5, 2026
10% owners 21
- David Savage · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent I GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent I LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent II GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent II LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent III GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent III LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent IV GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Forgent Parent IV LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Frank R. Cannova · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners GP, LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I Expansion GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I Expansion LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I GP LLC (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I-A LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners I-B LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Neos Partners, LP (entity) · since Feb 5, 2026
- Peter Joseph Jonna · since Feb 5, 2026
- Sergey Gofer · since Feb 5, 2026
- Trey Bivins · since Feb 5, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (50)
| Feb 5, 2026 | Tyson Hottinger became Chief Legal Officer |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Trey Bivins became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Trey Bivins became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Sergey Gofer became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Sergey Gofer became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Ryan Fiedler became Chief Financial Officer |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Peter Joseph Jonna became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Peter Joseph Jonna became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners, LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners, LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I-B LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I-B LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I-A LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I-A LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I GP LLC became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I GP LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I Expansion LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I Expansion LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I Expansion GP LLC became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners I Expansion GP LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners GP, LLC became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neos Partners GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Neel Bhatia became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Inez Lund became Chief Accounting Officer |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Gregory M Spierkel became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Gary John Niederpruem became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Gary John Niederpruem became Chief Executive Officer |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Frank R. Cannova became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Frank R. Cannova became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent IV LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent IV LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent IV GP LLC became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent IV GP LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent III LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent III LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent III GP LLC became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent III GP LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent II LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent II LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent II GP LLC became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent II GP LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent I LP became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent I LP became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent I GP LLC became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Forgent Parent I GP LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | David Savage became a director |
| Feb 5, 2026 | David Savage became a 10% owner |
| Feb 5, 2026 | Anthony L Trunzo became a director |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
65 ETFs hold FPS
25 shown · $1.01B total exposure · 0.10% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance® ETF | First Trust | 2.59% | $210.5M | $8.1B | 2026-10-23 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $210.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.08% | $148.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | VBK Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.19% | $82.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.09% | $81.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | GRID First Trust NASDAQ® Clean Edge® Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | First Trust | 0.63% | $69.8M | $11.1B | 2026-10-23 |
| 7 | PAVE Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | Global X | 0.43% | $57.9M | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 8 | IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $25.9M | $18.9B | 2026-10-23 |
| 9 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.10% | $22.7M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 10 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $19.3M | $57.3B | 2026-10-23 |
| 11 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $17.3M | $123.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 12 | SCHM Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.09% | $12.7M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 13 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $11.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $6.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $6.1M | $96.5B | 2026-10-23 |
| 16 | JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | Janus | 0.58% | $5.8M | $1.0B | 2026-10-23 |
| 17 | FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | Nport | 0.07% | $4.8M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 18 | IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | Nport | 2.00% | $3.6M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.01% | $3.2M | $48.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 20 | SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | Nport | 0.01% | $2.8M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 21 | SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $2.7M | $4.1B | 2026-10-23 |
| 22 | BCTK Baron Technology ETF | Nport | 1.24% | $2.5M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | Nport | 1.34% | $2.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | ILDR First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | First Trust | 0.51% | $1.7M | $337.8M | 2026-10-23 |
| 25 | FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.07% | $1.6M | $2.2B | 2026-10-23 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$18533.00
TTM Revenue
$1.37B
TTM Net Income
$69.27M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (2 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $461.67M | $53.30M | — | $73.90M |
| Q3 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $378.71M | $18.29M | $18287.00 | $29.17M |
Q4 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-09-15
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
0.00
P/B
0.00
P/S
0.00
EV/EBITDA
2.26
EV/Sales
0.35
ROE
10.3%
ROA
3.1%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.86
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$12.56K
as of 2026-10-26
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
14.20M
SI % of Float
7.43%
Days to Cover
1.18
Short Vol Ratio
36.9%
Free Float
191.18M
Float %
69.6%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-26 • Float 2026-09-08