HTO H2O America Common Stock
XNAS 58.48 DelayedStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
HTO
$58.48
—
Key stats
$58.48
- 52-Week Range
- $43.75 – $67.09
- YTD
- +18.74%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 66.63
- Straddle Price
- $3.72
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.19
- Market Cap
- $2.5B
- Open
- $58.90
- Day Range
- $58.02 – $59.24
- Volume
- 609,015
- Prev Close
- $58.90
Fair Value
MODEL: NEUTRAL
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.96% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.21% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +43.4pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 4.9% |
| Book / Price | 98.8% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 86.5% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -32.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.86 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $61.34 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $58.46 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 17.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $1.8B |
| Market Cap | $2B |
Peers used for multiples: AVA, AWK, AWR, CWEN, CWT, NWN, OTTR, WTRG
60-Day Conviction
19%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 25, 2026
$58.73
α +0.4%
rank 7%
conviction
27%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 24, 2026
$59.53
α +1.8%
rank 25%
conviction
59%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 22, 2027
$58.78
α +0.5%
rank 18%
conviction
19%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $9.83 | 24% | |
| Peer P/E | $58.56 | 7% | median 20.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $50.25 | 9% | median 11.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $103.99 | 12% | median 1.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $61.75 | 12% | median 2.8× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $61.34 | 37% | stability 63% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $56.43 | 0% | 8 strikes · skew -1.41 |
As of 2026-10-27 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- WATER SUPPLY (4941) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $2.5B
- Employees
- 837
- List Date
- 1972-06-01
- CIK
- 0000766829
- Headquarters
- San Jose, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.h2o-america.com
H2O America is a national investor-owned network of local water and wastewater utilities united by one purpose: delivering clean, high-quality water to the communities it calls home. Across approximately 407,000 water and wastewater service connections, the company invests in critical infrastructure to strengthen the water supply for generations to come. Its single reportable segment provides water utility and utility-related services to its customers.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 5.66% | 5.66% |
| Feb | -- | 2.44% | 2.44% |
| Mar | -- | 7.83% | 7.83% |
| Apr | -- | -3.85% | -3.85% |
| May | -4.70% | 1.94% | -1.38% |
| Jun | 0.25% | 6.69% | 3.47% |
| Jul | -9.50% | 1.57% | -3.96% |
| Aug | 1.78% | 3.75% | 2.77% |
| Sep | -0.41% | -3.40% | -1.91% |
| Oct | -2.20% | -2.86%* | -2.53% |
| Nov | 0.50% | -- | 0.50% |
| Dec | 4.55% | -- | 4.55% |
| Total | -9.94% | 20.69% | 5.37% |
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $58.46
SMA 50: $61.34
SMA 200: $58.69
Current: $58.48
EMA 12: $58.09
EMA 26: $59.12
MACD: -1.0254 | Signal: 0.2186
BEARISH
ADX (14): 42.09
STRONG TREND
+DI: 13.50
−DI: 22.13
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 45.89
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 80.22
Stoch %D: 59.33
Williams %R: -18.58
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $61.44
BB Lower: $55.48
NEUTRAL
OBV: 449,096
Vol SMA 20: 529,336
Vol ROC: 61.51%
ATR: $1.42
True Range: $1.22
HV 20: 26.4%
HV 30: 22.4%
HV 60: 19.9%
Data Summary
Data Points: 371
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-05-06T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary BULLISH (Confidence level: 8/10) Key drivers: Positive earnings and dividend news, technical momentum, and low volatility Primary risks: Overbought conditions, potential market correction Investment thesis: HTO's recent dividend increases, strong quarterly results, and favorable sector trends support a bullish outlook. Recent news sentiment impact: Overall positive news sentiment has contributed to the stock's upward movement.
Technical Analysis Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
- Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $59.79
- Middle Bollinger Band: $57.46
- Lower Bollinger Band: $55.14
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (66.36)
- MACD signal: Bullish
- Bollinger Bands position: Overbought
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 468251.05
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 6394025.46
- Volume Rate of Change: 151.65%
News & Sentiment Analysis Recent Headlines Summary: Positive earnings and dividend news, company appointments, and market commentary.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings release, potential sector rotation catalysts.
Market Narrative: News sentiment aligns with the stock's technical momentum, supporting the bullish outlook.
Risk & Volatility Assessment Beta Interpretation:
- Beta: -0.22 (vs SPY)
- Stock moves opposite to market
Volatility Regime:
- Current volatility level: Low
- Historical volatility: 24.4% (HV20), 22.6% (HV30)
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 6.2%
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.00 (Bullish sentiment)
- Options market pricing a $4.88 move by expiration
Downside Protection: Support levels: Upper Bollinger Band, Middle Bollinger Band.
Market Context & Positioning Sector Performance:
- HTO's sector is performing relatively well.
Institutional Activity:
- Volume patterns suggest institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis:
- Stock moves opposite to market (beta).
Relative Valuation:
- Position within trading range: Bullish
Key Levels & Action Items Critical Price Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $59.79
- Middle Bollinger Band: $57.46
- Lower Bollinger Band: $55.14
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Technical levels that could trigger significant moves:
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings release, sector rotation catalysts.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations:
- Stop-loss: 10% below current price (around $54.62)
- Position sizing: 50% of overall portfolio
This comprehensive analysis highlights the bullish technical momentum, positive news sentiment, and low volatility supporting HTO's upward movement. However, it also acknowledges the risks associated with overbought conditions and potential market corrections. Investors should consider these factors when making informed investment decisions.
Generated
News
All HTO news →
Earnings History
5 of 5 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
6.92%
Avg Actual Move
2.26%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-29 | After-Close | 7.16% | 0.45% | 0.06x | Within |
| 2025-10-28 | After-Close | 6.90% | 5.50% | 0.80x | Within |
| 2026-02-25 | After-Close | 4.26% | 2.14% | 0.50x | Within |
| 2026-04-28 | After-Close | 8.18% | 2.68% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2026-07-27 | Pre-Market | 8.11% | 0.53% | 0.07x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
HTO Options Activity & IV Rank
HTO IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 31.6%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $3.72
7-DTE Move: $3.72
Days to Exp: 25 (2026-11-20)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 26
Put Volume: 5
P/C Volume: 0.192
BULLISH
Call OI: 19
Put OI: 8
P/C OI: 0.421
Total OI: 27
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.80
ATM Put: $2.92
Call %: 1.4%
Put %: 5.0%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 98
Chain OI: 222
Last Updated: 10/26/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 50th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
50%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+1.00
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+1.00
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-1.00
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +1.00: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -1.00: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 3 ATM contracts, 0k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 26 · ATM 28.3% / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)66.6MediumOct 26
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$3.72Oct 26
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: -0.2971
Alpha: 20.97%
Correlation: -0.1627
R-Squared: 2.6%
Stock Volatility: 23.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own HTO
6 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $76.2M | #28 of 251 | +2.1% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $6.9M | #880 of 1945 | -69.2% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $3.2M | #1698 of 3138 | -66.3% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $1.6M | #3173 of 6285 | -93.7% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $1.1M | #2861 of 3716 | -94.7% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $38K | #3484 of 4729 | +1.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
HTO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 38,040,215 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
4 filers$1.06M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $692.78K | 65.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $334.24K | 31.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $24.31K | 2.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $6.08K | 0.57% | 2026-06-30 |
2 filers$18.23K notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $12.15K | 66.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $6.08K | 33.33% | 2026-06-30 |
HTO Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 19, 2026Directors 10
- Daniel B. More · since Apr 29, 2015
- Gregory P Landis · since Nov 30, 2016
- Carol P Wallace · since Oct 9, 2019
- Hunt Heather · since Oct 9, 2019
- Mary Ann Hanley · since Oct 9, 2019
- Carl Guardino · since May 19, 2020
- Rebecca A Klein · since Dec 17, 2021
- Denise L Kruger · since Sep 1, 2023
- Andrew F Walters · listed since Jul 2025
- Nick Orlando Rowe · since Mar 1, 2026
Officers 8
- Andrew F Walters · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Jul 2025
- Craig J Patla · President of CTWS · since Jan 1, 2023
- Tanya Moniz-Witten · President, San Jose Water Co. · since Mar 25, 2024
- Bruce A Hauk · President and COO · listed since Jul 2025
- Ann P Kelly · CFO and Treasurer · listed since Jul 2025
- A Kristen Johnson · Chief Administrative Officer · listed since Dec 2019
- Willie D. Brown Jr. · VP & Gen Counsel · listed since Jan 2024
- Megan Mattern · CAO, PAO and Controller · since Jul 28, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (51)
| Aug 19, 2026 | GIP ATLAS Holdings Ltd reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 19, 2026 | ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GIP ATLAS Holdings Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Mar 4, 2026 | ATLAS Infrastructure Partners (UK) Ltd. became a 10% owner |
| Mar 1, 2026 | Nick Orlando Rowe became a director |
| Dec 9, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Eric W Thornburg from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 28, 2025 | Megan Mattern became CAO, PAO and Controller |
| Jul 3, 2025 | Bruce A Hauk listed as President and COO (previously Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jul 3, 2025 | Ann P Kelly listed as CFO and Treasurer (previously Chief Accounting Officer & PAO) in SEC filings |
| Jul 3, 2025 | Andrew F Walters listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously CFO & Treasurer) in SEC filings |
| Jul 3, 2025 | Andrew F Walters first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 26, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Eric W Thornburg as President & CEO in an SEC filing |
| Dec 9, 2024 | Douwe Busschops became Chief Information Officer |
| Nov 12, 2024 | Ann P Kelly became Chief Accounting Officer & PAO |
| May 28, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Mohammed G. Zerhouni as SVP of Fin., Prin. Acct. Ofcr. in an SEC filing |
| Mar 25, 2024 | Tanya Moniz-Witten became President, San Jose Water Co. |
| Jan 4, 2024 | Willie D. Brown Jr. listed as VP & Gen Counsel (previously VP, Gen Counsel, & Corp Sec) in SEC filings |
| Sep 1, 2023 | Denise L Kruger became a director |
| Jun 26, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Andrew Gere as President of SJWC in an SEC filing |
| Feb 1, 2023 | Robert A Van Valer left the board, per their own SEC filing |
| Feb 1, 2023 | Robert A Van Valer is no longer a 10% owner, per their own SEC filing |
| Jan 30, 2023 | Mohammed G. Zerhouni became SVP of Fin., Prin. Acct. Ofcr. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Walter J. Bishop from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 6, 2023 | Andrew Gere listed as President of SJWC (previously President and COO) in SEC filings |
| Jan 5, 2023 | Bruce A Hauk listed as Chief Operating Officer (previously Chf. Crp. Dev. & Str. Offcr.) in SEC filings |
| Jan 1, 2023 | Craig J Patla became President of CTWS |
| Dec 30, 2022 | Maureen P Westbrook reported in an SEC filing no longer being President of CTWS |
| Nov 4, 2022 | James Patrick Lynch reported in an SEC filing no longer being Chief Accounting Officer |
| Aug 22, 2022 | Bruce A Hauk became Chf. Crp. Dev. & Str. Offcr. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | James Patrick Lynch listed as Chief Accounting Officer (previously CFO/Treasurer) in SEC filings |
| Feb 14, 2022 | Robert A Van Valer first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Jan 28, 2022 | Andrew F Walters listed as CFO & Treasurer (previously Chief Corp Development Officer) in SEC filings |
| Dec 17, 2021 | Rebecca A Klein became a director |
| Jun 2, 2021 | Willie D. Brown Jr. first on file as VP, Gen Counsel, & Corp Sec |
| Jan 6, 2021 | Suzy Papazian listed as Sr. Vice Pres. & Gen. Counsel (previously Gen. Counsel & Vice Pres.) in SEC filings |
| May 19, 2020 | Carl Guardino became a director |
| Jan 6, 2020 | Suzy Papazian listed as Gen. Counsel & Vice Pres. (previously Gen. Counsel/Corp. Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Jan 6, 2020 | Andrew F Walters listed as Chief Corp Development Officer (previously Chief Administrative Officer) in SEC filings |
| Dec 4, 2019 | Maureen P Westbrook listed as President of CTWS (previously VP, CS & Reg Aff of CTWS) in SEC filings |
| Dec 4, 2019 | A Kristen Johnson listed as Chief Administrative Officer (previously VP, HR & Corp Sec of CTWS) in SEC filings |
| Oct 9, 2019 | Maureen P Westbrook became VP, CS & Reg Aff of CTWS |
| Oct 9, 2019 | Mary Ann Hanley became a director |
| Oct 9, 2019 | Hunt Heather became a director |
| Oct 9, 2019 | David C Benoit became President of CTWS |
| Oct 9, 2019 | Carol P Wallace became a director |
| Oct 9, 2019 | A Kristen Johnson became VP, HR & Corp Sec of CTWS |
| Jan 4, 2018 | W Richard Roth no longer listed as President & CEO in SEC filings |
| Nov 6, 2017 | Eric W Thornburg became a director |
| Nov 6, 2017 | Eric W Thornburg became President & CEO |
| Aug 14, 2017 | Palle Jensen listed as Executive Vice President (previously Sr. VP of Regulatory Affairs) in SEC filings |
| Nov 30, 2016 | Gregory P Landis became a director |
Not reported recently (11)
- Douwe Busschops · Last reported as Chief Information Officer in an SEC filing dated Jan 6, 2025
- Katharine Armstrong · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 3, 2022
- Wendy Avila-Walker · Last reported as VP of Finance, Controller in an SEC filing dated Jan 6, 2022
- Debra Man · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 30, 2021
- Suzy Papazian · Last reported as Sr. Vice Pres. & Gen. Counsel in an SEC filing dated Feb 26, 2021
- Douglas R King · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 12, 2020
- Palle Jensen · Last reported as Executive Vice President in an SEC filing dated Jan 7, 2020
- David C Benoit · Last reported as President of CTWS in an SEC filing dated Oct 11, 2019
- W Richard Roth · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 1, 2018
- George E Moss · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2018
- Ronald Bruce Moskovitz · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 27, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
HTO Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-11-13
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-13 | Andrew F. Walters | CEO, Director | 2,100 | $98.7K | 2025-11-13 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-07 | Patla Craig J | Officer, President of CTWS | 1,400 | $77.2K | 2024-05-07 | Georgeson Securities Corp | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-03 | Carl Thomas Guardino | Director | 777 | $58.8K | 2023-05-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
121 ETFs hold HTO
25 shown · $632.53M total exposure · 0.09% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.12% | $127.8M | $104.0B | 2026-10-23 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $78.5M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.07% | $52.3M | $74.6B | 2026-10-23 |
| 4 | IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $38.6M | $148.2B | 2026-10-23 |
| 5 | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $32.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $30.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.03% | $25.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | FIW First Trust Water ETF | First Trust | 1.16% | $20.8M | $1.8B | 2026-10-23 |
| 9 | SPSM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.12% | $19.5M | $15.8B | 2026-10-23 |
| 10 | IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $19.5M | $13.9B | 2026-10-23 |
| 11 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $18.0M | — | 2026-10-23 |
| 12 | IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.23% | $17.8M | $7.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 13 | CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | Nport | 1.63% | $17.1M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 14 | VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | Vanguard | 0.15% | $14.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 15 | EDIV State Street® SPDR® S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 1.23% | $14.4M | $1.2B | 2026-10-23 |
| 16 | EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.41% | $14.1M | $3.4B | 2026-10-23 |
| 17 | VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $12.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 18 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.07% | $12.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | SLYV State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Small Cap Value ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.23% | $11.2M | $4.8B | 2026-10-23 |
| 20 | PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | Invesco | 0.54% | $10.9M | — | 2026-10-24 |
| 21 | SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.05% | $10.3M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 22 | SMDV ProShares S&P SmallCap 600 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | ProShares | 1.34% | $9.0M | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 23 | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $8.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 24 | EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.03% | $8.5M | $25.7B | 2026-10-23 |
| 25 | VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | Vanguard | 0.13% | $7.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
20.74
TTM Diluted EPS
$2.82
TTM Revenue
$828.50M
TTM Net Income
$106.95M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$245.23M
Quarterly figures (5 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $210.47M | $26.59M | $0.62 | $60.74M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $183.29M | $19.01M | $0.49 | $43.71M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $194.19M | $16.22M | $0.44 | $63.52M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $240.55M | $45.13M | $1.27 | $77.27M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $198.25M | $24.68M | $0.71 | $60.84M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-07-28
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
20.74
P/B
1.01
P/S
2.69
EV/EBITDA
12.80
EV/Sales
4.83
ROE
4.9%
ROA
2.0%
Div Yield
2.60%
FCF Yield
11.02%
Debt/Equity
0.86
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$2.22B
as of 2026-10-26
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
2.01M
SI % of Float
5.52%
Days to Cover
3.88
Short Vol Ratio
65.7%
Free Float
36.47M
Float %
87.1%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-26 • Float 2026-08-07