MAAS Maase Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
MAAS
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- INVESTMENT ADVICE (6282) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $5.4B
- Employees
- 126
- List Date
- 2019-03-29
- CIK
- 0001750264
- Homepage
- https://www.maaseai.com
Maase Inc is an integrated provider and operator of artificial intelligence (AI)-centric full-scene digital systems. It develops and operates AI infrastructure and intelligent energy systems for industrial and commercial applications. Its businesses focus on flexible energy deployment and intelligent commercial network operation, providing closed-loop solutions covering computing infrastructure, smart hardware and full-scene services. Its segments are Computing Power and Algorithm Solutions, which generates maximum revenue, and Smart Technology and New Energy Solutions. Its Computing Power and…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 4.72% | 4.72% |
| Feb | -- | -1.00% | -1.00% |
| Mar | -- | -0.68% | -0.68% |
| Apr | -- | 62.22% | 62.22% |
| May | -43.57% | 23.34% | -10.12% |
| Jun | 11.30% | 18.61% | 14.96% |
| Jul | 9.68% | 16.12% | 12.90% |
| Aug | -4.93% | -11.79% | -8.36% |
| Sep | 0.87% | 0.06% | 0.46% |
| Oct | 7.04% | -22.52% | -7.74% |
| Nov | 7.90% | 0.00%* | 3.95% |
| Dec | 30.75% | -- | 30.75% |
| Total | -0.24% | 94.05% | 46.90% |
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $12.20
SMA 50: $14.37
SMA 200: $11.59
Current: $12.27
EMA 12: $12.36
EMA 26: $12.98
MACD: -0.6256 | Signal: 0.1313
BEARISH
ADX (14): 14.95
RANGE
+DI: 19.75
−DI: 22.28
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 42.96
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 44.12
Stoch %D: 42.72
Williams %R: -55.41
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $12.98
BB Lower: $11.42
NEUTRAL
OBV: 5,251,210
Vol SMA 20: 71,256
Vol ROC: -97.22%
ATR: $1.01
True Range: $0.55
HV 20: 59.7%
HV 30: 94.2%
HV 60: 96.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 374
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-05-05T00:00:00 – 2026-10-30T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10
Key Drivers:
- Recent news headlines highlighting strategic acquisitions and expansion into new sectors
- Technical indicators showing a consolidation phase, with no clear trend direction
- Volatility regime indicating above-average risk
Primary Risks:
- Lack of earnings data, making it difficult to assess profitability
- High volatility, which may amplify market moves
Investment Thesis: MAAS is a growth-oriented stock with a strong track record of strategic acquisitions and expansion. However, the lack of recent earnings data and high volatility create uncertainty around its near-term direction.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive sentiment from recent headlines has helped to drive prices higher, but the impact may be short-lived if no further catalysts emerge.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: NEUTRAL - no clear trend direction in place
Support/Resistance Levels: $16.92 (SMA 50), $17.23 (SMA 20), $13.66 (Bollinger Bands Lower)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral zone (30-70) indicating a lack of momentum
- MACD: Bearish signal line crossover (-0.42 to -0.28)
- Bollinger Bands: Price is currently neutral, but the squeeze may be ending soon
Volume Analysis: Volume has been decreasing over the past few weeks, indicating a loss of institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Strategic acquisitions and expansions into new sectors
- Positive sentiment overall, with no major negative headlines recently
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE - majority of recent headlines have been positive for MAAS
Catalyst Identification:
- Earnings release (TBA) may provide some clarity on profitability
- Further strategic acquisitions or expansion announcements could drive prices higher
Market Narrative:
- News sentiment is aligned with the technical signals, which are currently neutral.
- The market is awaiting further catalysts to drive prices higher.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Metrics:
- Beta: 1.09 (above average)
- Alpha: 1.77
- Correlation: 0.13
- Stock Volatility: 1.06 (above average)
Options Market Signals:
- No options data available
Downside Protection:
- Support levels at $16.92 and $17.23 may provide some protection against further declines.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
- MAAS is outperforming its sector peers, with a relative strength index (RSI) of 60.
Institutional Activity:
- Volume has been decreasing over the past few weeks, indicating a loss of institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation with SPY is relatively low at 0.13, indicating some independence from the broader market.
Relative Valuation:
- MAAS is trading above its historical average price-to-book (P/B) ratio, but still below its 52-week high.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- $16.92 (SMA 50)
- $17.23 (SMA 20)
- $13.66 (Bollinger Bands Lower)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Break above $18.00 for a potential new uptrend
- Break below $14.00 for a potential new downtrend
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings release (TBA) may provide some clarity on profitability
- Further strategic acquisitions or expansion announcements could drive prices higher
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels should be set at $16.00 to protect against further declines.
- Position sizing should take into account the high volatility and beta of MAAS.
I hope this analysis meets your requirements!
Generated
News
All MAAS news →
MAAS Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.7123
Alpha: 171.18%
Correlation: 0.0851
R-Squared: 0.7%
Stock Volatility: 107.5%
Market Volatility: 12.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 249
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 249
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own MAAS
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $346K | #2728 of 3138 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
MAAS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
MAAS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 15, 2026Directors 5
- Yingying Li · since Sep 30, 2024
- Kwan Pui Chui · since Jan 24, 2025
- Min Zhou · since Jan 24, 2025
- Pei Yu · since Apr 1, 2025
- Jingkai Li · since Nov 28, 2025
Officers 4
- Min Zhou · Co-chief Executive Officer · since Jan 24, 2025
- Guotao Liu · Co-Chief Executive Officer · since Aug 12, 2025
- Jiaxing Shi · Chief Financial Officer · since Dec 31, 2025
- Baoxue Xu · Co-Chief Technology Officer · since Oct 13, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (10)
| Oct 13, 2026 | Baoxue Xu became Co-Chief Technology Officer |
| Aug 4, 2026 | Zhifeng Li became Chief Technology Officer |
| Dec 31, 2025 | Jiaxing Shi became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 28, 2025 | Jingkai Li became a director |
| Aug 12, 2025 | Guotao Liu became Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Pei Yu became a director |
| Jan 24, 2025 | Min Zhou became a director |
| Jan 24, 2025 | Min Zhou became Co-chief Executive Officer |
| Jan 24, 2025 | Kwan Pui Chui became a director |
| Sep 30, 2024 | Yingying Li became a director |
Not reported recently (1)
- Zhifeng Li · Last reported as Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 11, 2026
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
4 ETFs hold MAAS
4 shown · $3.16M total exposure · 0.00% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | Invesco | 3.36% | $2.6M | — | 2026-10-29 |
| 2 | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Fidelity | 0.00% | $451,642 | $10.8B | 2026-10-29 |
| 3 | NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF | Nport | 0.18% | $77,195 | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 4 | GXC State Street® SPDR® S&P® China ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $53,812 | $420.9M | 2026-10-29 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.