GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·1d ago
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd
XNAS
4.14
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
TIGR
$4.14
—
Key stats
$4.14
- 52-Week Range
- $3.61 – $11.35
- YTD
- -60.34%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 40.24
- Straddle Price
- $0.42
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.75
- Market Cap
- $0.7B
- Open
- $3.95
- Day Range
- $3.93 – $4.17
- Volume
- 2,539,819
- Prev Close
- $3.92
Fair Value
MODEL: NEUTRAL
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.88% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.45 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.83% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.96% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +163.0pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Book / Price | 122.7% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $4.38 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $4.00 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 10.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.7B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
Peers used for multiples: ATAT, ATHM, FINV, JOYY, LU, NOAH, PDD, QFIN
60-Day Conviction
29%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 14, 2026
$4.11
α -0.6%
rank 59%
conviction
48%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 12, 2027
$4.18
α +0.9%
rank 59%
conviction
35%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 10, 2027
$4.10
α -1.0%
rank 59%
conviction
29%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $4.38 | 100% | stability 96% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $3.10 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew -0.01 |
As of 2026-11-13 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SECURITY BROKERS, DEALERS & FLOTATION COMPANIES (6211) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.7B
- Employees
- 1,346
- List Date
- 2019-03-20
- CIK
- 0001756699
- Next Earnings
- 2026-12-03
- EPS Forecast
- $0.23
- Homepage
- https://www.itiger.com
UP Fintech Holding Ltd is an online brokerage firm focusing on Chinese investors. Its trading platform enables investors to trade in equities and other financial instruments on multiple exchanges of stocks and other derivatives. The company offers its customers brokerage and value-added services, including trade order placement and execution, margin financing, account management, investor education, community discussion, and customer support.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 82.22% | -11.20% | 26.56% | -9.58% | 5.54% | -18.20% | 12.56% |
| Feb | 27.54% | 1.81% | -13.46% | 6.91% | 8.06% | -7.02% | 3.97% |
| Mar | -30.81% | 8.41% | -10.96% | -20.37% | 24.13% | -19.33% | -8.15% |
| Apr | 21.50% | -21.62% | -12.05% | 2.17% | -4.95% | 2.64% | -2.05% |
| May | 17.23% | 3.03% | 4.84% | 15.96% | -3.80% | -24.08% | 2.20% |
| Jun | 19.70% | 21.39% | -9.55% | 2.19% | 15.29% | -14.89% | 5.69% |
| Jul | -39.05% | -19.40% | 52.58% | -3.32% | 3.93% | 5.38% | 0.02% |
| Aug | -20.80% | 4.72% | 14.72% | -6.43% | 32.98% | 3.70% | 4.81% |
| Sep | -27.61% | -11.80% | -1.73% | 46.30% | -13.39% | -5.94% | -2.36% |
| Oct | -37.91% | 13.15% | -10.24% | 2.09% | 1.75% | -9.37% | -6.75% |
| Nov | -17.03% | 39.52% | -1.77% | -10.65% | -19.16% | 5.88%* | -0.53% |
| Dec | -10.40% | -33.79% | -1.34% | 9.49% | 10.65% | -- | -5.08% |
| Total | -55.78% | -25.24% | 21.70% | 23.19% | 62.59% | -59.86% | -5.57% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $4.00
SMA 50: $4.36
SMA 200: $5.59
Current: $4.14
EMA 12: $3.99
EMA 26: $4.09
MACD: -0.1045 | Signal: 0.0363
BEARISH
ADX (14): 34.72
TREND
+DI: 19.97
−DI: 24.97
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 51.43
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 73.10
Stoch %D: 64.72
Williams %R: -7.02
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $4.22
BB Lower: $3.78
NEUTRAL
OBV: 45,600,627
Vol SMA 20: 1,986,817
Vol ROC: -6.40%
ATR: $0.18
True Range: $0.25
HV 20: 42.6%
HV 30: 47.2%
HV 60: 47.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-15T00:00:00 – 2026-11-13T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD and Stochastic indicators
- Oversold RSI reading, indicating potential for further price decline
- High volatility and beta relative to the market
Primary Risks:
- Continued downward trend in stock price
- Increased uncertainty and risk due to high beta
Investment Thesis: TIGR is likely to experience a prolonged bearish phase due to the accumulation of bearish momentum signals. The stock's high volatility and beta indicate a higher risk profile, making it essential to consider risk management strategies.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no significant market-moving events or announcements that would impact the stock price. However, the overall sentiment remains negative due to the bearish momentum signals.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Downtrend
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Downward trend continuation
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bearish momentum persists
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $6.32 (key resistance level)
- EMA 12: $5.92 (support level)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (21.86) indicating potential for further price decline
- MACD signal: Bearish momentum persists with a histogram value of -0.21
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze and breakout, indicating increased volatility
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 6191242.10 (high volume)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 82310089.63 (increasing OBV supports bearish trend)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The recent news headlines have been neutral, with no significant market-moving events or announcements that would impact the stock price.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification: No immediate catalysts identified. However, upcoming earnings reports could provide a potential catalyst for future price movements.
Market Narrative: The bearish momentum signals are driving the current trend, and any deviations from this trend may be met with increased volatility and market uncertainty.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation:
- Beta: 2.12 (high risk relative to the market)
Volatility Regime:
- Current vs historical volatility levels: High volatility persists
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 92.9% (High) indicating historically high volatility
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 1.02 (Neutral sentiment)
- Put/Call OI Ratio: 0.75 (Bearish sentiment)
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: SMA 20 ($6.32), EMA 12 ($5.92)
- Risk management considerations: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations should be implemented to manage risk.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The sector has been experiencing a downward trend, supporting the bearish momentum in TIGR.
Institutional Activity: High volume and increasing OBV support the bearish trend.
Correlation Analysis: The stock is highly correlated with market movements (0.39), indicating potential for further price declines if the broader market continues to decline.
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within a downward trend, suggesting it may continue to fall before finding support.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $6.32 (key resistance level)
- EMA 12: $5.92 (support level)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above SMA 20 ($6.32) could indicate a trend reversal
- Breakdown below EMA 12 ($5.92) could accelerate the downward trend
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No immediate catalysts identified.
Risk Management:
- Stop-loss levels: Implement stop-loss orders at key support and resistance levels to manage risk.
- Position sizing considerations: Consider reducing position size or hedging strategies to mitigate potential losses.
By considering both technical and fundamental analysis, it is clear that TIGR is experiencing a bearish momentum phase. The accumulation of bearish signals, high volatility, and beta relative to the market indicate a higher risk profile, making it essential to implement risk management strategies.
Generated
News
All TIGR news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·4d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·4d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·4d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8d ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
TIGR Options Activity & IV Rank
TIGR IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 69.2%
7-DTE IV: 81.2%
Expected Move: $0.42
7-DTE Move: $0.36
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-12-11)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 2,777
Put Volume: 2,079
P/C Volume: 0.749
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 91,178
Put OI: 26,115
P/C OI: 0.286
Total OI: 117,293
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.32
ATM Put: $0.11
Call %: 7.6%
Put %: 2.7%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 4,856
Chain OI: 117,293
Last Updated: 11/13/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 38th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
38%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.01
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.15
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.33
δ-decay vs time
Charm tilt -0.33: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 21 ATM contracts, 16k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Put vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Call vs ATM
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsThe same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.
- Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
- Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Reading them together
Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 13 · ATM 73.1% / Put —
30 DTE / 10d put
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Nov 13 · ATM 51.0% / Put —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)30.0MediumNov 13
IV Rank (30 DTE)40.2MediumNov 13
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$0.42Nov 13
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.5575
Alpha: -91.55%
Correlation: 0.3763
R-Squared: 14.2%
Stock Volatility: 56.4%
Market Volatility: 13.6%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own TIGR
5 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $14.6M | #861 of 3138 | +86.3% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $5.8M | #1960 of 3716 | +3574.6% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $5.5M | #954 of 1945 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $2.1M | #2885 of 6285 | +312.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $2K | #4461 of 4729 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
TIGR Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 47 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 2,807,732,382 (as of 2025-12-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
10 filers$13.24M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $5.24M | 39.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $3.81M | 28.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.42M | 18.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $673.64K | 5.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $487.96K | 3.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $269.72K | 2.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Capital LLC | $152.24K | 1.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $105.60K | 0.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Vontobel Holding Ltd. | $68.85K | 0.52% | 2026-09-30 |
| 10 | Leonteq Securities AG | $5.97K | 0.05% | 2026-09-30 |
10 filers$21.92M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $6.81M | 31.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $5.97M | 27.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $3.23M | 14.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $1.77M | 8.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian | $1.76M | 8.03% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.34M | 6.13% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | PEAK6 LLC | $440.44K | 2.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $376.20K | 1.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Capital LLC | $217.36K | 0.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $7.92K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
TIGR Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-29Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-29 | Jian Liu | Director | Sell (S) | −9,333 | $4.60 | -$42.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | Ming Dong | Key Personnel | Award (A) | +80,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-19 | Jian Liu | Director | Award (A) | +399,990 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-09-22 | Nancy M Harvey | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-09-22 | Philip Dean Barrett | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-09-22 | Eric Singer | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-09-22 | Douglas G. Ballinger | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-09-22 | Gerald F Chew | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-08-18 | Justin Trevor Garrity | President | Buy (P) | +1,500 | $0.27 | $405 | EDGAR |
| 2015-03-16 | Eric Singer | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-03-16 | Douglas G. Ballinger | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-03-16 | Nancy M Harvey | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-03-16 | Gerald F Chew | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-03-16 | Philip Dean Barrett | Director | Grant (A) | +10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2015-03-16 | Roger D Rowe | Acting CEO and CFO | Grant (A) | +300,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
TIGR Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $4.14
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ming Dong | Key Personnel | 154,994 | $641.7K | $0 | 1 | 2026-06-29 |
| 2 | Jian Liu | Director | 62,665 | $259.4K | -$42.9K | 2 | 2026-06-29 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
TIGR Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-06-25
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $46K notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Liu Jian (1, $46K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-25 | Liu Jian | Director | 10,000 | $46.4K | 2026-06-25 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-19 | Fang Lei | Director | 1,000,000 | $9.69M | 2025-03-19 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-13 | Dong Ming | Key personnel | 260,000 | $1.53M | 2024-11-13 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-09-30 | Fang Lei | Director | 200,000 | $916.0K | 2024-09-30 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-22 | Dong Ming | Key personnel | 500,000 | $1.91M | 2024-03-22 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-26 | Cheung Vincent | Key personnel | 19,999 | $81.2K | 2023-12-26 | Tiger Fintech (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-12-21 | Dong Ming | Key personnel | 187,000 | $753.6K | 2023-12-21 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-28 | Wu Wei | previous officer | 33,333 | $149.7K | 2023-11-29 | TradeUP Securities, Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-28 | Fang Lei | Director | 900,000 | $4.01M | 2023-11-28 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-09-11 | Dong Ming | Key personnel | 100,000 | $511.0K | 2023-09-11 | Tiger Brokers (NZ) Limited | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
16 ETFs hold TIGR
16 shown · $6.48M total exposure · 0.00% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.00% | $3.9M | $145.5B | 2026-11-12 |
| 2 | SPEM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.00% | $548,746 | $16.4B | 2026-11-12 |
| 3 | EWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.06% | $392,000 | $619.0M | 2026-11-12 |
| 4 | CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | Nport | 0.07% | $324,152 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | Invesco | 0.41% | $314,709 | — | 2026-11-12 |
| 6 | AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $218,195 | $27.3B | 2026-11-12 |
| 7 | APIE ActivePassive International Equity ETF | Nport | 0.02% | $211,413 | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 8 | ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.18% | $106,161 | $56.8M | 2026-11-12 |
| 9 | GINN Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | Goldman | 0.05% | $86,103 | $175.2M | 2026-11-12 |
| 10 | EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.02% | $85,299 | $351.3M | 2026-11-12 |
| 11 | GXC State Street® SPDR® S&P® China ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $60,719 | $431.9M | 2026-11-12 |
| 12 | AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $60,333 | $1.5B | 2026-11-12 |
| 13 | AVEE Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.04% | $59,074 | $135.9M | 2026-11-12 |
| 14 | SPGM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.00% | $44,649 | $1.8B | 2026-11-12 |
| 15 | GMF State Street® SPDR® S&P® Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $36,726 | $382.8M | 2026-11-12 |
| 16 | AVSE Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $517 | $220.2M | 2026-11-12 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (7 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
Q4 2025 • period ending 2025-12-31 • filed 2026-04-24
TIGR vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. American Depositary Sh | $110.4B | — | — | −31.8% | 94 |
| ATAT Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited America | $5.0B | — | — | −4.4% | 67 |
| JOYY JOYY Inc. American Depositary Shares | $3.9B | — | — | +24.6% | 80 |
| ATHM Autohome Inc. American Depositary Shares | $2.5B | — | — | −3.9% | 22 |
| TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd American Deposita | $705M | — | — | −60.3% | 40 |
| FINV FinVolution Group American depositary sh | $642M | — | — | −45.4% | 6 |
| QFIN Qfin Holdings, Inc. American Depositary | $626M | — | — | −72.1% | 27 |
| LU Lufax Holding Ltd. American Depositary S | $570M | — | — | −73.2% | 5 |
| NOAH Noah Holdings Limited American Depositar | $452M | — | — | −38.7% | 45 |
| Peer median | $1.6B | — | — | −35.2% | 36 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
8.61M
SI % of Float
5.00%
Days to Cover
5.13
Short Vol Ratio
49.3%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-10-30 • Short volume 2026-11-13