MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. Class A(MSM)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $78.80 – $128.79
- YTD
- +46.59%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.69
- Straddle Price
- $8.80
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.04
- Market Cap
- $7.1B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.60% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.10% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.97% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +21.8pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 24.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +7.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.07 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.2B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 16.3% |
| Book / Price | 19.9% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 40.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 5.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +17.6% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $115.83 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $122.04 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 8.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $7B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $69.74 | 20% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $71.65 | 16% | |
| Peer P/E | $135.03 | 9% | median 30.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $153.33 | 9% | median 18.1× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $166.96 | 2% | median 6.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $368.37 | 6% | median 4.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $115.83 | 39% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- WHOLESALE-INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (5084)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $7.1B
Founded in 1941, MSC Industrial Direct originally manufactured and sold cutting tools to metalworking shops in New York. Through a series of acquisitions and organic expansions, MSC has grown into an industrial distribution powerhouse with a focus on specialized metalworking products and services. The firm also distributes a wide breadth of maintenance, repair, and operations supplies. MSC primarily operates in North America, where it derives over 95% of its revenue.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.71% | 23 |
| Feb | +0.66% | 23 |
| Mar | +2.49% | 23 |
| Apr | +1.81% | 23 |
| May | +0.89% | 23 |
| Jun | -0.78% | 23 |
| Jul | +0.00% | 23 |
| Aug | -2.14% | 22 |
| Sep | +0.33% | 23 |
| Oct | +1.81% | 23 |
| Nov | +3.35% | 23 |
| Dec | +0.70% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | Pre-Market | 8.60% | 3.77% | 0.44x | Within |
| 2025-01-08 | Pre-Market | 7.03% | 3.75% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2025-04-03 | Pre-Market | 9.31% | 0.00% | 0.00x | Within |
| 2025-07-01 | Pre-Market | 6.03% | 4.54% | 0.75x | Within |
| 2025-10-23 | Pre-Market | 8.21% | 1.10% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2026-01-07 | Pre-Market | 5.59% | 5.05% | 0.90x | Within |
| 2026-04-01 | Pre-Market | 7.99% | 0.78% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2026-07-01 | Pre-Market | 6.83% | 4.28% | 0.63x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.69
- IV Rank (7D)
- 8.69
- Avg IV
- 44.7%
- Straddle (30D)
- $8.80
- Straddle (7D)
- $8.80
- P/C Volume
- 1.04
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.68
- Correlation (SPY)
- 32.4%
- R²
- 0.11
- Ann. Volatility
- 26.5%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.42M | 45.49% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $673.57K | 21.56% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $562.85K | 18.02% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $263.44K | 8.43% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $202.99K | 6.50% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SCOPUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. | $2.77M | 46.99% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $719.71K | 12.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $645.89K | 10.96% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $479.80K | 8.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | Total Wealth Planning & Management, Inc. | $424.44K | 7.21% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $387.53K | 6.58% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $354.28K | 6.01% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $110.72K | 1.88% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | Walter Siegel | SVP, Gen Counsel & Corp Sec | Grant (A) | +2,013 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-09 | MITCHELL JACOBSON | Director | Gift (G) | −14,972 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-05 | STEVEN PALADINO | Director | Gift (G) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-02 | Rudina Seseri | Director | Sell (S) | −1,800 | $86.83 | -$156.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-27 | STEVEN PALADINO | Director | Exer (M) | +745 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-27 | ERIK GERSHWIND | Director | Mixed | −114,237 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-27 | MITCHELL JACOBSON | Director | Grant (A) | +1,603 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | Rahquel Purcell | Director | Exer (M) | +823 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | STEVEN PALADINO | Director | Exer (M) | +823 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | Robert B Aarnes | Director | Exer (M) | +823 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | Michael C Kaufmann | Director | Exer (M) | +745 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | Robert B Aarnes | Director | Grant (A) | +1,603 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | Rudina Seseri | Director | Exer (M) | +745 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | PHILIP PELLER | Director | Grant (A) | +1,603 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-26 | LOUISE K GOESER | Director | Grant (A) | +1,603 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MITCHELL JACOBSON | Director | 5,206,807 | $655.17M | -$292.71M | 114 | 2026-04-09 |
| 2 | STEPHEN F JR MANDEL | 10%+ Owner | 4,823,117 | $606.89M | -$2.40M | 5 | 2009-01-07 |
| 3 | LONE PINE CAPITAL LLC | 10%+ Owner | 4,333,217 | $545.25M | -$83.73M | 2 | 2009-01-15 |
| 4 | ERIK GERSHWIND | Chief Executive Officer | 1,639,359 | $206.28M | -$66.71M | 152 | 2026-01-27 |
| 5 | Stacey L. Bennett | 10%+ Owner | 1,359,346 | $171.05M | $0 | 1 | 2023-10-05 |
| 6 | MARJORIE GERSHWIND | 10%+ Owner | 901,326 | $113.41M | $0 | 1 | 2023-10-05 |
| 7 | DAVID SANDLER | Executive Vice Chairman | 106,385 | $13.39M | -$55.90M | 76 | 2016-09-20 |
| 8 | CHARLES A JR BOEHLKE | EXECUTIVE VP AND CFO | 42,827 | $5.39M | -$14.18M | 29 | 2011-01-18 |
| 9 | Eileen McGuire | EVP of Human Resources | 39,268 | $4.94M | -$13.58M | 44 | 2014-01-21 |
| 10 | ROGER FRADIN | Director | 38,303 | $4.82M | -$1.92M | 33 | 2020-01-31 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-02 | RUDINA SESERI | Director | 1,800 | $156.3K | 2026-02-02 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-10 | KIMBERLY A SHACKLETT | Officer | 2,130 | $193.2K | 2025-07-10 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-09 | KIMBERLY SHACKLETT | Officer | 2,129 | $193.2K | 2025-07-09 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-03 | THE PHILIP R PELLER REVOCABLE TRUST | Director | 2,000 | $180.0K | 2025-07-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-03 | GERSHWIND ERIK | Director, Officer | 2,000 | $179.2K | 2025-07-03 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-13 | THE PHILIP R PELLER REVOCABLE TRUST | Director | 900 | $80.2K | 2024-11-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-12 | GERSHWIND ERIK | Director, Officer | 100,000 | $8.91M | 2024-11-11 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-17 | Shacklett Kimberly | Officer | 4,885 | $413.3K | 2024-07-17 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-31 | JACOBSON MITCHELL | Director, 10% Owner | 25,000 | $240.0K | 2024-01-31 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-22 | JACOBSON MITCHELL | Director, 10% Owner | 250,000 | $24.11M | 2024-01-22 | UBS Financial Services Inc | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-15 | 0001003078-26-000064 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-01 | 0001003078-26-000059 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-19 | 0001003078-26-000055 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-02 | 0001003078-26-000050 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-21 | 0001003078-26-000017 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-07 | 0001003078-26-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-05 | 0001003078-26-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-18 | 0001003078-25-000187 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-12 | 0001003078-25-000181 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-23 | 0001003078-25-000121 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-23 | 0001003078-25-000123 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-24 | 0001003078-24-000107 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-25 | 0001003078-23-000102 | EDGAR |
| 2022-10-20 | 0001003078-22-000127 | EDGAR |
| 2021-10-20 | 0001003078-21-000199 | EDGAR |
| 2020-10-27 | 0001003078-20-000283 | EDGAR |
| 2019-10-24 | 0001003078-19-000232 | EDGAR |
| 2018-10-30 | 0001003078-18-000281 | EDGAR |
| 2017-10-31 | 0001003078-17-000307 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | 0001003078-26-000061 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-07 | 0001003078-26-000012 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-01 | 0001003078-25-000075 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-03 | 0001003078-25-000047 | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-08 | 0001003078-25-000007 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-02 | 0001003078-24-000076 | EDGAR |
| 2024-03-28 | 0001003078-24-000050 | EDGAR |
| 2024-01-09 | 0001003078-24-000008 | EDGAR |
| 2023-06-29 | 0001003078-23-000072 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-04 | 0001003078-23-000050 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 30.3 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.0 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.0 |
| TTM Revenue | $3.9B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.2B |
| TTM EPS | $4.15 |
| ROE | 16.3% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.36 |