NOMD Nomad Foods Limited
XNYS
12.02
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
NOMD
$12.02
—
Key stats
$12.02
- 52-Week Range
- $8.99 – $13.08
- YTD
- -1.17%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 9.6
- Straddle Price
- $1.02
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 2.27
- Market Cap
- $1.6B
- Open
- $12.01
- Day Range
- $11.72 – $12.06
- Volume
- 484,529
- Prev Close
- $11.75
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.57 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 7.74% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 5.33% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +81.3pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Book / Price | 166.0% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.90 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $11.34 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $11.87 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 10.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $2.3B |
| Market Cap | $2B |
Peers used for multiples: ADM, COKE, KDP, KO, KR, MNST, SAM, WMK
60-Day Conviction
82%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$11.96
α -0.7%
rank 91%
conviction
51%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$11.94
α -0.9%
rank 91%
conviction
34%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$11.56
α -4.1%
rank 91%
conviction
82%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $18.49 | 26% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 28.1× · 7 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 12.5× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $60.46 | 10% | median 3.1× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 1.5× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $11.34 | 64% | stability 97% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $12.73 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew +0.83 |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS (2000) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $1.6B
- Employees
- 7,752
- List Date
- 2014-09-09
- CIK
- 0001651717
- Homepage
- https://www.nomadfoods.com
Nomad Foods Ltd is a packaged foods company that is involved in the business of manufacturing and distributing branded frozen foods in Western Europe. The company manufactures and markets frozen food products such as fish, vegetables, poultry, Ice Cream, and ready meals like pizza. It sells its products through large grocery retailers under the brand Birds Eye in the United Kingdom and Ireland, Findus in Italy, France, Spain, and Iglo in Germany and other continental markets. The company operates through a single segment being Frozen. The majority of the revenue is generated from the United Ki…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.18% | -0.54% | 1.08% | 4.23% | 7.20% | 4.44% | 2.54% |
| Feb | -7.04% | -3.67% | -0.44% | -0.75% | 6.30% | -12.87% | -3.08% |
| Mar | 13.61% | -9.57% | 6.84% | 0.31% | -0.96% | -10.10% | 0.02% |
| Apr | 4.44% | -20.47% | -0.79% | -7.90% | 1.73% | 1.57% | -3.57% |
| May | 5.14% | 12.93% | -10.73% | -2.61% | -11.21% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
| Jun | -9.01% | -3.10% | 0.81% | -6.26% | -2.07% | 7.25% | -2.06% |
| Jul | -7.67% | -8.80% | 1.14% | 16.38% | -3.16% | 6.01% | 0.65% |
| Aug | 0.50% | -4.74% | 3.15% | 0.27% | -8.43% | -3.40% | -2.11% |
| Sep | 2.64% | -19.23% | -14.45% | 0.21% | -14.50% | -11.48% | -9.47% |
| Oct | -3.81% | 7.92% | -6.50% | -5.49% | -15.48% | 11.29% | -2.01% |
| Nov | -12.59% | 13.57% | 16.10% | 3.86% | 9.20% | -2.55%* | 4.60% |
| Dec | 6.41% | -0.86% | 4.31% | -6.36% | 2.04% | -- | 1.11% |
| Total | -11.14% | -35.71% | -2.99% | -6.22% | -28.72% | -6.69% | -15.24% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $11.91
SMA 50: $11.35
SMA 200: $10.99
Current: $12.05
EMA 12: $11.99
EMA 26: $11.77
MACD: 0.2262 | Signal: -0.0182
BULLISH
ADX (14): 37.98
TREND
+DI: 33.00
−DI: 19.37
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 55.49
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 34.14
Stoch %D: 53.24
Williams %R: -55.28
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $12.49
BB Lower: $11.32
NEUTRAL
OBV: -25,203,803
Vol SMA 20: 1,122,207
Vol ROC: -42.89%
ATR: $0.32
True Range: $0.34
HV 20: 32.5%
HV 30: 31.9%
HV 60: 29.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report - NOMD
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bullish momentum signals from MACD and EMA indicators
- Neutral sentiment from recent news headlines and options activity
- Low volatility and correlation with market indices
Primary Risks:
- Bearish trend signals from ADX and -DI indicators
- Potential for mean reversion from Bollinger Bands and RSI levels
Investment Thesis:
NOMD is a defensive play in the food industry, benefiting from low volatility and stable fundamentals. The stock's recent price movement is largely driven by technical momentum indicators, while news sentiment remains neutral. We expect NOMD to continue trading within its current range, with potential for mean reversion.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent news headlines are generally positive, highlighting the company's dividend payments and market trends in the ready meals sector. However, the overall sentiment is neutral, as there are no significant events or catalysts driving the stock price.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: NEUTRAL, Medium-term: BULLISH, Long-term: DEFENSIVE
Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels to monitor:
- Lower band: $11.24
- Middle line: $11.72
- Upper band: $12.20
- Trend support: SMA 200 ($11.19)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 48.58 (neutral)
- MACD signal: Bullish momentum, above signal line
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral, with no clear squeeze or breakout signals
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines on dividend payments and market trends.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment from recent news headlines (5/6 positive).
Catalyst Identification: No significant events or catalysts driving the stock price.
Market Narrative: NOMD's price movement is driven by technical momentum indicators, while news sentiment remains neutral. The market narrative highlights the company's defensive position in the food industry.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta = 0.02).
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is low (Historical Volatility: HV20 38.8%, HV30 38.1%, HV60 33.7%).
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: Medium (42.9%), Options market pricing $1.12 move by expiration.
Downside Protection: Support levels: Lower band ($11.24), Middle line ($11.72).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Food industry sector performance is stable, with no significant trends or catalysts driving the stock price.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, with a balanced mix of buying and selling pressure.
Correlation Analysis: NOMD's correlation with market indices (R-squared) is low (0.01).
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, with no clear trend or catalyst driving the stock price.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support levels: Lower band ($11.24), Middle line ($11.72). Resistance levels: Upper band ($12.20).
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear breakout or breakdown signals from technical indicators.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No significant events or catalysts driving the stock price in the near term.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations:
- Lower band: $11.24 (stop-loss)
- Middle line: $11.72 (position sizing)
Note: The analysis is based on the provided data, and any additional information or market events may affect the conclusions drawn here.
Generated
News
All NOMD news →
Retailer restocking after cyberattacks turned temporary outages into a sales boost, while closing a factory targets overhead rather than shelf prices.
Organic revenue grew again, but fish inflation weighs on the fourth quarter.
NOMD Options Activity & IV Rank
NOMD IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 31.4%
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $1.02
7-DTE Move: $0.75
Days to Exp: 39 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 194
Put Volume: 440
P/C Volume: 2.268
BEARISH
Call OI: 6,997
Put OI: 2,224
P/C OI: 0.318
Total OI: 9,221
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.35
ATM Put: $0.68
Call %: 2.9%
Put %: 5.6%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 634
Chain OI: 9,221
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 69th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
69%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.63
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.65
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.52
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.65: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.52: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 6 ATM contracts, 4k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)9.6LowNov 9
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$1.02Nov 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.1035
Alpha: 3.28%
Correlation: 0.0441
R-Squared: 0.2%
Stock Volatility: 32.4%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own NOMD
5 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $28.1M | #560 of 3138 | -15.1% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $4.9M | #2103 of 6285 | +94.1% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $4.4M | #1017 of 1945 | +353.2% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $829K | #2981 of 3716 | -70.2% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $6K | #4201 of 4729 | -70.2% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
NOMD Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 64 already for 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 150,197,828 (as of 2025-12-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
5 filers$3.04M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.49M | 49.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $762.12K | 25.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $538.74K | 17.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $172.51K | 5.67% | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $76.65K | 2.52% | 2026-06-30 |
6 filers$2.81M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.17M | 41.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $867.24K | 30.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $547.50K | 19.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Walleye Capital LLC | $142.35K | 5.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $41.61K | 1.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $37.19K | 1.32% | 2026-09-30 |
NOMD Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-11-04Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | Dominic Brisby | Chief Executive Officer | Tax (F) | −70,500 | $12.36 | -$871.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Dominic Brisby | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +50,000 | $12.38 | $619.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Ruben Baldew | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +28,290 | $11.85 | $335.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | Victoria Parry | Director | Tax (F) | −4,021 | $10.02 | -$40.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | Melanie Dawn Stack | Director | Tax (F) | −4,021 | $10.02 | -$40.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | Amit Pilowsky | Director | Tax (F) | −3,729 | $10.02 | -$37.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | James E Lillie | Director | Tax (F) | −3,580 | $10.02 | -$35.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-06 | Carey J. Dorman | Director | Tax (F) | −1,676 | $10.02 | -$16.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | Victoria Parry | Director | Award (A) | +13,972 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-24 | Carey J. Dorman | Director | Award (A) | +22,654 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-24 | James E Lillie | Director | Award (A) | +13,972 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-24 | Amit Pilowsky | Director | Award (A) | +21,656 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-24 | Melanie Dawn Stack | Director | Award (A) | +21,856 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-18 | Ruben Baldew | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +14,731 | $9.71 | $143.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Dominic Brisby | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +150,000 | $9.79 | $1.47M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
NOMD Insider Holdings
10 insiders · @ $12.05
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Noam Gottesman | Director | 11,280,101 | $135.93M | $6.63M | 2 | 2026-05-13 |
| 2 | James E Lillie | Director | 745,636 | $8.98M | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-06 |
| 3 | Dominic Brisby | Chief Executive Officer | 656,294 | $7.91M | $2.09M | 4 | 2026-11-04 |
| 4 | Ruben Baldew | Chief Financial Officer | 367,172 | $4.42M | $478.3K | 3 | 2026-08-21 |
| 5 | Ian G H Ashken | Director | 125,098 | $1.51M | $912.7K | 1 | 2026-05-15 |
| 6 | Martin E Franklin | Director | 112,500 | $1.36M | $0 | 1 | 2026-05-08 |
| 7 | Victoria Parry | Director | 48,341 | $582.5K | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-06 |
| 8 | Melanie Dawn Stack | Director | 39,396 | $474.7K | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-06 |
| 9 | Amit Pilowsky | Director | 35,464 | $427.3K | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-06 |
| 10 | Carey J. Dorman | Director | 29,356 | $353.7K | $0 | 2 | 2026-07-06 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
NOMD Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 4, 2026Directors 12
- Amit Pilowsky · since Mar 17, 2026
- Carey J. Dorman · since Mar 17, 2026
- Dominic Brisby · since Mar 17, 2026
- Ian G H Ashken · since Mar 17, 2026
- James E Lillie · since Mar 17, 2026
- Martin E Franklin · since Mar 17, 2026
- Melanie Dawn Stack · since Mar 17, 2026
- Noam Gottesman · since Mar 17, 2026
- Ruben Baldew · since Mar 17, 2026
- Stefan Descheemaeker · since Mar 17, 2026
- Stuart M Macfarlane · since Mar 17, 2026
- Victoria Parry · since Mar 17, 2026
Officers 2
- Dominic Brisby · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 17, 2026
- Ruben Baldew · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 17, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (14)
| Mar 17, 2026 | Victoria Parry became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Stuart M Macfarlane became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Stefan Descheemaeker became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Ruben Baldew became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Ruben Baldew became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Noam Gottesman became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Melanie Dawn Stack became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Martin E Franklin became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | James E Lillie became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Ian G H Ashken became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Dominic Brisby became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Dominic Brisby became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Carey J. Dorman became a director |
| Mar 17, 2026 | Amit Pilowsky became a director |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
10 ETFs hold NOMD
10 shown · $21.62M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BAFE Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF | Nport | 0.48% | $8.1M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | Vanguard | 0.01% | $4.9M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | PBJ Invesco Food & Beverage ETF | Invesco | 2.77% | $3.0M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 4 | SPDW State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.01% | $2.1M | $41.0B | 2026-11-05 |
| 5 | PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | Invesco | 0.01% | $1.2M | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 6 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $845,335 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | GWX State Street® SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.07% | $638,143 | $896.1M | 2026-11-05 |
| 8 | FORH Formidable ETF | Nport | 2.44% | $481,548 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $315,465 | — | 2026-11-05 |
| 10 | MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | PIMCO | 0.01% | $33,969 | $307.5M | 2026-11-06 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
Quarterly figures (10 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '21 | 2021-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '20 | 2020-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '19 | 2019-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '18 | 2018-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '17 | 2017-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
| Q4 '16 | 2016-12-31 | — | — | — | — |
Q4 2025 • period ending 2025-12-31 • filed 2026-02-26
NOMD vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO Coca-Cola Company | $411.6B | 28.2 | +7.1% | +38.5% | 44 |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | $89.5B | 21.9 | +18.1% | +19.1% | 36 |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | $49.9B | 37.2 | +27.5% | +32.7% | 35 |
| KR The Kroger Co. | $40.0B | 36.8 | +1.6% | +7.5% | 62 |
| ADM Archer Daniels Midland Company | $33.3B | 13.7 | +1.0% | +18.7% | 31 |
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. Common Stoc | $13.8B | 27.3 | +10.7% | +36.8% | 24 |
| SAM Boston Beer Company | $2.2B | — | −3.3% | +9.7% | 18 |
| WMK Weis Markets, Inc. | $1.9B | 19.2 | +4.3% | +22.9% | 8 |
| NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | $1.6B | — | — | −0.9% | 10 |
| Peer median | $36.6B | 27.3 | +5.7% | +21.0% | 33 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
2.78M
SI % of Float
2.47%
Days to Cover
1.84
Short Vol Ratio
39.4%
Free Float
112.38M
Float %
80.4%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06 • Float 2026-08-14