BenzingaT3·23mo ago
OPI Office Properties Income Trust Common shares of beneficial interest
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
OPI
—
—
Key stats
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.96% |
| WACC | 6.55% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -7.7% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -55.0% |
| Book / Price | 124.2% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 94.1% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -18.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 2.37 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $16.24 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $14.43 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 246.8% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $2.3B |
| Market Cap | $1B |
Peers used for multiples: CBRE, CURB, CWK, EFC, GTY, KW, MRP, TRNO, UE
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$30.30
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 25.7× · 9 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $36.40 | 28% | median 20.4× · 9 peers |
| Peer P/B | $22.12 | 36% | median 1.5× · 9 peers |
| Peer P/S | $33.79 | 36% | median 4.9× · 9 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $16.24 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-27 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- REAL ESTATE (6500) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- List Date
- 2026-06-18
- CIK
- 0001456772
- Headquarters
- Newton, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.opireit.com
Office Properties Income Trust is a real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on owning and leasing office properties to high-credit-quality tenants in markets throughout the United States. The U.S. government leases the maximum portion of the company's properties.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 3.26% | -1.74% | 19.83% | -48.46% | -8.80% | -- | -7.18% |
| Feb | 5.37% | -1.57% | -3.80% | -27.45% | -2.96% | -- | -6.08% |
| Mar | 5.68% | 4.51% | -26.17% | -17.41% | -49.56% | 0.00% | -13.83% |
| Apr | -0.11% | -17.42% | -46.99% | 2.54% | -9.35% | -- | -14.27% |
| May | 4.24% | 2.50% | 16.77% | 14.50% | -43.90% | -- | -1.18% |
| Jun | -1.91% | -4.77% | 9.22% | -10.92% | 30.34% | 0.00% | 3.66% |
| Jul | -1.96% | 1.76% | -2.16% | 32.45% | -9.06% | 15.24% | 6.05% |
| Aug | -6.12% | -14.63% | 0.68% | -17.60% | -5.87% | -8.30% | -8.64% |
| Sep | -4.70% | -18.65% | -44.07% | 2.35% | 55.14% | -10.00% | -3.32% |
| Oct | -1.23% | 9.44% | 12.53% | -24.64% | -33.04% | -21.16%* | -9.68% |
| Nov | -9.50% | -0.26% | 24.83% | 10.00% | -- | -- | 6.27% |
| Dec | 7.39% | -10.76% | 16.75% | -37.51% | -- | -- | -6.03% |
| Total | -1.12% | -43.91% | -48.01% | -81.31% | -73.69% | -25.02% | -45.51% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $14.43
SMA 50: $16.24
SMA 200: $7.71
Current: $12.11
EMA 12: $13.52
EMA 26: $14.61
MACD: -1.0940 | Signal: -0.1943
BEARISH
ADX (14): 23.55
WEAK TREND
+DI: 11.45
−DI: 28.61
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 30.17
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 2.86
Stoch %D: 9.76
Williams %R: -92.31
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $17.00
BB Lower: $11.86
NEUTRAL
OBV: 251,705,895
Vol SMA 20: 78,614
Vol ROC: 326.01%
ATR: $0.94
True Range: $0.76
HV 20: 66.2%
HV 30: 62.9%
HV 60: 50.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-03-01T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: OPI
Executive Summary
Confidence Level: 7/10 (BULLISH) Key Drivers: Debt refinancing plan, positive news sentiment, technical support Primary Risks: Volatility, beta signal, potential earnings miss Investment Thesis: OPI presents a compelling opportunity for long-term investors due to its debt refinancing plan and supportive technical indicators. Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive news headlines contributed to the stock's recent price increase.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Uptrend
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral trend
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish trend
Support/Resistance Levels: $16.00 (lower Bollinger Band), $17.31 (SMA 20), $18.02 (SMA 50)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral zone (30-70)
- MACD signal: Bearish crossover
- Bollinger Bands position: Mean reversion
Volume Analysis: Volume trend is upward, institutional interest signals are moderate.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Debt refinancing plan, earnings reports, and sector analysis headlines.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive news sentiment (positive headlines outweigh negative ones).
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings release.
Market Narrative: Technical signals align with positive news sentiment, suggesting a strong uptrend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Negative beta indicates the stock moves opposite to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support level at $16.00 (lower Bollinger Band).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: OPI outperformed its sector in the recent period.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is moderate, with a slight increase in volume trend.
Correlation Analysis: Stock moves relatively independently of the market (R-squared interpretation: 0.2).
Relative Valuation: Position within a trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: $16.00 (lower Bollinger Band), $17.31 (SMA 20)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: $18.02 (SMA 50) and $18.63 (upper Bollinger Band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings release.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at $16.00 and position sizing considerations.
Please let me know if you would like me to clarify or expand on any of the analysis points.
Generated
News
All OPI news →
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·30mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·30mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·30mo ago
Seeking AlphaT3·30mo ago
BenzingaT3·30mo ago
BenzingaT3·31mo ago
BenzingaT3·32mo ago
BenzingaT3·32mo ago
Seeking AlphaT3·32mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
OPI Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 73rd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
73%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.32
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.17
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.11
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 3 ATM contracts, 7k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Mar 18 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Mar 18 · No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: -37.5641
Alpha: 15881.09%
Correlation: -0.0434
R-Squared: 0.2%
Stock Volatility: 9934.7%
Market Volatility: 11.5%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 99
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 99
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own OPI
4 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $2.0M | #2572 of 3716 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $217K | #5408 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Oaktree Capital Asset manager Howard Marks | $184K | #130 of 130 | new | 13F | |
| MSD Partners / MSD Capital Family office Michael Dell | $182K | #8 of 9 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
OPI Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 66,456,250 (as of 2025-09-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
OPI Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-19Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-19 | Ruben Kliksberg | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −785,680 | $19.03 | -$14.95M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-13 | Ruben Kliksberg | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −27,420 | $19.01 | -$521.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Double Twins K, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −649,016 | $19.71 | -$12.79M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Redwood Capital Management Holdings, LP | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −649,016 | $19.71 | -$12.79M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Double Twins K, LLC | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −649,016 | $19.71 | -$12.79M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Ruben Kliksberg | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −649,016 | $19.71 | -$12.79M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
OPI Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $12.11
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Double Twins K, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 4,165,267 | $50.44M | -$25.58M | 2 | 2026-08-07 |
| 2 | Redwood Capital Management Holdings, LP | 10%+ Owner | 4,165,267 | $50.44M | -$12.79M | 1 | 2026-08-07 |
| 3 | Ruben Kliksberg | 10%+ Owner | 3,961,992 | $47.98M | -$28.27M | 3 | 2026-08-19 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
OPI Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 19, 2026Directors 5
- William A. Lamkin · since Jan 15, 2019
- Jennifer B Clark · since Jun 17, 2021
- Irvin Schlussel · since Jun 17, 2026
- Jonathan Kolatch · since Jun 17, 2026
- Jonathan M Heller · since Jun 17, 2026
Officers 1
- Brian E. Donley · CFO and Treasurer · since Oct 1, 2023
10% owners 8
- Double Twins K, LLC (entity) · since Jun 17, 2026
- Helix Partners Management LP (entity) · since Jun 17, 2026
- Helix Strategic Fund II LLC (entity) · since Jun 17, 2026
- Helix Strategic Fund LP (entity) · since Jun 17, 2026
- Jonathan M Heller · since Jun 17, 2026
- Redwood Capital Management Holdings, LP (entity) · since Jun 17, 2026
- Redwood Capital Management, LLC (entity) · since Jun 17, 2026
- Ruben Kliksberg · since Jun 17, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (33)
| Jun 17, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Yael Duffy as President and COO in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Timothy R Pohl from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Adam D. Portnoy from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Adam D. Portnoy as President in an SEC filing |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Ruben Kliksberg became a 10% owner |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Redwood Capital Management, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Redwood Capital Management Holdings, LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Jonathan M Heller became a director |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Jonathan M Heller became a 10% owner |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Jonathan Kolatch became a director |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Irvin Schlussel became a director |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Helix Strategic Fund LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Helix Strategic Fund II LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Helix Partners Management LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 17, 2026 | Double Twins K, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jun 11, 2025 | Timothy R Pohl became a director |
| Jan 1, 2024 | Yael Duffy became President and COO |
| Nov 17, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Christopher J. Bilotto as President and COO in an SEC filing |
| Oct 1, 2023 | Brian E. Donley became CFO and Treasurer |
| Sep 26, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Matthew C. Brown as CFO and Treasurer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 12, 2022 | Mark A. Talley became a director |
| Sep 17, 2021 | Christopher J. Bilotto listed as President and COO (previously Vice President and COO) in SEC filings |
| Jun 17, 2021 | Jennifer B Clark became a director |
| Sep 21, 2020 | Christopher J. Bilotto listed as Vice President and COO (previously Vice President) in SEC filings |
| Mar 2, 2020 | Christopher J. Bilotto became Vice President |
| Jun 1, 2019 | Matthew C. Brown became CFO and Treasurer |
| Jan 15, 2019 | William A. Lamkin became a director |
| Jan 15, 2019 | Donna D. Fraiche became a director |
| Jan 2, 2019 | David M. Blackman first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jan 1, 2019 | Jeffrey C. Leer became CFO and Treasurer |
| Sep 17, 2018 | David M. Blackman listed as President and CEO (previously President and COO) in SEC filings |
| Apr 4, 2018 | Mark L. Kleifges first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Feb 21, 2017 | Elena Poptodorova became a director |
Not reported recently (10)
- Jeffrey P. Somers · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 17, 2024
- John L. Harrington · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 17, 2024
- Barbara D. Gilmore · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 17, 2024
- Elena Poptodorova · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 17, 2024
- Donna D. Fraiche · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 17, 2024
- Mark A. Talley · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 17, 2024
- David M. Blackman · Last reported as President and CEO in an SEC filing dated Sep 23, 2020
- Mark L. Kleifges · Last reported as CFO and Treasurer in an SEC filing dated Jan 2, 2019
- Jeffrey C. Leer · Last reported as CFO and Treasurer in an SEC filing dated Jan 2, 2019
- Barry M. Portnoy · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 18, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
OPI Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-08-06
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
1 filing
· $19.7M notice value
· 1 unique filer
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
Redwood Capital Management, LLC (1) (1, $19.7M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | Redwood Capital Management, LLC (1) | May be deemed affiliate | 1,000,000 | $19.71M | 2026-08-06 | BTIG, LLC | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
2 ETFs hold OPI
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-5.02
TTM Revenue
$455.48M
TTM Net Income
$-302.07M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$17.36M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $109.13M | $-66.34M | $-0.90 | $-12.18M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $114.50M | $-41.19M | $-0.58 | $32.40M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $113.61M | $-45.87M | $-0.66 | $-28.59M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $118.24M | $-148.68M | $-2.88 | $25.73M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $120.62M | $-58.41M | $-1.14 | $-17.06M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $123.69M | $76.17M | $1.56 | $31.87M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $139.44M | $-5.18M | $-0.11 | $26.63M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $133.77M | $-37.15M | $-0.77 | $32.59M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $133.36M | $-19.59M | $-0.41 | $20.91M |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $134.00M | $-12.24M | $-0.25 | $33.49M |
| Q1 '23 | 2023-03-31 | $132.42M | $-446.00K | $-0.01 | $54.74M |
| Q4 '22 | 2022-12-31 | $127.92M | $6.39M | $0.13 | $39.93M |
Q3 2025 • period ending 2025-09-30 • filed 2026-05-22
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
0.80
P/S
1.77
EV/EBITDA
13.43
EV/Sales
6.87
ROE
-30.2%
ROA
-8.6%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
2.16%
Debt/Equity
2.37
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$804.79M
as of 2026-10-26
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
312.99K
SI % of Float
1.48%
Days to Cover
2.48
Short Vol Ratio
79.0%
Free Float
21.13M
Float %
96.3%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-26 • Float 2026-09-03