GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2mo ago
QUCY Quantum Cyber N.V. Ordinary Shares
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
QUCY
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 13
- List Date
- 2021-11-05
- CIK
- 0001874252
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.08) (2 est.)
- Headquarters
- Mainz
- Homepage
- http://quantum-cyber.ai
Quantum Cyber NV is focused on building a diversified platform at the intersection of quantum computing and cybersecurity. It aims to secure critical infrastructure and data against these emerging threats.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -- |
| Feb | -- | -- |
| Mar | -37.53% | -37.53% |
| Apr | -10.59% | -10.59% |
| May | 523.48% | 523.48% |
| Jun | -29.60% | -29.60% |
| Jul | -25.00% | -25.00% |
| Aug | 24.60% | 24.60% |
| Sep | -11.49% | -11.49% |
| Oct | -36.93%* | -36.93% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | 27.89% | 27.89% |
* Only 1 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.17
SMA 50: $1.31
SMA 200: —
Current: $0.85
EMA 12: $1.06
EMA 26: $1.17
MACD: -0.1043 | Signal: -0.0250
BEARISH
ADX (14): 32.45
TREND
+DI: 8.81
−DI: 36.03
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 28.64
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 12.82
Stoch %D: 18.35
Williams %R: -99.86
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.50
BB Lower: $0.84
NEUTRAL
OBV: 942,365,708
Vol SMA 20: 529,176
Vol ROC: -70.74%
ATR: $0.10
True Range: $0.16
HV 20: 131.6%
HV 30: 110.9%
HV 60: 104.7%
Data Summary
Data Points: 158
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2026-03-12T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for QUCY:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BULLISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key Drivers: Positive news headlines, technical momentum signals, and high volatility.
Primary Risks: High volatility, conflicting news sentiment, and potential earnings miss.
Investment Thesis: QUCY is a speculative stock with significant upside potential driven by its exposure to the growing drone market. The company's recent news headlines and technical indicators suggest a strong trend may be emerging.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive news headlines have boosted investor confidence in QUCY, contributing to its bullish momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish, Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish, Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $2.40 (resistance)
- SMA 50: $1.52 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $3.51 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- MACD signal: Bullish
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (45.26)
- Stochastic %K and %D: Oversold (11.75, 14.59)
- Williams %R: Overbought (-95.71)
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 7878076.35 (declining)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 896565436.75
- Volume Rate of Change: -18.36% (declining)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines highlighting QUCY's growth in the drone market.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregated sentiment is POSITIVE, driven by recent news and technical indicators.
Catalyst Identification: Earnings announcement, potential partnership or acquisition, and regulatory updates.
Market Narrative: Recent positive news has aligned with technical signals, suggesting a strong trend may be emerging.
Generated
News
All QUCY news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·3mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·4mo ago
BenzingaT3·4mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5mo ago
BenzingaT3·5mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5mo ago
QUCY Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 4.6427
Alpha: 329.56%
Correlation: 0.1374
R-Squared: 1.9%
Stock Volatility: 445.9%
Market Volatility: 13.2%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 157
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 157
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
QUCY Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
QUCY Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-12Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-12 | William J Caragol | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +212,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-07 | David E. Lazar | Chief Executive Officer | Conv (C) | +55,057,500 | $119.07 | $6.56B | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | David E. Lazar | Chief Executive Officer | Conv (C) | +55,057,500 | $119.07 | $6.56B | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Peter O'Rourke | Director | Grant (A) | +191,860 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | William J Caragol | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +212,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Louis R. Buffalino | Director | Grant (A) | +425,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Avraham Ben-Tzvi | Director | Award (A) | +112,859 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | David Natan | Director | Grant (A) | +191,860 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | William J Caragol | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +212,500 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Louis R. Buffalino | Director | Grant (A) | +425,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Peter O'Rourke | Director | Grant (A) | +191,860 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | Avraham Ben-Tzvi | Director | Award (A) | +112,859 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-06 | David Natan | Director | Grant (A) | +191,860 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-05 | Avraham Ben-Tzvi | Director | Award (A) | +112,259 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-04 | David Natan | Director | Grant (A) | +190,840 opt | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
QUCY Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $0.85
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David E. Lazar | Chief Executive Officer | 18,000,000 | $15.33M | $0 | 3 | 2026-08-07 |
| 2 | Avraham Ben-Tzvi | Director | 252,000 | $214.6K | $0 | 4 | 2026-08-06 |
| 3 | David Natan | Director | 137,141 | $116.8K | $0 | 4 | 2026-08-06 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
QUCY Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 12, 2026Directors 9
- Gregory J Tibbitts · since Jan 1, 2026
- Guido Baechler · since Jan 1, 2026
- Hans Hekland · since Jan 1, 2026
- Heinrich Dreismann · since Jan 1, 2026
- David E. Lazar · since Feb 13, 2026
- Avraham Ben-Tzvi · since Apr 22, 2026
- David Natan · since Apr 22, 2026
- Peter O'Rourke · since May 13, 2026
- Louis R. Buffalino · since Jul 1, 2026
Officers 2
- David E. Lazar · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Apr 2026
- William J Caragol · Chief Financial Officer · since Jan 1, 2026
10% owners 2
- David E. Lazar · listed since Apr 2026
- Kevin Michael Donahue · since Oct 17, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (15)
| Jul 1, 2026 | Louis R. Buffalino became a director |
| May 13, 2026 | Peter O'Rourke became a director |
| Apr 28, 2026 | David E. Lazar first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Apr 28, 2026 | David E. Lazar first listed as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 22, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Guido Baechler as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Apr 22, 2026 | David Natan became a director |
| Apr 22, 2026 | Avraham Ben-Tzvi became a director |
| Feb 13, 2026 | David E. Lazar became a director |
| Jan 1, 2026 | William J Caragol became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jan 1, 2026 | Heinrich Dreismann became a director |
| Jan 1, 2026 | Hans Hekland became a director |
| Jan 1, 2026 | Guido Baechler became a director |
| Jan 1, 2026 | Guido Baechler became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jan 1, 2026 | Gregory J Tibbitts became a director |
| Oct 17, 2025 | Kevin Michael Donahue became a 10% owner |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
QUCY Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-05-22
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
0 filings
· Last 90d:
0 filings
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 | BAECHLER GUIDO | Officer | 240,000 | $904.8K | 2026-05-22 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | BAECHLER GUIDO | Policy-Making Officer | 200,000 | $692.0K | 2026-05-15 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.