GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5d ago
SNAL Snail, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
SNAL
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 166
- List Date
- 2022-11-10
- CIK
- 0001886894
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-11
- EPS Forecast
- $0.59 (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Culver City, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.snail.com
Snail Inc is an independent developer and publisher of interactive digital entertainment for consumers around the world, with a portfolio of premium games designed for use on a variety of platforms, including consoles, PC's, and mobile devices. The geographic presence of the company is in the United States and the International market, where the majority of its revenue comes from the United States. The Company has one operating and reportable segment. The company operates in the USA, the UK and Other Countries.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 20.30% | -29.03% | 0.94% | -16.79% | -6.14% |
| Feb | -- | -9.30% | 16.37% | -31.03% | -8.31% | -8.07% |
| Mar | -- | -16.35% | -5.71% | -39.42% | -21.40% | -20.72% |
| Apr | -- | -2.38% | -7.62% | 21.69% | 29.66% | 10.34% |
| May | -- | 25.00% | -13.01% | -13.58% | 43.60% | 10.50% |
| Jun | -- | 1.26% | -4.27% | 50.55% | -29.92% | 4.40% |
| Jul | -- | 19.11% | -6.00% | -28.85% | 54.67% | 9.73% |
| Aug | -- | -35.16% | 3.86% | -15.10% | -30.12% | -19.13% |
| Sep | -- | -9.52% | -10.37% | 24.87% | -13.45% | -2.12% |
| Oct | -- | -9.30% | 90.35% | -10.83% | 1.69%* | 17.98% |
| Nov | 15.56% | 3.31% | -37.84% | -15.38% | -- | -8.59% |
| Dec | -43.24% | -2.38% | 30.07% | 3.49% | -- | -3.02% |
| Total | -34.41% | -27.91% | -19.32% | -60.67% | -25.56% | -33.58% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $2.23
SMA 50: $2.53
SMA 200: $3.38
Current: $2.41
EMA 12: $2.23
EMA 26: $2.33
MACD: -0.1080 | Signal: 0.0502
BEARISH
ADX (14): 32.36
TREND
+DI: 23.73
−DI: 14.62
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 53.31
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 61.90
Stoch %D: 54.90
Williams %R: -21.43
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $2.48
BB Lower: $1.98
NEUTRAL
OBV: 227,152,964
Vol SMA 20: 60,679
Vol ROC: 192.84%
ATR: $0.22
True Range: $0.35
HV 20: 73.9%
HV 30: 63.4%
HV 60: 112.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: SNAL
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key drivers:
- Recent positive news headlines surrounding Gamescom 2026, ChinaJoy, and new game releases
- Bullish momentum signals from technical indicators
Primary risks:
- High volatility, indicated by beta >1.5 and high stock movement relative to market
- No earnings data available for risk assessment
Investment Thesis: SNAL's recent positive news headlines and bullish momentum signals suggest a potential uptrend. However, the stock's high volatility and lack of earnings data make it difficult to assess its long-term prospects.
Recent news sentiment impact: The positive news headlines have contributed to the stock's current price movement.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): UPTREND; Medium-term (1-3 months): NEUTRAL; Long-term (3-12 months): BEARISH
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $4.85
- Middle Bollinger Band: $3.46
- Lower Bollinger Band: $2.07
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (36.40)
- MACD signal: BEARISH (MACD -0.37, Signal -0.04, Histogram -0.34)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Six recent news articles highlighting SNAL's upcoming game releases and events at Gamescom 2026 and ChinaJoy.
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE sentiment from news headlines.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming game releases, events at Gamescom 2026 and ChinaJoy.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.5).
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime indicated by stock movement relative to market.
Options Market Signals: No options data available for analysis.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $2.07 and $3.46, with potential risks below the lower Bollinger Band.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market (no specific data).
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest (OBV: 229397200.51).
Correlation Analysis: No correlation data available for analysis.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range ($2.93, $3.46, and $4.85).
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $2.07
- Middle Bollinger Band: $3.46
- Upper Bollinger Band: $4.85
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None specified.
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates, Gamescom 2026 and ChinaJoy events.
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels around $2.07 or lower, considering the stock's high volatility.
Conclusion: SNAL presents a mixed picture with recent positive news headlines and bullish momentum signals, but also high volatility and no earnings data available. The technical analysis suggests a potential uptrend in the short-term, while the risk assessment highlights the need for caution due to the stock's volatility and lack of long-term prospects.
Generated
News
All SNAL news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·25d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·25d ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·1mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·3mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
SNAL Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.0210
Alpha: 188.06%
Correlation: 0.0999
R-Squared: 1.0%
Stock Volatility: 385.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own SNAL
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $70K | #3021 of 3138 | new | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $20K | #6173 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SNAL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SNAL Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-01Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | Ying Zhou | Director | Award (A) | +1,100 | $0.91 | $1.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-28 | Ying Zhou | Director | Award (A) | +4,700 | $0.93 | $4.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | Ying Zhou | Director | Award (A) | +500 | $0.99 | $495 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-25 | Ryan Jamieson | Director | Award (A) | +71,110 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-25 | Neil Foster | Director | Award (A) | +133,332 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-25 | Sandra Pundmann | Director | Award (A) | +133,332 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-03-13 | Ryan Jamieson | Director | Grant (A) | +43,478 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-14 | Sandra Pundmann | Director | Award (A) | +12,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-14 | Heidy Kingwan Chow | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +262,080 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-14 | Jim S. Tsai | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +436,800 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-14 | Neil Foster | Director | Award (A) | +12,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-14 | Peter Yung Kang | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +262,080 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
SNAL Insider Holdings
4 insiders · @ $2.41
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neil Foster | Director | 29,066 | $70.0K | $0 | 2 | 2025-06-25 |
| 2 | Sandra Pundmann | Director | 29,066 | $70.0K | $0 | 2 | 2025-06-25 |
| 3 | Ryan Jamieson | Director | 22,918 | $55.2K | $0 | 2 | 2025-06-25 |
| 4 | Ying Zhou | Director | 1,260 | $3.0K | $0 | 3 | 2026-06-01 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
SNAL Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 1, 2026Directors 5
- Hai Shi · since Nov 9, 2022
- Neil Foster · since Nov 9, 2022
- Sandra Pundmann · since Nov 9, 2022
- Ying Zhou · since Nov 9, 2022
- Ryan Jamieson · since Nov 10, 2023
10% owners 1
- Ying Zhou · listed since May 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (15)
| May 20, 2026 | Ying Zhou first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Apr 15, 2024 | Xuedong Tian became Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| Nov 10, 2023 | Ryan Jamieson became a director |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Ying Zhou became a director |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Xiaoming Ye became a 10% owner |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Suzhou Ding Rong Investment Management Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Sandra Pundmann became a director |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Qianrong Capital Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Peter Yung Kang became Chief Operating Officer |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Neil Foster became a director |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Jim S. Tsai became Chief Executive Officer |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Hua Yuan International Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Heidy Kingwan Chow became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Hai Shi became a director |
| Nov 9, 2022 | Ancient Jade (East) Holdings Ltd became a 10% owner |
Not reported recently (9)
- Xuedong Tian · Last reported as Co-Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing dated Apr 19, 2024
- Ancient Jade (East) Holdings Ltd · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated May 9, 2023
- Hua Yuan International Ltd · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2023
- Qianrong Capital Ltd · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 7, 2023
- Suzhou Ding Rong Investment Management Ltd · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 7, 2023
- Xiaoming Ye · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 7, 2023
- Peter Yung Kang · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Nov 14, 2022
- Heidy Kingwan Chow · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Nov 14, 2022
- Jim S. Tsai · Last reported as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing dated Nov 14, 2022
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
2 ETFs hold SNAL
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.