SOUL Soulpower Acquisition Corporation
XNYS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- BLANK CHECKS (6770)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
- List Date
- 2025-05-23
- CIK
- 0002025608
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
- Homepage
- https://www.soulpowerhq.com
Soulpower Acquisition Corp is a blank check company.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 0.89% | 0.89% |
| Feb | -- | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| Mar | -- | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| Apr | -- | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| May | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.08% |
| Jun | 1.01% | 0.05% | 0.53% |
| Jul | 0.59% | 0.29% | 0.44% |
| Aug | -0.10% | 0.82% | 0.36% |
| Sep | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| Oct | 0.99% | 0.38% | 0.69% |
| Nov | -0.20% | 0.00%* | -0.10% |
| Dec | 0.15% | -- | 0.15% |
| Total | 2.73% | 3.16% | 2.95% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: SOUL
Executive Summary:
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key drivers: Bullish momentum, strong trend strength, and positive news sentiment.
Primary risks: Overbought RSI levels and potential mean reversion.
Investment thesis: SOUL is likely to continue its upward trajectory due to the confluence of technical and fundamental factors.
Recent news sentiment impact: Positive news headline contributed to the stock's price increase.
Technical Analysis:
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels: Key levels include SMA 20 ($10.39), SMA 50 ($10.36), and Bollinger Bands Upper ($10.42).
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Overbought (77.85 > 70)
- MACD signal: Bullish (0.02 / Signal: 0.00 / Histogram: 0.01)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze (Price touching upper band)
Volume Analysis: Volume trends indicate institutional interest, with a volume rate of change of 1218.08%.
News & Sentiment Analysis:
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headline about the company's update and re-designed firm website.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is POSITIVE.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings release (no specific date available).
Market Narrative: The positive news headline aligns with the stock's upward trajectory, supporting the bullish momentum.
Risk & Volatility Assessment:
Beta Interpretation: Negative beta (-0.01) indicates that SOUL moves opposite to the market, which may pose a risk for investors seeking to hedge their exposure.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are moderate (HV20 1.8%, HV30 1.6%, HV60 1.4%).
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels include SMA 50 ($10.36) and Bollinger Bands Lower ($10.36).
Market Context & Positioning:
Sector Performance: SOUL is outperforming its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is indicated by the volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: SOUL has a negative correlation (-0.03) with the market, which may pose a risk for investors seeking to hedge their exposure.
Relative Valuation: SOUL is positioned within its trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items:
- Critical price levels: SMA 20 ($10.39), SMA 50 ($10.36), and Bollinger Bands Upper ($10.42).
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified.
- Time-sensitive catalysts: Upcoming earnings release (no specific date available).
- Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels around SMA 50 ($10.36) and position sizing considerations based on the stock's volatility.
Please note that this analysis is based solely on the provided data and should not be considered as personalized investment advice.
SOUL Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 234
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $6.7M | #1865 of 3716 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $111K | #5754 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SOUL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 5 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
SOUL Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jul 25, 2025Directors 8
- Daniel G Hickey JR · since Apr 1, 2025
- David Magli · since Apr 1, 2025
- Frank Candio · since Apr 1, 2025
- Jeffrey D Hoffman · since Apr 1, 2025
- Justin Lafazan · since Apr 1, 2025
- Marques Colston · since Apr 1, 2025
- Natasha Srulowitz · since Apr 1, 2025
- Teresa Strassner · since Apr 1, 2025
Officers 3
- Justin Lafazan · CEO and Chairman · since Apr 1, 2025
- Joshua Alexander Lafazan · President · since Jul 7, 2025
- Teresa Strassner · CFO and Director · since Apr 1, 2025
10% owners 3
- Justin Lafazan · since Apr 1, 2025
- Soulpower Acquisition Sponsor LLC (entity) · since Apr 1, 2025
- Soulpower Management LLC (entity) · on file since Apr 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (18)
| Apr 1, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Blake Janover from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 23, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Ty Sagalow from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 7, 2025 | Joshua Alexander Lafazan became President |
| Apr 7, 2025 | Soulpower Management LLC first on file as a 10% owner |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Ty Sagalow became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Teresa Strassner became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Teresa Strassner became CFO and Director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Soulpower Acquisition Sponsor LLC became a 10% owner |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Natasha Srulowitz became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Marques Colston became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Justin Lafazan became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Justin Lafazan became a 10% owner |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Justin Lafazan became CEO and Chairman |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Jeffrey D Hoffman became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Frank Candio became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | David Magli became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Daniel G Hickey JR became a director |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Blake Janover became a director |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-12 | 0001493152-26-037395 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
SOUL vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCCX Churchill Capital Corp X Class A Ordinar | $711M | — | — | −19.1% | — |
| DMII Drugs Made In America Acquisition II Cor | $650M | — | — | +3.3% | — |
| EVAC EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II | $606M | — | — | +3.4% | — |
| BCSS Bain Capital GSS Investment Corp. | $598M | — | — | +1.3% | — |
| CEPF Cantor Equity Partners IV, Inc. Class A | $589M | — | — | −0.3% | — |
| CXII Churchill Capital Corp XII Class A Ordin | $575M | — | — | +2.8% | — |
| AEXA American Exceptionalism Acquisition Corp | $526M | — | — | −7.3% | 17 |
| CAEP Cantor Equity Partners III, Inc. Class A | $526M | — | — | +46.9% | — |
| SOUL Soulpower Acquisition Corporation | $358M | — | — | +3.7% | — |
| Peer median | $593M | — | — | +2.0% | 17 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.