SUZ Suzano S.A. American Depositary Shares (each representing one Ordinary Share ) representing one Ordinary Share)
XNYS
9.85
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
SUZ
$9.85
—
What changed
Recent filings, trades and movesKey stats
$9.85
- 52-Week Range
- $7.55 – $11.54
- YTD
- +3.41%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 65.8
- Straddle Price
- $1.05
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.28
- Market Cap
- $11.9B
- Open
- $9.59
- Day Range
- $9.57 – $9.86
- Volume
- 2,848,547
- Prev Close
- $9.66
Fair Value
MODEL: SHORT
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.90% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.67 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 8.26% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.37% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +58.5pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $8.90 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $8.88 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 18.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.0B |
| Market Cap | $12B |
Peers used for multiples: GFI, GGB, NEM, NTR, SCCO, STLD, TECK, VALE
60-Day Conviction
79%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$9.82
α -0.2%
rank 36%
conviction
18%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$9.67
α -1.7%
rank 36%
conviction
57%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$9.47
α -3.8%
rank 36%
conviction
79%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $4.18 | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 16.1× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 10.8× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | median 3.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 4.7× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $8.90 | 100% | stability 57% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- PAPER MILLS (2621) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $11.9B
- Employees
- 23,094
- List Date
- 1993-10-01
- CIK
- 0000909327
- Homepage
- https://www.suzano.com.br
Suzano SA produces and sells pulp and a variety of paper products. The company organizes itself into two segments based on product type: Pulp and Paper. The Pulp segment generates the majority of revenue. The firm's product portfolio includes printing and writing paper, paperboard, diapers, and sanitary napkins. The company owns forest land and plants in Brazil, where it harvests timber and turns the timber into pulp and paper in its plants.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.52% | 6.37% | 0.55% | -6.73% | 6.40% | -1.58% | 1.09% |
| Feb | 11.30% | -5.40% | -1.62% | 9.66% | -11.43% | 21.57% | 4.01% |
| Mar | -7.77% | 8.80% | -9.18% | 10.08% | -1.17% | -10.47% | -1.62% |
| Apr | 4.53% | -13.68% | -5.01% | -12.32% | -5.24% | -12.09% | -7.30% |
| May | -5.57% | 11.03% | 12.71% | -17.04% | -1.25% | -6.08% | -1.03% |
| Jun | 3.53% | -15.73% | 3.02% | 14.37% | 7.18% | -4.43% | 1.32% |
| Jul | -12.79% | -1.99% | 8.90% | -6.74% | -0.43% | 8.88% | -0.69% |
| Aug | 9.81% | -5.91% | 0.10% | 3.51% | 4.51% | 2.23% | 2.38% |
| Sep | -15.54% | -1.79% | 4.47% | 3.31% | -2.19% | -3.27% | -2.50% |
| Oct | -10.33% | 17.87% | -4.22% | 1.78% | -3.83% | 11.33% | 2.10% |
| Nov | 14.48% | -0.97% | 4.93% | 1.27% | -1.10% | 6.43%* | 4.17% |
| Dec | 5.57% | -9.50% | 7.27% | -1.17% | 5.18% | -- | 1.47% |
| Total | -6.65% | -15.40% | 21.66% | -4.84% | -4.89% | 7.84% | -0.38% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $8.94
SMA 50: $8.92
SMA 200: $9.02
Current: $9.84
EMA 12: $9.30
EMA 26: $9.04
MACD: 0.2591 | Signal: 0.1116
BULLISH
ADX (14): 31.54
TREND
+DI: 31.06
−DI: 7.30
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 77.74
OVERBOUGHT
Stoch %K: 96.37
Stoch %D: 94.33
Williams %R: -1.30
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $9.85
BB Lower: $8.03
NEUTRAL
OBV: -9,239,330
Vol SMA 20: 4,368,587
Vol ROC: -73.91%
ATR: $0.25
True Range: $0.29
HV 20: 21.4%
HV 30: 22.4%
HV 60: 29.1%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is the comprehensive stock analysis report for SUZ:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers: Recent news headlines and technical indicators suggest a neutral market condition.
Primary Risks: Suzano's recent acquisitions and expansion plans may impact its financial performance, which could affect the stock price.
Investment Thesis: SUZ is a mid-cap company with a stable industry presence, but its recent acquisition plans and earnings expectations are uncertain. A cautious approach is advised due to mixed technical signals and market volatility.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had little impact on the stock price, indicating a neutral sentiment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL
- Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH
- Long-term (3-12 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels: The SMA 20, SMA 50, and EMA 26 serve as support levels, while the upper Bollinger Band ($9.01) is a potential resistance level.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (38.36)
- MACD signal: BEARISH (-0.26 / Signal: 0.02 / Histogram: -0.28)
- Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL
Volume Analysis: The volume trend is neutral, with no clear indication of institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The news headlines are primarily neutral, with some positive sentiment around Suzano's acquisition plans.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL.
Catalyst Identification: The upcoming earnings release may be a catalyst for price movement.
Market Narrative: The recent news headlines do not strongly contradict the technical signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: SUZ's beta (0.69) indicates low risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is relatively low compared to historical levels.
Options Market Signals:
- IV rank: 48.6% (Medium)
- Put/call ratios: 0.33 (Bullish sentiment)
- Unusual activity: None notable
Downside Protection: Support levels are present, but caution is advised due to the bearish MACD signal.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Suzano's industry is stable and experiencing moderate growth.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is neutral, with no clear indication of significant buying or selling pressure.
Correlation Analysis: SUZ has a low correlation (0.28) with the market, indicating limited price movement relative to broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: SUZ is trading within its historical range, with some value investors considering it undervalued.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 20 ($8.56), EMA 26 ($8.72)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($9.01)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The upper Bollinger Band ($9.01) is a potential breakout level, while the SMA 50 ($9.17) may serve as a breakdown point.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings release (no date provided)
Risk Management: Monitor the technical signals and adjust position sizes accordingly. Consider placing stop-loss orders around the critical price levels.
Generated
News
All SUZ news →
Beto Abreu, CEO, Suzano; T.H. Helene Budliger Artieda, State Secretary, Swiss Confederation; T.H. Kitila Alexander Mkumbo, Minister of State, President’s Office for Planning & Investment, United Republic of Tanzania; and Masayuki Omoto, President & CEO, Marubeni Corporation…
SUZ Options Activity & IV Rank
SUZ IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 74.9%
7-DTE IV: 74.9%
Expected Move: $1.05
7-DTE Move: $0.88
Days to Exp: 39 (2026-12-18)
Options Flow · All expiries
Call Volume: 172
Put Volume: 221
P/C Volume: 1.285
NEUTRAL
Call OI: 1,313
Put OI: 494
P/C OI: 0.376
Total OI: 1,807
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $0.15
ATM Put: $0.90
Call %: 1.5%
Put %: 9.1%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 393
Chain OI: 1,807
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 73rd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
73%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.79
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.91
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.85
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.91: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.85: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 4 ATM contracts, 1k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Volatility Smile
Loading the implied volatility smile…
IV Rank (7 DTE)23.6LowNov 9
IV Rank (30 DTE)65.8MediumNov 9
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$1.05Nov 9
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.6100
Alpha: 6.86%
Correlation: 0.2759
R-Squared: 7.6%
Stock Volatility: 30.5%
Market Volatility: 13.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own SUZ
3 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $5.3M | #1435 of 3138 | -5.0% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $2.2M | #2805 of 6285 | -84.5% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $8K | #4108 of 4729 | -77.2% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
SUZ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 66 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
2 filers$2.68M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $2.56M | 95.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $118.73K | 4.43% | 2026-06-30 |
4 filers$6.62M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $6.29M | 94.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $130.37K | 1.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $110.19K | 1.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $96.22K | 1.45% | 2026-06-30 |
SUZ Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-16Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | Walter Schalka | Disp (D) | −33,679 RSU | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-10-16 | Douglas Seibert Lazaretti | Executive VP of Forestry | Disp (D) | −46,322 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-16 | Marcos Moreno Chagas Assumpcao | VP of Finance and IR | Disp (D) | −31,434 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-16 | Walter Schalka | Disp (D) | −33,679 RSU | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-10-16 | Fabio Almeida de Oliveira | VP of Paper and Packaging | Disp (D) | −40,236 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-16 | Carlos Anibal Fernandes de Almeida Junior | VP of Pulp, Eng. , Energy | Disp (D) | −56,290 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-16 | Walner Alves Cunha Junior | VP Legal, Tax and Corp Affairs | Disp (D) | −33,679 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-16 | Leonardo Barreto de Araujo Grimaldi | VP of Pulp Commercial and Log. | Disp (D) | −60,259 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-16 | Machado Pablo Francisco Gimenez | VP Consumer Goods and Strategy | Disp (D) | −20,277 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-20 | Daniel Feffer | Director | Other (J) | −8,363,360 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-20 | Gabriela Feffer Moll | Other (J) | +253,570 | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-08-20 | David Feffer | Director | Other (J) | −8,218,013 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-28 | Aires Galhardo | VP of Pulp Operations | Grant (A) | +37,743 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-28 | Fabio Almeida de Oliveira | VP of Paper and Packaging | Grant (A) | +54,651 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-28 | Luis Renato Costa Bueno | Executive VP of Consumer Goods | Grant (A) | +36,395 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
SUZ Insider Holdings
4 insiders · @ $9.84
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Feffer | Director | 412,917,186 | $4.06B | $0 | 1 | 2026-08-20 |
| 2 | Daniel Feffer | Director | 407,326,274 | $4.01B | $0 | 1 | 2026-08-20 |
| 3 | Gabriela Feffer Moll | 255,570 | $2.51M | $0 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | |
| 4 | Joao Alberto Fernandez de Abreu | CEO | 168,840 | $1.66M | $0 | 1 | 2026-04-17 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
21 ETFs hold SUZ
21 shown · $107.06M total exposure · 0.12% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GNR State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 1.38% | $73.8M | $5.3B | 2026-11-05 |
| 2 | AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.09% | $22.9M | $26.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 3 | SPEM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.03% | $4.5M | $16.2B | 2026-11-05 |
| 4 | AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | Avantis | 0.16% | $2.2M | $1.4B | 2026-11-05 |
| 5 | DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $2.1M | $11.7B | 2026-11-05 |
| 6 | DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.07% | $1.6M | $2.1B | 2026-11-05 |
| 7 | DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.02% | $1.5M | $8.6B | 2026-11-05 |
| 8 | HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | VanEck | 0.29% | $934,781 | $320.6M | 2026-11-05 |
| 9 | DFAE Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $852,768 | $8.9B | 2026-11-05 |
| 10 | NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF | Nport | 1.90% | $710,392 | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 11 | OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | Nport | 2.06% | $577,996 | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.13% | $515,888 | $416.0M | 2026-11-05 |
| 13 | AVSE Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.14% | $295,726 | $213.7M | 2026-11-05 |
| 14 | DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $275,186 | $566.6M | 2026-11-05 |
| 15 | DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF | Dimensional | 0.07% | $191,387 | $251.0M | 2026-11-05 |
| 16 | NSI National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF | Nport | 0.11% | $44,219 | — | 2026-08-31 |
| 17 | DEHP Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF | Dimensional | 0.01% | $36,622 | $394.3M | 2026-11-05 |
| 18 | TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | Nport | 0.06% | $14,697 | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 19 | QEMM State Street® SPDR® MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors℠ ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.02% | $11,657 | $54.5M | 2026-11-05 |
| 20 | AVNC Avantis All International Core Equity ETF | Avantis | 0.00% | $1,796 | $96.1M | 2026-11-05 |
| 21 | BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | -0.29% | $-5,992,812 | $2.1B | 2026-11-06 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
—
TTM Revenue
—
TTM Net Income
—
TTM Op. Cash Flow
—
SUZ vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | $142.7B | 23.1 | +38.7% | +24.5% | 34 |
| NEM Newmont Corporation | $125.6B | 14.7 | +23.7% | +25.0% | 33 |
| VALE VALE S.A. | $49.3B | — | — | −9.4% | 32 |
| GFI Gold Fields Ltd ADR | $34.7B | — | — | −4.8% | 34 |
| NTR Nutrien Ltd. Common Shares | $33.9B | — | — | +15.2% | 59 |
| STLD Steel Dynamics Inc | $31.7B | 16.7 | +26.0% | +28.8% | 59 |
| TECK Teck Resources Limited | $29.7B | — | — | +34.7% | 58 |
| SUZ Suzano S.A. American Depositary Shares ( | $11.9B | — | — | +3.4% | 66 |
| GGB Gerdau S.A. | $8.6B | — | — | +21.3% | 27 |
| Peer median | $34.3B | 16.7 | +26.0% | +22.9% | 34 |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
12.90M
SI % of Float
1.02%
Days to Cover
4.35
Short Vol Ratio
49.6%
Free Float
—
Float %
—
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06