TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. Common Stock

XNAS 3.12 Delayed
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

TUSK $3.12 —

What changed

Recent filings, trades and moves
Key stats
$3.12
52-Week Range
$1.72 – $3.92
YTD
+58.54%
Straddle Price
$2.78
P/C Vol Ratio
0.04
Market Cap
$0.1B
Open
$3.16
Day Range
$3.04 – $3.17
Volume
144,815
Prev Close
$3.11
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG

A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.

  • DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
  • Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
  • DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
  • P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
  • Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
  • Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
  • Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
  • Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
10-yr Treasury (rf)4.90%
Beta vs SPY0.89
Cost of Equity (CAPM)9.36% (VRP-adj)
WACC9.44%
Volatility Risk Premium+54.5pp (IV − HV30)
Effective Tax Rate21.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input)+30.0%
DCF Horizon10 years explicit + fade
Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM)×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S)
Free Cash Flow (TTM)$-0.1B
Return on Equity (TTM)1.7%
Book / Price175.4% — banking bias active (P/B is primary)
Gross Margin (TTM)32.2%
FCF Margin (TTM)-205.8%
Debt / Equity0.00
Quality Score2/6 — normal (10y DCF)
SMA 50$2.95 (Market Anchor value)
SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid$2.86
Bollinger Width / SMA2023.3% (drives anchor stability)
Net Debt$-0.0B
Market Cap$0B
Peers used for multiples: CRGY, HP, LBRT, PARR, PTEN, VSAT, WTTR (filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
60-Day Conviction
73%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 8, 2026
$3.13
α +0.3% rank 65%
conviction
21%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 6, 2027
$3.17
α +1.3% rank 63%
conviction
48%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Feb 4, 2027
$3.23
α +3.2% rank 74%
conviction
73%
MethodImplied PriceWeightDetail
DCF n/a 0%
DDM (Gordon) n/a 0%
Peer P/E $6.70 9% median 55.3× · 4 peers
Peer EV/EBITDA $2.03 11% median 5.9× · 7 peers
Peer P/B $7.37 15% median 1.4× · 7 peers
Peer P/S $1.38 15% median 0.9× · 7 peers
Market Anchor (SMA50) $2.95 50% stability 66% (BB-width)
Options Expected (B-L 30d) n/a 0%
As of 2026-11-09 · updated
About
Industry (SIC)
OIL & GAS FIELD SERVICES, NEC (1389) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.1B
Employees
115
List Date
2016-10-14
CIK
0001679268
Last Earnings
Oct 30 before open · +9.3% vs ±36.1% expected
Headquarters
Oklahoma City, OK
Homepage
https://www.mammothenergy.com

Mammoth Energy Services Inc is an integrated energy services company engaged in providing products and services to enable the exploration and development of North American onshore unconventional oil and natural gas reserves as well as the construction and repair of the electric grid for private utilities, public investor-owned utilities, and co-operative utilities through infrastructure services businesses. The company had three reportable segments, which includes rental services, infrastructure services, natural sand proppant services, accommodation services, and drilling services.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan-10.27%-10.36%-2.97%-20.59%0.34%18.78%-4.18%
Feb36.95%-15.54%-13.56%4.00%-15.52%-4.15%-1.30%
Mar-9.06%46.90%-24.37%-2.67%-6.42%-1.21%0.53%
Apr-28.73%-3.96%-20.99%-11.92%23.41%20.68%-3.58%
May2.15%-0.92%-3.01%14.15%2.33%19.22%5.65%
Jun18.91%-2.65%32.33%-9.39%4.87%-3.85%6.70%
Jul-19.03%31.67%4.04%23.31%-7.47%-16.14%2.73%
Aug-6.68%23.95%-7.40%-2.80%-6.69%15.93%2.72%
Sep-16.86%-17.03%-3.53%12.98%-2.97%-8.39%-5.97%
Oct12.83%60.44%-8.99%6.54%-10.92%11.97%11.98%
Nov-44.54%5.41%8.87%-5.31%-14.42%0.81%*-8.20%
Dec-8.54%55.58%-0.34%-12.54%3.93%--7.62%
Total-65.22%267.07%-40.97%-12.51%-30.27%56.42%29.09%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $2.87
SMA 50: $2.95
SMA 200: $2.80
Current: $3.12
EMA 12: $3.00
EMA 26: $2.94
MACD: 0.0592 | Signal: 0.0388
BULLISH
ADX (14): 25.33
TREND
+DI: 27.56
−DI: 14.74

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 60.70
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 60.74
Stoch %D: 58.43
Williams %R: -32.64

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $3.22
BB Lower: $2.52
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,259,084
Vol SMA 20: 141,152
Vol ROC: -36.31%
ATR: $0.16
True Range: $0.13
HV 20: 47.8%
HV 30: 42.7%
HV 60: 44.0%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-11-08T00:00:00 – 2026-11-06T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Written before TUSK’s Oct 30 earnings report, so it doesn’t reflect the results.

LLM Stock Analysis Report - TUSK

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)

Key Drivers:

  • Recent lack of price movement due to no recent news or earnings
  • Trend indicators showing a potential downtrend, with MACD bearish signal
  • RSI indicating neutral sentiment
  • Beta at 0.88, suggesting moderate volatility

Primary Risks:

  • Potential for further downside if trend indicators continue to decline
  • Unusual options activity may be signaling potential reversal or trap

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - Downtrend, Medium-term (1-3 months) - Consolidation, Long-term (3-12 months) - Uptrend

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • Lower Bollinger Band: $1.74
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $2.23
  • SMA 20: $1.98
  • EMA 12: $1.89

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI (14): 31.80 (neutral)
  • MACD: -0.11 / Signal: -0.02 / Histogram: -0.09 (bearish)

Volume Analysis: Volume trend is down, with OBV and volume rate of change indicating selling pressure.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available

Sentiment Assessment: Neutral due to lack of recent news

Catalyst Identification: None identified

Market Narrative: Technical signals are mixed, with potential downtrend and neutral RSI. Options market is pricing a $1.25 move by expiration.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: 0.88 (moderate volatility)

Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels suggest moderate volatility

Options Market Signals:

  • IV Rank: 26.6% (Medium)
  • Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.50 (Bullish sentiment)
  • Put/Call OI Ratio: 2.27
  • Market Expectation: Options market pricing $1.25 move by expiration

Downside Protection: Lower Bollinger Band and SMA 20 provide support.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: Not applicable (single-stock analysis)

Institutional Activity: Unusual options activity may be signaling potential reversal or trap

Correlation Analysis: Correlation with market is moderate (0.29)

Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, with no clear upside or downside catalysts.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • Lower Bollinger Band: $1.74
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $2.23
  • SMA 20: $1.98
  • EMA 12: $1.89

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or significant news events.

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations should be based on individual risk tolerance and market conditions.

This analysis provides a comprehensive view of TUSK's technical, fundamental, and sentiment signals. The neutral overall assessment reflects the mixed signals from trend indicators, RSI, and options market. The potential downtrend and moderate volatility suggest caution, while the unusual options activity may signal a potential reversal or trap.

Generated
Earnings History
18 of 19 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
50.93%
Avg Actual Move
6.34%
Each row pairs the pre-earnings straddle-implied expected move with the realized close-to-close move. Sorted oldest first.
Earnings Date Timing Expected Move Actual Move Ratio Outcome
2021-02-25 After-Close 33.81% 12.58% 0.37x Within
2021-04-29 After-Close 9.09% 3.54% 0.39x Within
2021-07-30 After-Close 51.37% 2.19% 0.04x Within
2021-11-05 After-Close 21.52% 2.32% 0.11x Within
2022-05-09 After-Close 31.41% 12.54% 0.40x Within
2022-10-27 After-Close 22.37% 6.42% 0.29x Within
2023-02-23 After-Close 26.72% 3.02% 0.11x Within
2023-08-11 After-Close 22.35% 17.64% 0.79x Within
2024-05-02 After-Close 22.76% 1.28% 0.06x Within
2024-08-09 After-Close 29.15% 1.55% 0.05x Within
2024-11-01 After-Close 32.65% 2.86% 0.09x Within
2025-03-07 After-Close 25.38% 1.78% 0.07x Within
2025-05-07 Pre-Market 17.86% 5.64% 0.32x Within
2025-08-08 After-Close 10.68% 5.98% 0.56x Within
2025-10-31 After-Close 513.48% 5.39% 0.01x Within
2026-03-06 After-Close 20.05% 3.77% 0.19x Within
2026-05-11 Pre-Market 13.60% 21.76% 1.60x Exceeded
2026-08-07 After-Close 27.29% 0.88% 0.03x Within
2026-10-30 Pre-Market 36.08% 9.28% 0.26x Within

Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →

TUSK Options Activity & IV Rank

Volatility Metrics

Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: $2.78
7-DTE Move: $0.68
Days to Exp: 39 (2026-12-18)

Options Flow · All expiries

Call Volume: 189
Put Volume: 7
P/C Volume: 0.037
BULLISH
Call OI: 1,992
Put OI: 202
P/C OI: 0.101
Total OI: 2,194

ATM Options Pricing

ATM Call: $0.68
ATM Put: $2.10
Call %: 21.6%
Put %: 67.2%

Chain Summary

Chain Volume: 196
Chain OI: 2,194
Last Updated: 11/9/2026
Spread Scanner

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…

Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ

Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 60th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.

Gamma percentile
60%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.73
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.77
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
+0.60
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt -0.77: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt +0.60: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.

Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.

Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.

Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.

This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.

· 4 ATM contracts, 1k total OI
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
No data
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
No data

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Loading the implied volatility surface…

Volatility Smile

Loading the implied volatility smile…

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$2.78Nov 9
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.5664
Alpha: 64.10%
Correlation: 0.1091
R-Squared: 1.2%
Stock Volatility: 71.5%
Market Volatility: 13.8%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own TUSK
4 of 37 tracked investors
InvestorValueShare of their portfolioRankQ/Q sharesSource
Citadel Hedge fund
Ken Griffin
$1.5M
0.00%
#3248 of 6285+36.5%13F
Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund
Jim Simons
$950K
0.00%
#2333 of 3138+26.0%13F
Millennium Management Hedge fund
Izzy Englander
$404K
0.00%
#3252 of 3716new13F
Point72 Hedge fund
Steve Cohen
$234K
0.00%
#1758 of 1945new13F

Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions

TUSK Institutional Ownership (13F)

Filings for 2026-06-30 · 20 already for 2026-09-30
Diluted shares outstanding: 48,246,250 (as of 2026-09-30)

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

87 filers26,352,705 shares$84.52M value54.62% of float
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 WEXFORD CAPITAL LP 12,071,823 $39.23M 46.42% 25.02% 2026-06-30
2 ADAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS GP, L.L.C. 4,575,000 $14.87M 17.59% 9.48% 2026-06-30
3 Vanguard Capital Management LLC 1,059,603 $3.44M 4.07% 2.20% 2026-06-30
4 Russell Investments Group, Ltd. Custodian 790,337 $2.24M 2.66% 1.64% 2026-09-30
5 Peapod Lane Capital LLC 758,985 $2.16M 2.55% 1.57% 2026-09-30
6 Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Custodian 704,250 $2.00M 2.37% 1.46% 2026-09-30
7 Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian 506,662 $1.65M 1.95% 1.05% 2026-06-30
8 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian 452,163 $1.47M 1.74% 0.94% 2026-06-30
9 BlackRock, Inc. Custodian 407,976 $1.33M 1.57% 0.85% 2026-06-30
10 Marshall Wace, LLP Custodian 395,583 $1.29M 1.52% 0.82% 2026-06-30
11 Johns Hopkins University 387,359 $1.26M 1.49% 0.80% 2026-06-30
12 BRIDGEWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 332,313 $1.08M 1.28% 0.69% 2026-06-30
13 RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 292,280 $949.91K 1.12% 0.61% 2026-06-30
14 Arrowstreet Capital, Limited Partnership 290,096 $942.81K 1.12% 0.60% 2026-06-30
15 Geode Capital Management, LLC Custodian 322,457 $916.39K 1.08% 0.67% 2026-09-30
16 Empowered Funds, LLC Custodian 241,313 $784.27K 0.93% 0.50% 2026-06-30
17 AQR Capital Management, LLC Custodian 177,824 $577.93K 0.68% 0.37% 2026-06-30
18 Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co 161,791 $525.82K 0.62% 0.34% 2026-06-30
19 Round Rock Advisors LLC 152,841 $496.73K 0.59% 0.32% 2026-06-30
20 Morgan Stanley Custodian 133,560 $434.07K 0.51% 0.28% 2026-06-30
21 Centiva Capital, LP 130,870 $425.33K 0.50% 0.27% 2026-06-30
22 GSA CAPITAL PARTNERS LLP 129,547 $421.00K 0.50% 0.27% 2026-06-30
23 Millennium Management LLC Custodian 124,186 $403.60K 0.48% 0.26% 2026-06-30
24 ACADIAN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 122,050 $396.00K 0.47% 0.25% 2026-06-30
25 Stifel Financial Corp Custodian 105,572 $343.11K 0.41% 0.22% 2026-06-30
3 filers$485.42K notional
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian $458.57K 94.47% 2026-06-30
2 GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian $16.90K 3.48% 2026-06-30
3 Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian $9.94K 2.05% 2026-09-30
2 filers$11.66K notional
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
1 GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian $11.38K 97.56% 2026-06-30
2 Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian $284 2.44% 2026-09-30

TUSK Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2026-09-17
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2026-09-17 Mark Lawrence Plaumann Director Buy (P) +5,000 $3.00 $15.0K EDGAR
2026-07-01 Phillip Lancaster Director Other (J) +68,152 — EDGAR
2026-06-22 Paul M. Jacobi Chief Business Officer Other (J) +3,211 — EDGAR
2026-06-22 CD Holding Company, LLC 10%+ Owner Other (J) +6,470,441 — EDGAR
2026-06-22 Amron Holdings LLC Director Other (J) +29,450 — EDGAR
2026-06-22 Joseph Jacobs Chief Business Officer Mixed
Other +7,427,563 · Buy +4,019,574
+11,447,137 $2.60 $10.47M EDGAR
2026-06-15 Arthur H Amron Director Buy (P) +4,500 $3.25 $14.6K EDGAR
2026-05-28 Arthur H Amron Director Buy (P) +5,500 $3.25 $17.8K EDGAR
2025-12-15 Arthur H Amron Director Buy (P) +10,000 $1.89 $18.9K EDGAR
2025-05-27 Arthur L Smith Director Sell (S) −20,000 $2.51 -$50.2K EDGAR
2025-05-21 Arthur L Smith Director Sell (S) −65,000 $2.51 -$162.8K EDGAR
2024-12-16 Arthur H Amron Director Buy (P) +1,000 $2.97 $3.0K EDGAR
2024-11-26 Corey J. Booker Director Sell (S) −25,000 $3.45 -$86.3K EDGAR
2024-11-22 Corey J. Booker Director Sell (S) −11,709 $3.23 -$37.9K EDGAR
2024-11-15 Corey J. Booker Director Sell (S) −10,707 $3.62 -$38.7K EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

TUSK Insider Holdings

9 insiders · @ $3.12
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 Joseph Jacobs Chief Business Officer 12,071,823 $37.72M $10.59M 3 2026-06-22
2 CD Holding Company, LLC 10%+ Owner 6,470,441 $20.22M $0 1 2026-06-22
3 Phillip Lancaster Director 159,445 $498.3K $0 1 2026-07-01
4 Corey J. Booker Director 140,488 $439.0K -$176.3K 9 2024-11-26
5 Arthur L Smith Director 130,034 $406.4K -$326.2K 16 2025-05-27
6 Amron Holdings LLC Director 96,585 $301.8K $0 1 2026-06-22
7 Arthur H Amron Director 67,135 $209.8K $83.6K 13 2026-06-15
8 Paul M. Jacobi Chief Business Officer 31,067 $97.1K $0 6 2026-06-22
9 Mark Lawrence Plaumann Director 5,000 $15.6K $15.0K 1 2026-09-17
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.

TUSK Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Sep 17, 2026

Directors 11

Officers 5

10% owners 5

Changes in the last 10 years (26)
Sep 17, 2026Mark Lawrence Plaumann first on file as a director
Jul 1, 2026Phillip Lancaster first on file as a director
Jun 22, 2026Wexford GP LLC first listed as Chief Business Officer in an SEC filing
Jun 22, 2026Wexford Capital LP first listed as Chief Business Officer in an SEC filing
Jun 22, 2026Paul M. Jacobi first listed as Chief Business Officer in an SEC filing
Jun 22, 2026Joseph Jacobs first listed as Chief Business Officer in an SEC filing
Jun 22, 2026Charles E Davidson first listed as Chief Business Officer in an SEC filing
Jun 22, 2026CD Holding Company, LLC first on file as a 10% owner
Jun 22, 2026Amron Holdings LLC first on file as a director
May 30, 2025The company announced the departure of Arthur L Smith from the board in an SEC filing
Nov 7, 2024The company announced the departure of Arty Straehla as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing
Nov 6, 2024The company announced the departure of Arty Straehla from the board in an SEC filing
Jun 30, 2021GPOR Distribution Trust became a 10% owner
Aug 17, 2020Corey J. Booker became a director
Jul 2, 2020Paul M. Jacobi became a director
Nov 18, 2019Jonathan H Yellen became a director
Nov 15, 2019Wexford Spectrum Trading LTD first on file as a director
Nov 15, 2019Wexford Spectrum Trading LTD first on file as a 10% owner
Nov 15, 2019Wexford Catalyst Trading LTD first on file as a director
Nov 15, 2019Wexford Catalyst Trading LTD first on file as a 10% owner
Not reported recently (11)
  • Mark E. Layton · Last reported as CFO and Secretary in an SEC filing dated Mar 7, 2023
  • GPOR Distribution Trust · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Jul 12, 2021
  • Matthew Ross · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 22, 2019
  • Meh Sub LLC · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 22, 2019
  • Wexford Catalyst Trading LTD · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 22, 2019
  • Wexford Spectrum Trading LTD · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 22, 2019
  • Jonathan H Yellen · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 20, 2019
  • Marc T McCarthy · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 7, 2019
  • Paul K Heerwagen IV · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 7, 2019
  • Rusty Neal LaForge · Last reported as VP, Gen. Couns., Asst. Sec. in an SEC filing dated Aug 9, 2018
  • Gulfport Energy Corp · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 1, 2018
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.

TUSK Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)

Latest: 2025-08-12
Last 30d: 0 filings  ·  Last 90d: 0 filings

What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.

How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.

10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.

"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.

Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.

Filed Filer Role Shares Notice Value Planned Sale Broker Plan Link
2025-08-12 SMITH ARTHUR L Director 102,178 $231.0K 2025-08-12 Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC — EDGAR
2025-05-12 SMITH ARTHUR L Director 100,000 $253.0K 2025-05-12 Charles Schwab & Co. — EDGAR
2024-11-07 Booker Corey J. Director 64,767 $250.0K 2024-11-07 Rockefeller Financial LLC — EDGAR
2023-12-13 Straehla Arty Officer 190,000 $837.9K 2023-12-13 Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC — EDGAR
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-10-30
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
Filing Date Event Link
2026-10-30 Material agreement · New debt obligation · Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
2026-10-30 Earnings results · Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
2026-08-07 Earnings results · Regulation FD disclosure EDGAR
2026-06-26 Shareholder vote results EDGAR
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
Filing Date Accession Link
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
Filing Date Accession Link
2026-10-30 0001628280-26-068605 EDGAR
2026-08-07 0001628280-26-054813 EDGAR
ETF Holders
12 ETFs hold TUSK
12 shown · $5.74M total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
1 VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF Vanguard 0.00% $2.2M — 2026-09-30
2 DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF Dimensional 0.00% $927,489 — 2026-11-05
3 VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF Vanguard 0.00% $796,589 — 2026-09-30
4 BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF Nport 0.03% $784,267 — 2026-06-30
5 IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF iShares (BlackRock) 0.03% $346,180 $1.2B 2026-11-06
6 DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap ETF Dimensional 0.00% $266,972 — 2026-11-05
7 DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF Dimensional 0.00% $119,841 — 2026-11-05
8 DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF Dimensional 0.00% $113,061 — 2026-11-05
9 AVSC Avantis U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF Avantis 0.00% $73,043 $3.2B 2026-11-05
10 DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF Dimensional 0.00% $64,559 — 2026-11-05
11 DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF Dimensional 0.00% $50,934 — 2026-11-05
12 DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF Dimensional 0.00% $13,595 $2.3B 2026-11-05
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.

Trailing P/E
28.41
TTM Diluted EPS
$0.11
TTM Revenue
$69.43M
TTM Net Income
$4.55M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-19.42M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
QuarterPeriod EndRevenueNet IncomeDiluted EPSOp. Cash Flow
Q3 '262026-09-30$21.35M$126.00K$0.01$91.00K
Q1 '262026-03-31$22.03M$5.19M$0.11$-3.03M
Q4 '252025-12-31$-2.51M$8.90M$0.19$-9.49M
Q3 '252025-09-30$10.85M$-12.62M$-0.26$730.00K
Q2 '252025-06-30$16.41M$8.85M$0.18$-12.52M
Q1 '252025-03-31$11.63M$-537.00K$-0.01$2.71M
Q4 '242024-12-31$53.20M$-15.48M$-0.32$141.42M
Q3 '242024-09-30$17.05M$-24.04M$-0.50$-1.23M
Q2 '242024-06-30$16.02M$-155.99M$-3.25$-6.82M
Q1 '242024-03-31$43.19M$-11.81M$-0.25$47.35M
Q4 '232023-12-31$52.78M$-5.96M$-0.13$6.43M
Q3 '232023-09-30$64.96M$-1.09M$-0.02$-7.66M
Q3 2026 • period ending 2026-09-30 • filed 2026-10-30
Valuation

Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.

Price Multiples
  • P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
  • P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
  • P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
  • EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
  • EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
  • ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
  • ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
  • Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
  • FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
  • Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
  • Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
  • Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
  • Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
  • Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
28.41
P/B
0.57
P/S
2.83
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
1.09
ROE
0.5%
ROA
0.4%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-16.11%
Debt/Equity
0.00
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$150.93M
as of 2026-11-09

TUSK vs Peers

Related companies, largest first
Company Market cap P/E Revenue growth YTD IV rank
VSAT Viasat Inc $8.8B — +2.7% +96.4% 59
VSXY Victorias Secret & Co. $8.6B 26.8 — +44.8% 52
CRGY Crescent Energy Company $4.7B — +33.5% +28.1% 31
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy Inc $3.8B — +0.0% +50.9% 40
HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc. $3.5B — +15.9% +17.5% 68
PARR Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. Common Stock $3.4B 3.5 +29.1% +89.2% 61
WTTR Select Water Solutions, Inc. $2.2B 55.0 −2.0% +38.9% 65
LBRT Liberty Energy Inc. $2.0B 53.7 +13.6% −31.7% 86
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. Common Sto $150M 28.4 −21.1% +58.6% 17
Peer median $3.6B 40.2 +13.6% +41.8% 60

P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.

Short Interest & Float

Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.

Metric definitions
  • Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
  • SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
  • Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
  • Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
  • Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
  • Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
  • SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
  • 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
  • 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
  • >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
  • Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
  • Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
  • A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.

Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.

Short Interest
100.50K
SI % of Float
0.29%
Days to Cover
1.20
Short Vol Ratio
73.7%
Free Float
34.96M
Float %
72.7%
Short interest 2026-10-15 • Short volume 2026-11-06 • Float 2026-08-14