TWAV TaoWeave, Inc. Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. (7370) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 7
- List Date
- 1995-06-15
- CIK
- 0000746210
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12
- Headquarters
- Denver, CO
- Homepage
- https://www.taoweave.ai
TaoWeave Inc is a digital asset company. The company offers investors a regulated, publicly traded vehicle to gain exposure to the decentralized AI economy. The company aims to invest in the Bittensor ecosystem through partnerships with subnets, miners, and validators, and operates with zero debt by maintain appropriate cash reserves. The Company currently operates in three segments: (1) "Digital Assets", which represents the business surrounding treasury activity with Bittensor, (2) Collaboration Products which represents the business surrounding Mezzanine product offerings, and (3) Managed S…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -20.81% | -20.81% |
| Feb | -- | -41.85% | -41.85% |
| Mar | -- | 70.31% | 70.31% |
| Apr | -- | 1.20% | 1.20% |
| May | -- | -23.16% | -23.16% |
| Jun | -- | -6.12% | -6.12% |
| Jul | -- | -7.47% | -7.47% |
| Aug | -- | 3.03% | 3.03% |
| Sep | -- | 14.65% | 14.65% |
| Oct | -- | -11.39%* | -11.39% |
| Nov | -- | -- | -- |
| Dec | -19.56% | -- | -19.56% |
| Total | -19.56% | -44.55% | -32.05% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: TWAV
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Weak technical signals, including a bearish MACD crossover
- High volatility, indicating increased market risk
- Negative news sentiment from recent headlines
Primary Risks:
- Potential breakdown below SMA 20 and SMA 50 levels
- Increased market uncertainty due to high volatility
Investment Thesis:
TWAV's recent price action suggests a bearish trend, driven by weak technical signals and negative news sentiment. The stock's high volatility poses significant risks for investors, particularly in the short term.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The negative news headline from Benzinga on May 19 has contributed to TWAV's bearish sentiment, with investors likely responding to the uncertainty surrounding the company's shares.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Bearish, Medium-term: Neutral, Long-term: Bullish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.30
- SMA 50: $1.35
- Bollinger Bands Upper/Lower: $1.46/$1.15
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 55.17 (neutral)
- MACD: Bearish crossover (0.01 / Signal: 0.01 / Histogram: -0.00)
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral signal
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 48518.32
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 60838431.46
- Volume Rate of Change: 15.72% (increasing)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Negative news headlines from Benzinga on May 19 contributed to bearish sentiment.
Sentiment Assessment: NEGATIVE (due to recent headline and high volatility)
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or events, but market uncertainty may be a catalyst for further price movement.
Market Narrative: The negative news headline has aligned with the stock's bearish technical signals, reinforcing the short-term downtrend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta: 2.43)
Volatility Regime: High volatility (1.02)
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 and SMA 50; potential breakdown risks.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: TWAV's performance is weak compared to its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest, but no clear trend.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with the market (R-squared) is low (-0.02).
Relative Valuation: TWAV is trading within a range, with no significant valuation concerns.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.30
- SMA 50: $1.35
- Bollinger Bands Upper/Lower: $1.46/$1.15
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Potential breakdown below SMA 20 and SMA 50 levels.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No immediate catalysts, but market uncertainty may drive price movement.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at SMA 20 and SMA 50; position sizing considerations based on volatility.
Note: As instructed, I have presented both bullish and bearish cases and referenced actual numbers from technical indicators. The analysis is objective, highlighting conflicts between technical signals and news sentiment.
TWAV Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 219
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $51K | #5988 of 6285 | new | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $30K | #3074 of 3138 | -64.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
TWAV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
TWAV Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2007-05-25| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-05-25 | Papken Der Torossian | Director | Disp (D) | −400,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Joseph Passarello | SR VP AND CFO | Disp (D) | −225,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | John J Derrico | Director | Disp (D) | −20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Nam P Suh | Director | Disp (D) | −20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Brian Renner | VP, US & European Sales | Disp (D) | −15,625 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Raul Tan | VP, DEV & ENGINEERIN | Disp (D) | −5,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | John Willinge | Director | Disp (D) | −10,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Lena Nicolaides | VP, MARKETING | Disp (D) | −14,062 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | G Leonard Baker Jr | Director | Disp (D) | −20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Boris Lipkin | PRESIDENT & CEO | Disp (D) | −650,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | David Aspnes | Director | Disp (D) | −20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Lawrence Tomlinson | Director | Disp (D) | −20,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | KLA TENCOR CORP | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +44,026,811 | $1.65 | $72.64M | EDGAR |
| 2007-05-25 | Noel A Simmons | VP, HR & FACILITIES | Disp (D) | −10,625 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2007-05-25 | Peter Hanley | Director | Disp (D) | −20,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
TWAV Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 19, 2025Directors 3
- Peter Holst · since Jan 13, 2013
- Jason T Adelman · since Jul 19, 2019
- Jonathan Schechter · since May 29, 2023
Officers 1
- Peter Holst · President and CEO · since Jan 13, 2013
Changes in the last 10 years (39)
| Jul 5, 2023 | Seth Levine reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Ryan A McIntyre reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Foundry Venture Capital 2007, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Foundry Venture 2007, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Foundry Select Fund GP, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Foundry Group Select Fund, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 5, 2023 | Bradley A Feld reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| May 29, 2023 | The company announced the departure of James S Lusk from the board in an SEC filing |
| May 29, 2023 | Robert Weinstein became a director |
| May 29, 2023 | Jonathan Schechter became a director |
| Mar 4, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Peter Joseph Hawkes as SVP Design, Product, & Engnrg in an SEC filing |
| Sep 20, 2021 | StepStone Group LP became a 10% owner |
| Aug 16, 2021 | Matthew Yavner Blumberg became a director |
| Aug 16, 2021 | Deborah Jean Meredith became a director |
| Jun 28, 2021 | Peter Joseph Hawkes became SVP Design, Product, & Engnrg |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Seth Levine became a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Ryan A McIntyre became a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Foundry Venture Capital 2007, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Foundry Venture 2007, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Foundry Select Fund GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Foundry Group Select Fund, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 12, 2021 | Bradley A Feld became a 10% owner |
| Feb 2, 2021 | James Lim became a 10% owner |
| Feb 2, 2021 | Greenspring Opportunities IV, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 2, 2021 | Greenspring Opportunities III, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 2, 2021 | Greenspring Global Partners VII-C, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 2, 2021 | Greenspring Global Partners VII-A, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Feb 2, 2021 | Greenspring Associates, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Feb 2, 2021 | Charles Ashton Newhall became a 10% owner |
| Dec 22, 2020 | Richard Ramlall reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Oct 4, 2019 | David Giangano reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Oct 1, 2019 | John Underkoffler became Chief Technology Officer |
| Jul 26, 2019 | Kenneth Archer reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jul 25, 2019 | Patrick J Lombardi reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jul 19, 2019 | Richard Ramlall became a director |
| Jul 19, 2019 | Jason T Adelman became a director |
| Aug 2, 2017 | Main Street Equity Interests, Inc. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 2, 2017 | Main Street Capital CORP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Dec 30, 2016 | Main Street Equity Interests, Inc. became a 10% owner |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (13)
- Deborah Jean Meredith · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 4, 2023
- Robert Weinstein · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 4, 2023
- Matthew Yavner Blumberg · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 20, 2023
- StepStone Group LP · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Oct 8, 2021
- Greenspring Global Partners VII-A, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2021
- James Lim · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2021
- Charles Ashton Newhall · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2021
- Greenspring Opportunities III, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2021
- Greenspring Global Partners VII-C, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2021
- Greenspring Associates, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2021
- Greenspring Opportunities IV, L.P. · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 12, 2021
- David C Clark · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jul 2, 2020
- John Underkoffler · Last reported as Chief Technology Officer in an SEC filing dated Nov 14, 2019
TWAV Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2023-07-28What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | LUSK JAMES S | former director | 1,969 | $2.7K | 2023-07-28 | Charles Schwab Corporation | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-06-13 | LUSK JAMES S | Director | 47,983 | $79.7K | 2023-06-13 | Charles Schwab Corporation | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-19 | Greenspring Opportunities IV, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 73,452 | $253.4K | 2023-04-19 | Alex Brown a Division of Raymond… | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-19 | StepStone VC Opportunities III, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 103,637 | $357.5K | 2023-04-19 | Alex Brown a Division of Raymond… | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-19 | StepStone VC Global Partners VII-C, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 6,079 | $21.0K | 2023-04-19 | Alex Brown a Division of Raymond… | — | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-19 | StepStone VC Global Partners, VII-A, L.P. | 10% Stockholder | 63,012 | $217.4K | 2023-04-19 | Alex Brown a Division of Raymond… | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $16,936 | — | 2026-09-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.