CLCG vs TAOZ

Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF against Thornburg American Opportunities Fund ETF Class: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
25%
9 shared positions
Fee gap
29 bp
CLCG is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
CLCG
$28M

Side by side

CLCGTAOZ
FundCrossmark Large Cap Growth ETFThornburg American Opportunities Fund ETF Class
IssuerCrossmarkThornburg
CategoryLarge Cap GrowthGlobal
Expense ratio0.50%0.79%
Assets$28M—
Average daily dollar volume$83K$237K
ListedJul 22, 2025Mar 31, 2026
FrenzyCap score2326
1-month return−12.0%−0.2%
3-month return−10.5%−3.9%
Year to date−4.1%—
1-year return−5.0%—
30-day volatility24.5%14.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−14.5%−6.0%
Trailing 12-month yield0.07%—
Holdings3444
Top 10 weight57.8%40.1%
Look-through P/E22.621.5
Holdings vs fair value+5.2%+9.5%
Holdings above 200-day average36%34%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$851K thru Jul 2026−$13M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

35% of CLCG · 31% of TAOZ
HoldingCLCGTAOZ
GOOGL9.46%5.51%
AAPL9.53%4.92%
LLY3.60%4.40%
C2.28%3.04%
SCHW2.07%3.37%
MA3.28%2.02%
BKNG1.72%2.02%
META1.52%3.32%
UBER1.25%2.31%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCLCGTAOZGap
Technology60.1%20.5%+39.6%
Industrials22.9%10.0%+12.9%
Financials6.4%14.0%−7.6%
Health Care8.3%7.1%+1.2%
Consumer Discretionary1.3%4.1%−2.7%
Real Estate0.0%3.4%−3.4%
Communication Services0.0%3.1%−3.1%
Utilities0.0%2.8%−2.8%
Energy0.0%2.3%−2.3%
Materials0.9%1.2%−0.3%

More: full overlap table · CLCG holdings · TAOZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.