NLR vs URA
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF against Global X Uranium ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
35%
11 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
NLR is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.2 pts
URA is ahead
Larger fund
URA
$5.0B
Side by side
| NLR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | Global X Uranium ETF |
| Issuer | VanEck | Global X |
| Category | Nuclear & Uranium | Nuclear & Uranium |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.69% |
| Assets | $3.2B | $5.0B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $45M | $146M |
| Listed | Aug 13, 2007 | Nov 4, 2010 |
| FrenzyCap score | 67 | 59 |
| 1-month return | −15.8% | −18.7% |
| 3-month return | −15.3% | −13.6% |
| Year to date | −24.1% | −16.8% |
| 1-year return | −37.6% | −33.5% |
| 30-day volatility | 38.0% | 37.6% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −43.3% | −43.1% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.36% | 5.86% |
| Holdings | 27 | 64 |
| Top 10 weight | 66.0% | 62.1% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | +5.8% | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 0% | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$256M thru Jun 2026 | +$206M thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 36.9% | 43.7% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
41% of NLR · 52% of URA
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | NLR | URA | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 30.1% | 7.5% | +22.7% |
| Utilities | 23.6% | 5.5% | +18.1% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 4.7% | +8.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.5% | −0.5% |
More: full overlap table · NLR holdings · URA holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.