NUKX vs URA
Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF against Global X Uranium ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
24%
9 shared positions
Fee gap
38 bp
URA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
URA
$5.0B
Side by side
| NUKX | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF | Global X Uranium ETF |
| Issuer | Nicholas | Global X |
| Category | Multisector Bond | Nuclear & Uranium |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 0.69% |
| Assets | $7.8M | $5.0B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $118K | $146M |
| Listed | Mar 2, 2026 | Nov 4, 2010 |
| FrenzyCap score | 8 | 59 |
| 1-month return | −14.5% | −18.7% |
| 3-month return | −19.8% | −13.6% |
| Year to date | — | −16.8% |
| 1-year return | — | −33.5% |
| 30-day volatility | 39.0% | 37.6% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −42.8% | −43.1% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 11.50% | 5.86% |
| Holdings | 59 | 64 |
| Top 10 weight | 61.4% | 62.1% |
| Look-through P/E | 967.3 | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | +11.3% | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 8% | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$7.4M thru Jul 2026 | +$206M thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 43.7% |
| Holdings as of | as of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing | as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
35% of NUKX · 47% of URASector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | NUKX | URA | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 36.5% | 5.5% | +31.0% |
| Materials | 24.2% | 7.5% | +16.7% |
| Industrials | 10.6% | 4.7% | +5.9% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.5% | −0.5% |
More: full overlap table · NUKX holdings · URA holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.