NUKX vs URA

Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF against Global X Uranium ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
24%
9 shared positions
Fee gap
38 bp
URA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
URA
$5.0B

Side by side

NUKXURA
FundNicholas Nuclear Income ETFGlobal X Uranium ETF
IssuerNicholasGlobal X
CategoryMultisector BondNuclear & Uranium
Expense ratio1.07%0.69%
Assets$7.8M$5.0B
Average daily dollar volume$118K$146M
ListedMar 2, 2026Nov 4, 2010
FrenzyCap score859
1-month return−14.5%−18.7%
3-month return−19.8%−13.6%
Year to date—−16.8%
1-year return—−33.5%
30-day volatility39.0%37.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−42.8%−43.1%
Trailing 12-month yield11.50%5.86%
Holdings5964
Top 10 weight61.4%62.1%
Look-through P/E967.3—
Holdings vs fair value+11.3%—
Holdings above 200-day average8%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$7.4M thru Jul 2026+$206M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—43.7%
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

35% of NUKX · 47% of URA
HoldingNUKXURA
NXE4.21%6.28%
CCJ4.19%23.39%
UEC3.73%4.39%
OKLO3.68%4.83%
UUUU2.98%2.41%
LEU5.19%2.36%
SMR3.87%2.20%
NNE3.49%0.68%
LTBR3.86%0.23%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorNUKXURAGap
Utilities36.5%5.5%+31.0%
Materials24.2%7.5%+16.7%
Industrials10.6%4.7%+5.9%
Financials0.0%0.5%−0.5%

More: full overlap table · NUKX holdings · URA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.