NUKZ vs URA

Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF against Global X Uranium ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
22%
13 shared positions
Fee gap
16 bp
URA is cheaper
1-year return gap
15.9 pts
NUKZ is ahead
Larger fund
URA
$5.0B

Side by side

NUKZURA
FundRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETFGlobal X Uranium ETF
IssuerRangeGlobal X
CategoryNuclear & UraniumNuclear & Uranium
Expense ratio0.85%0.69%
Assets$890M$5.0B
Average daily dollar volume$6.2M$146M
ListedJan 10, 2024Nov 4, 2010
FrenzyCap score4459
1-month return−8.2%−18.7%
3-month return−10.5%−13.6%
Year to date−8.3%−16.8%
1-year return−17.5%−33.5%
30-day volatility24.6%37.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−24.4%−43.1%
Trailing 12-month yield0.99%5.86%
Holdings4664
Top 10 weight36.2%62.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+13.1%—
Holdings above 200-day average17%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$27M thru May 2026+$206M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility29.9%43.7%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

31% of NUKZ · 45% of URA
HoldingNUKZURA
CCJ9.06%23.39%
OKLO2.31%4.83%
SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION3.43%2.03%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.1.81%2.25%
SMR1.75%2.20%
UEC1.46%4.39%
LEU1.26%2.36%
KEPCO Engineering & Construction Company, Inc0.75%1.66%
NNE1.98%0.68%
Silex Systems Ltd1.61%0.66%
IMSR2.23%0.23%
LTBR1.45%0.23%
NKLR2.33%0.06%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorNUKZURAGap
Industrials23.5%4.7%+18.8%
Utilities20.8%5.5%+15.3%
Materials17.9%7.5%+10.5%
Technology0.9%0.0%+0.9%
Financials0.0%0.5%−0.5%

More: full overlap table · NUKZ holdings · URA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.