ALUB Alussa Energy Acquisition Corp. II
XNYS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
What changed
Recent filings, trades and moves- Nov 12 Reported earnings: EPS $0.07
- Nov 13 Quarterly report (10-Q) filed
- Industry (SIC)
- BLANK CHECKS (6770)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.4B
- List Date
- 2026-01-06
- CIK
- 0002041493
- Headquarters
- Grand Cayman, E9
- Homepage
- https://www.alussaenergy.com
Alussa Energy Acquisition Corp II is a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Feb | -0.30% | -0.30% |
| Mar | -0.31% | -0.31% |
| Apr | -0.30% | -0.30% |
| May | 0.20% | 0.20% |
| Jun | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| Jul | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Aug | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sep | 0.20% | 0.20% |
| Oct | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| Nov | 0.20%* | 0.20% |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | 0.89% | 0.89% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: ALUB
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Trend indicators suggest a range-bound market, with no clear uptrend or downtrend
- Momentum oscillators are neutral, indicating no strong buying or selling pressure
- Bollinger Bands indicate a neutral signal, with price bouncing off the middle band
Primary Risks:
- Low volatility may lead to limited price movement and low trading activity
- Lack of recent news and earnings data hinders confidence in the stock's short-term direction
Investment Thesis: ALUB appears to be stuck in a trading range, with no clear catalyst driving significant price movements. The low volatility and neutral technical indicators suggest a patient approach, potentially waiting for a breakout or breakdown from the current range.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: N/A (no recent news available)
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Range-bound
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Range-bound
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $10.03
- Middle Bollinger Band: $10.01
- Lower Bollinger Band: $9.98
- SMA 20: $10.02
- EMA 12: $10.01
- EMA 26: $10.01
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 50.05 (neutral)
- MACD: Bearish signal, with the histogram below zero
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral signal, with price bouncing off the middle band
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 49794.80
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 1903959.00
- Volume Rate of Change: -92.51%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: N/A (no recent news available)
Sentiment Assessment: N/A (no recent news available)
Catalyst Identification: N/A (no earnings data available)
Market Narrative: The lack of recent news and earnings data makes it challenging to assess the market narrative.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation:
- Beta: 0.03 (vs SPY)
- Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Volatility Regime:
- Current volatility: Low
- Historical volatility: HV20 2.5%, HV30 2.2%, HV60 3.6%
Options Market Signals:
- IV Premium vs HV30: N/A (positive = implied richer than realized)
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: SMA 20, EMA 12, Lower Bollinger Band
- Risk management considerations: Stop-loss levels at key support/resistance levels
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: N/A (no sector performance data available)
Institutional Activity: N/A (no institutional activity data available)
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation with SPY: 0.10 (low)
- Relative strength vs market: Neutral
Relative Valuation: N/A (no relative valuation data available)
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $10.03
- Middle Bollinger Band: $10.01
- Lower Bollinger Band: $9.98
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- SMA 20: $10.02
- EMA 12: $10.01
- EMA 26: $10.01
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: N/A (no earnings data available)
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at key support/resistance levels, considering the low volatility and neutral technical indicators.
Overall Analysis: ALUB appears to be in a range-bound market with no clear catalyst driving significant price movements. The low volatility and neutral technical indicators suggest a patient approach, potentially waiting for a breakout or breakdown from the current range.
ALUB Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Calendars: the long leg is valued at the short leg’s expiration (Black-Scholes at its current IV) across the range of prices the short leg’s IV implies, giving the best-case profit (R/R = that over the debit) and P(profit).
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Scanning bull put, bear call, iron condor and calendar spreads…
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
IV(call wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsThe same measure on the upside: how the OTM call is priced against the at-the-money strike.
- Negative (typical) — calls trade below ATM for most stocks and indices, so the sign alone says little.
- Percentile vs own history: high = upside calls unusually rich for this name (squeezes, takeover talk, commodity supply scares); low = calls cheaper than usual.
Put or call vs ATM tells you how expensive that tail is. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Loading the implied volatility surface…
Loading the implied volatility smile…
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 148
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $7.5M | #1790 of 3716 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ALUB Institutional Ownership (13F)
Filings for 2026-06-30 · 7 already for 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
ALUB Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Nov 12, 2025Directors 9
- Balazs Peter Matrai · since Nov 12, 2025
- Chi Tu Chow · since Nov 12, 2025
- Daniel Barcelo · since Nov 12, 2025
- Jesse A Peltan · since Nov 12, 2025
- John Wu · since Nov 12, 2025
- Maurice Dijols · since Nov 12, 2025
- Ole Slorer · since Nov 12, 2025
- Philippe Miguel Lanier · since Nov 12, 2025
- W Richard Anderson · since Nov 12, 2025
Officers 2
- Ole Slorer · Chief Executive Officer · since Nov 12, 2025
- Benjamin W Atkins · Chief Financial Officer · since Nov 12, 2025
10% owners 1
- Alussa Energy Sponsor II LLC (entity) · since Nov 12, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (12)
| Nov 12, 2025 | W Richard Anderson became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Philippe Miguel Lanier became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Ole Slorer became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Ole Slorer became Chief Executive Officer |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Maurice Dijols became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | John Wu became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Jesse A Peltan became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Daniel Barcelo became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Chi Tu Chow became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Benjamin W Atkins became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Balazs Peter Matrai became a director |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Alussa Energy Sponsor II LLC became a 10% owner |
| Filing Date | Event | Link |
|---|
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
ALUB vs Peers
Related companies, largest first| Company | Market cap | P/E | Revenue growth | YTD | IV rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZKP Lafayette Digital Acquisition Corp. I Cl | $394M | — | — | +1.4% | — |
| ALUB Alussa Energy Acquisition Corp. II | $365M | — | — | +1.9% | — |
| AEAQ Activate Energy Acquisition Corp. Class | $317M | — | — | +2.1% | — |
| LEGO Legato Merger Corp. IV | $313M | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| BIXI Bitcoin Infrastructure Acquisition Corp | $306M | — | — | +3.4% | — |
| SCII SC II Acquisition Corp. Class A ordinary | $255M | — | — | +3.2% | — |
| SOCA Solarius Capital Acquisition Corp. Class | $245M | — | — | +3.9% | — |
| TONT Graf Global Corp. | $155M | — | — | +1.4% | — |
| UAC United Acquisition Corp. I | — | — | — | +0.7% | — |
| Peer median | $306M | — | — | +1.8% | — |
P/E uses the latest reported trailing-12-month diluted EPS; "—" means no positive earnings or no data.