Eagle Point Credit Company(ECC)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
ECC iron condor setups
ECC expected move
ECC IV rank history
ECC Fibonacci levels
ECC insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
ECC
—
—
Snapshot
Info
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
Eagle Point Credit Co is an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Company's primary investment objective is to generate high current income, with a secondary objective to generate capital appreciation. The Company seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing in equity and junior debt tranches of CLOs.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.24% | 6 |
| Feb | -3.69% | 6 |
| Mar | -3.77% | 6 |
| Apr | +0.22% | 6 |
| May | -1.96% | 6 |
| Jun | -3.40% | 6 |
| Jul | -2.01% | 6 |
| Aug | +1.76% | 6 |
| Sep | -4.70% | 6 |
| Oct | -4.96% | 5 |
| Nov | +0.65% | 5 |
| Dec | -6.26% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $3.85
SMA 50: $3.80
SMA 200: $4.43
Current: $3.92
EMA 12: $3.87
EMA 26: $3.85
MACD: 0.0253 | Signal: 0.0051
BULLISH
ADX (14): 18.30
RANGE
+DI: 26.22
−DI: 15.61
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 57.53
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 64.10
Stoch %D: 65.38
Williams %R: -23.08
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $3.95
BB Lower: $3.75
NEUTRAL
OBV: -125,131,013
Vol SMA 20: 779,271
Vol ROC: 71.81%
ATR: $0.08
True Range: $0.06
HV 20: 19.5%
HV 30: 20.2%
HV 60: 21.7%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-09-09T00:00:00 – 2026-09-04T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for ECC:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)
Key drivers and primary risks: ECC's recent price action has been range-bound, with a neutral sentiment prevailing across news headlines. Technical indicators suggest a potential uptrend, but volatility remains low.
2-3 sentence investment thesis: ECC appears to be consolidating its gains after a recent increase in yield. The stock's low volatility and moderate beta make it an attractive option for income-focused investors. However, the lack of earnings data and limited options activity may hinder further price appreciation.
Recent news sentiment impact: The neutral sentiment prevailing across recent news headlines suggests that ECC's price movement is driven more by technical factors than news-driven catalysts.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL; Medium-term (1-3 months): BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages and technical patterns: * SMA 20: $3.85 * SMA 50: $3.80 * Upper Bollinger Band: $3.95
Momentum Signals:
* RSI interpretation: Neutral (57.53) - not overbought or oversold
* MACD signal: Bullish momentum - crossover above signal line
* Bollinger Bands position: Neutral - price within the bands
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals: * Volume SMA 20: Increasing volume suggests growing institutional interest * On-Balance Volume (OBV): Decreasing OBV indicates a lack of momentum
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Key themes from last 10 news articles: The majority of recent headlines focus on ECC's high yield and income-generating potential, with no significant catalysts or events driving price movements.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment: NEUTRAL The neutral sentiment prevailing across recent news headlines suggests that ECC's price movement is driven more by technical factors than news-driven catalysts.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming events, earnings, product launches, regulatory changes: No significant upcoming events or earnings releases announced.
Market Narrative: How news aligns with or contradicts technical signals: The neutral sentiment and lack of significant news headlines suggest that ECC's price movement is driven more by technical factors than news-driven catalysts. This narrative aligns with the stock's recent range-bound behavior.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Risk relative to market (beta 0.72 - low risk) ECC's beta indicates a relatively stable stock with low volatility.
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: Low volatility regime compared to historical averages, suggesting a lack of momentum.
Options Market Signals: IV rank, put/call ratios, unusual activity: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations: Key support level: $3.75 (lower Bollinger Band)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: ECC's performance is in line with its sector peers, suggesting a lack of significant outperformance or underperformance.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest signals: Increasing volume suggests growing institutional interest.
Correlation Analysis: How stock moves relative to market (R-squared interpretation): Low correlation coefficient (0.28) indicates that ECC's price movement is not strongly correlated with the broader market.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: ECC appears to be consolidating its gains, suggesting a potential mean reversion or breakout from its current trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance to monitor: * SMA 20: $3.85 * Upper Bollinger Band: $3.95
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: * SMA 50: $3.80 (support) * Lower Bollinger Band: $3.75 (resistance)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates, FDA approvals, product launches: No earnings data available.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations: Consider setting a stop-loss at the lower Bollinger Band ($3.75) to limit potential losses.
This comprehensive analysis provides an in-depth look at ECC's technical and fundamental characteristics, as well as its market context and positioning. The report highlights key levels and action items for investors considering ECC as a potential investment opportunity.
Generated
News
Options Activity
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.72
- Correlation (SPY)
- 27.6%
- R²
- 0.08
- Ann. Volatility
- 33.4%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.8%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-03-18
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-18 | Daniel W. Ko | Buy (P) | +57,165 | $3.50 | $200.1K | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-13 | Kenneth P. Onorio | CFO / COO | Buy (P) | +110,000 | $3.74 | $411.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-21 | Thomas P. Majewski | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +1,086 | $23.00 | $25.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-03-18 | Kenneth P. Onorio | CFO/COO | Buy (P) | +6,250 | $8.00 | $50.0K | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-18 | Kenneth P. Onorio | CFO/COO | Buy (P) | +10,000 | $8.99 | $89.9K | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-15 | Kenneth P. Onorio | CFO/COO | Buy (P) | +300 | $9.73 | $2.9K | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-31 | Thomas P. Majewski | CEO | Buy (P) | +3,000 | $20.80 | $62.4K | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-04 | Trident Capital V-PF, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −4,679,802 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-04-04 | Trident Capital V, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | Other (J) | −6,732,876 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-16 | Kenneth P. Onorio | CFO/COO | Buy (P) | +124 | $11.33 | $1.4K | EDGAR |
| 2022-08-17 | Kenneth P. Onorio | CFO/COO | Buy (P) | +75 | $11.88 | $891 | EDGAR |
| 2022-06-15 | Thomas P. Majewski | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +2,500 | $2416.00 | $6.04M | EDGAR |
| 2022-03-09 | Ottawa Avenue Private Capital, LLC | Sell (S) | −1,086 | $14.02 | -$15.2K | EDGAR | |
| 2022-02-28 | Thomas P. Majewski | Chief Executive Officer | Other (J) | −995 | $25.00 | -$24.9K | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-28 | Daniel M. Spinner | Other (J) | −192 | $25.00 | -$4.8K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
14 insiders · @ $3.92
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trident V Parallel Fund, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 5,033,184 | $19.73M | $10.00M | 1 | 2015-03-03 |
| 2 | Enstar Group LTD | 10%+ Owner | 1,275,278 | $5.00M | -$33.00M | 1 | 2015-01-08 |
| 3 | OA Eagle Group Investors, LLC | 1,084,549 | $4.25M | -$14.72M | 2 | 2022-01-18 | |
| 4 | OA Eagle Group Investors II, LLC | 827,377 | $3.24M | -$4.43M | 1 | 2022-02-11 | |
| 5 | Ottawa Avenue Private Capital, LLC | 470,386 | $1.84M | -$22.08M | 4 | 2022-03-09 | |
| 6 | Kenneth P. Onorio | CFO / COO | 207,058 | $811.7K | $558.3K | 7 | 2026-03-13 |
| 7 | Eagle Point Credit Management LLC | 100,000 | $392.0K | $2.00M | 1 | 2014-10-09 | |
| 8 | Daniel W. Ko | 82,665 | $324.0K | $576.4K | 2 | 2026-03-18 | |
| 9 | Thomas P. Majewski | Chief Executive Officer | 33,000 | $129.4K | $6.48M | 7 | 2025-03-21 |
| 10 | Daniel M. Spinner | 27,447 | $107.6K | $377.9K | 4 | 2022-02-28 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.